Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK; Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK.
Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, UK; Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Grimso Wildlife Research Station, 730 91 Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Jul;32(7):518-530. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 May 18.
As a result of ecological and social drivers, the management of problems caused by wildlife is becoming more selective, often targeting specific animals. Narrowing the sights of management relies upon the ecology of certain 'problem individuals' and their disproportionate contribution to impacts upon human interests. We assess the ecological evidence for problem individuals and confirm that some individuals or classes can be both disproportionately responsible and more likely to reoffend. The benefits of management can sometimes be short-lived, and selective management can affect tolerance of wildlife for better or worse, but, when effectively targeted, selective management can bring benefits by mitigating impact and conflict, often in a more socially acceptable way.
由于生态和社会驱动因素的影响,野生动物问题的管理变得更加有选择性,通常针对特定的动物。缩小管理范围依赖于某些“问题个体”的生态学及其对人类利益的不成比例的影响。我们评估了问题个体的生态学证据,并确认某些个体或群体可能既承担不成比例的责任,又更有可能再次犯罪。管理的好处有时是短暂的,选择性管理可以对野生动物的容忍度产生好坏两方面的影响,但如果目标明确,选择性管理可以通过减轻影响和冲突带来好处,通常以更被社会接受的方式。