Patel Rena C, Morroni Chelsea, Scarsi Kimberly K, Sripipatana Tabitha, Kiarie James, Cohen Craig R
Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 May 11;20(1):21396. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21396.
Preventing unintended pregnancies is important among all women, including those living with HIV. Increasing numbers of women, including HIV-positive women, choose progestin-containing subdermal implants, which are one of the most effective forms of contraception. However, drug-drug interactions between contraceptive hormones and efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) may reduce implant effectiveness. We present four inter-related perspectives on this issue.
First, as a case study, we discuss how limited data prompted country-level guidance against the use of implants among women concomitantly using efavirenz in South Africa and its subsequent negative effects on the use of implants in general. Second, we discuss the existing clinical data on this topic, including the observational study from Kenya showing women using implants plus efavirenz-based ART had three-fold higher rates of pregnancy than women using implants plus nevirapine-based ART. However, the higher rates of pregnancy in the implant plus efavirenz group were still lower than the pregnancy rates among women using common alternative contraceptive methods, such as injectables. Third, we discuss the four pharmacokinetic studies that show 50-70% reductions in plasma progestin concentrations in women concurrently using efavirenz-based ART as compared to women not on any ART. These pharmacokinetic studies provide the biologic basis for the clinical findings. Fourth, we discuss how data on this topic have marked implications for both family planning and HIV programmes and policies globally.
This controversy underlines the importance of integrating family planning services into routine HIV care, counselling women appropriately on increased risk of pregnancy with concomitant implant and efavirenz use, and expanding contraceptive method mix for all women. As global access to ART expands, greater research is needed to explore implant effectiveness when used concomitantly with newer ART regimens. Data on how HIV-positive women and their partners choose contraceptives, as well as information from providers on how they present and counsel patients on contraceptive options are needed to help guide policy and service delivery. Lastly, greater collaboration between HIV and reproductive health experts at all levels are needed to develop successful strategies to ensure the best HIV and reproductive health outcomes for women living with HIV.
预防意外怀孕对所有女性都很重要,包括感染艾滋病毒的女性。越来越多的女性,包括艾滋病毒呈阳性的女性,选择含孕激素的皮下植入物,这是最有效的避孕方式之一。然而,避孕激素与基于依非韦伦的抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)之间的药物相互作用可能会降低植入物的有效性。我们就此问题提出四个相互关联的观点。
首先,作为一个案例研究,我们讨论有限的数据如何促使南非出台国家层面的指导意见,反对在同时使用依非韦伦的女性中使用植入物,以及这一指导意见随后对植入物总体使用产生的负面影响。其次,我们讨论关于这一主题的现有临床数据,包括来自肯尼亚的观察性研究,该研究表明,使用植入物加基于依非韦伦的ART的女性的怀孕率是使用植入物加基于奈韦拉平的ART的女性的三倍。然而,植入物加依非韦伦组较高的怀孕率仍低于使用常见替代避孕方法(如注射剂)的女性的怀孕率。第三,我们讨论四项药代动力学研究,这些研究表明,与未接受任何ART的女性相比,同时使用基于依非韦伦的ART的女性血浆孕激素浓度降低了50 - 70%。这些药代动力学研究为临床发现提供了生物学基础。第四,我们讨论关于这一主题的数据如何对全球的计划生育和艾滋病毒项目及政策产生重大影响。
这一争议凸显了将计划生育服务纳入常规艾滋病毒护理的重要性,适当地向女性咨询同时使用植入物和依非韦伦时怀孕风险增加的问题,并为所有女性扩大避孕方法的选择范围。随着全球获得ART的机会增加,需要进行更多研究以探索与更新的ART方案同时使用时植入物的有效性。需要关于艾滋病毒呈阳性的女性及其伴侣如何选择避孕方法的数据,以及来自提供者的关于他们如何向患者介绍和咨询避孕选择的信息,以帮助指导政策和服务提供。最后,各级艾滋病毒和生殖健康专家需要加强合作,制定成功的策略,以确保感染艾滋病毒的女性获得最佳的艾滋病毒和生殖健康结果。