1 The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Finland.
2 Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH), Finland.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Aug;24(12):1311-1318. doi: 10.1177/2047487317711048. Epub 2017 May 22.
Background We evaluated the association of accelerometer-based sedentary behaviour and physical activity with the risk of cardiovascular disease. Design The design of this study used a population-based, cross-sectional sample. Methods A subsample of participants in the Health 2011 Study in Finland used the tri-axial accelerometer (≥4 days, >10 h/day, n = 1398). Sedentary behaviour (sitting, lying) and standing still in six-second epochs were recognised from raw acceleration data based on intensity and device orientation. The intensity of physical activity was calculated as one-minute moving averages of mean amplitude deviation of resultant acceleration and converted to metabolic equivalents. Metabolic equivalents were categorised to light physical activity (1.5-2.9 metabolic equivalents) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity≥3.0 metabolic equivalents). Daily sedentary behaviour, standing still, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were expressed as mean daily total time, accumulated time and number of different bouts (from 30 s to >30 min), mean daily metabolic equivalent and weekly peak metabolic equivalent levels of different bout lengths and number of breaks in sedentary behaviour. The ten-year cardiovascular disease risk was based on the Framingham risk model. Results The mean number of daily sedentary behaviour bouts was more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease risk than mean daily total time. In the best model, smaller waist circumference, greater value of mean daily metabolic equivalent levels of one-minute bouts, higher accumulated time of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity lasting ≤30 min, higher number of >5 min standing bouts and a higher number of long (>30 min) bouts of light physical activity were significantly associated with lower cardiovascular disease risk (R= 0.836). Conclusions The objectively measured number and accumulated time from different bout lengths of physical activity and sedentary behaviour were associated with cardiovascular disease risk, which is considered relevant for estimating cardiovascular diseases and for devising preventive actions.
我们评估了基于加速度计的久坐行为和身体活动与心血管疾病风险的关联。
本研究采用基于人群的横断面样本。
芬兰健康 2011 研究的参与者亚组使用三轴加速度计(≥4 天,>10 小时/天,n=1398)。根据强度和设备方向,从原始加速度数据中识别出久坐行为(坐着、躺着)和静止站立。通过将一分钟的移动平均值转换为代谢当量,计算出身体活动的强度。将代谢当量分为轻度身体活动(1.5-2.9 代谢当量)和中度至剧烈身体活动(中等至剧烈身体活动≥3.0 代谢当量)。每天的久坐行为、静止站立、轻度身体活动和中度至剧烈身体活动分别表示为平均每日总时间、累计时间和不同时间的次数(从 30 秒到>30 分钟)、平均每日代谢当量和每周高峰代谢当量水平的不同时间长度和不同的久坐行为休息次数。十年心血管疾病风险基于弗雷明汉风险模型。
平均每日久坐行为的次数与心血管疾病风险的相关性强于平均每日总时间。在最佳模型中,腰围较小、平均每日代谢当量水平较高、持续≤30 分钟的中度至剧烈身体活动的累计时间较高、>5 分钟的站立时间较多和较长时间(>30 分钟)的轻体力活动次数较多,与心血管疾病风险降低显著相关(R=0.836)。
不同时间长度的身体活动和久坐行为的客观测量次数和累计时间与心血管疾病风险相关,这对于估计心血管疾病和制定预防措施是有意义的。