Suppr超能文献

联合国维和人员霍乱预防措施的抗菌药物耐药性风险

Antimicrobial Resistance Risks of Cholera Prophylaxis for United Nations Peacekeepers.

作者信息

Kunkel Amber, Lewnard Joseph A, Pitzer Virginia E, Cohen Ted

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jul 25;61(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00026-17. Print 2017 Aug.

Abstract

More than 5 years after a United Nations peacekeeping battalion introduced cholera to Haiti, over 150,000 peacekeepers continue to be deployed annually from countries where cholera is endemic. The United Nations has thus far declined to provide antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis to peacekeepers, a policy based largely on concerns that the risks of drug resistance generation and spread would outweigh the potential benefits of preventing future cholera importations. In this study, we sought to better understand the relative benefits and risks of cholera chemoprophylaxis for peacekeepers in terms of antibiotic resistance. Using a stochastic model to quantify the potential impact of chemoprophylaxis on importation and transmission of drug-resistant and drug-sensitive , we found that chemoprophylaxis would decrease the probability of cholera importation but would increase the expected number of drug-resistant infections if an importation event were to occur. Despite this potential increase, we found that at least 10 drug-sensitive infections would likely be averted per excess drug-resistant infection under a wide range of assumptions about the underlying prevalence of drug resistance and risk of acquired resistance. Given these findings, policymakers should reconsider whether the potential resistance risks of providing antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis to peacekeepers are sufficient to outweigh the anticipated benefits.

摘要

在一个联合国维和营将霍乱引入海地五年多后,每年仍有超过15万名维和人员从霍乱流行国家被部署到海地。联合国迄今拒绝为维和人员提供抗菌化学预防,这一政策主要基于对产生和传播耐药性的风险将超过预防未来霍乱输入的潜在益处的担忧。在本研究中,我们试图从抗生素耐药性方面更好地理解霍乱化学预防对维和人员的相对益处和风险。使用一个随机模型来量化化学预防对耐药和敏感霍乱输入及传播的潜在影响,我们发现化学预防会降低霍乱输入的概率,但如果发生输入事件,会增加耐药感染的预期数量。尽管有这种潜在增加,但我们发现,在关于耐药性的潜在流行率和获得性耐药风险的广泛假设下,每多一例耐药感染,至少可能避免10例敏感感染。鉴于这些发现,政策制定者应重新考虑为维和人员提供抗菌化学预防的潜在耐药风险是否足以超过预期益处。

相似文献

3
Cholera vaccine will reduce antibiotic use.霍乱疫苗将减少抗生素的使用。
Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):674. doi: 10.1126/science.325_674b.
6
Lessons from cholera in Haiti.海地霍乱的教训。
J Public Health Policy. 2014 May;35(2):135-6. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2014.5. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
9
Haitian cholera outbreak-United Nations admits involvement.海地霍乱疫情——联合国承认介入。
J Infect Public Health. 2017 Jul-Aug;10(4):483-484. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Informing policy via dynamic models: Cholera in Haiti.通过动态模型为政策提供信息:海地的霍乱疫情。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Apr 29;20(4):e1012032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012032. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Implementation of targeted cholera response activities, Cameroon.喀麦隆实施针对性霍乱应对活动。
Bull World Health Organ. 2023 Mar 1;101(3):170-178. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.288885. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

5
Cholera and blame in Haiti.海地的霍乱与指责
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Dec;15(12):1380-1. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00411-9. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
6
Updated global burden of cholera in endemic countries.流行国家霍乱的全球负担最新情况。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jun 4;9(6):e0003832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003832. eCollection 2015.
8
Assessing the international spreading risk associated with the 2014 west african ebola outbreak.评估与2014年西非埃博拉疫情相关的国际传播风险。
PLoS Curr. 2014 Sep 2;6:ecurrents.outbreaks.cd818f63d40e24aef769dda7df9e0da5. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.cd818f63d40e24aef769dda7df9e0da5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验