• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair.复杂腹壁大手术患者的闭合切口预防性负压伤口治疗
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):583-589. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1620-0. Epub 2017 May 23.
2
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Closed Abdominal Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.预防性负压伤口治疗在减少闭合性腹部切口手术部位感染中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2024 Mar;13(3):123-130. doi: 10.1089/wound.2023.0052. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for closed laparotomy incisions after ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性负压伤口疗法在腹外疝修补术后闭合式剖腹切口的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Jan;97:106216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106216. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
4
Prophylactic Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Prevents Surgical Site Infection in Abdominal Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.预防性负压伤口疗法可预防腹部手术部位感染:随机对照试验和观察性研究的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e3804-e3813. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1203.
5
Negative pressure therapy for high-risk abdominal wall reconstruction incisions.负压治疗高危腹壁重建切口。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Jun;14(3):270-4. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.059. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
6
Use of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure therapy is associated with reduced surgical site infections in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy.预防性闭合切口负压治疗与接受剖腹手术的妇科肿瘤患者的手术部位感染减少有关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):731.e1-731.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
Risk Assessment of Abdominal Wall Thickness Measured on Pre-Operative Computerized Tomography for Incisional Surgical Site Infection after Abdominal Surgery.术前计算机断层扫描测量的腹壁厚度对腹部手术后切口手术部位感染的风险评估
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jul;98(7):677-83.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis including GRADE qualification of the risk of surgical site infections after prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional dressings in clean and contaminated surgery.一项系统评价和荟萃分析,包括对清洁-污染手术中预防性负压伤口治疗与传统敷料相比手术部位感染风险的GRADE分级。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(36):e4673. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004673.
9
Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy for prevention of surgical site infection in abdominal surgery: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.预防性负压伤口治疗预防腹部手术部位感染的效果:一项全国性的横断面调查。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1983-1988. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01017-3. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
10
Does Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Laparotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled trials.预防性负压伤口治疗是否能预防剖腹术后手术部位感染?随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2023 Jun;47(6):1464-1474. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-06908-7. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
PROphylactic closed incision Negative-PRESSure treatment in open incisional hernia repair: Protocol for a multicenter randomized trial (PROPRESS study).开放性切口疝修补术中预防性闭合切口负压治疗:一项多中心随机试验的方案(PROPRESS研究)
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jan 10;38:101256. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101256. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review meta-analysis.预防性负压伤口治疗在开放型腹疝修补术后的疗效:系统评价荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02280-4.
3
Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.预防急性护理医院手术部位感染的策略:2022 更新版。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 May;44(5):695-720. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.67. Epub 2023 May 4.
4
Successful outcome of combined surgical and negative pressure therapy in complex enterocutaneous fistulas: a case report.联合手术及负压治疗复杂肠造口瘘的成功案例:病例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Mar 31;2023(3):rjad161. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjad161. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
State-of-the-art abdominal wall reconstruction and closure.腹壁重建与关闭的最新技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 24;408(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02811-w.
6
Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction.生物补片与合成补片用于美国疾病控制与预防中心3级和4级开放性腹壁重建的效果比较
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3073-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09486-2. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
7
The European Hernia Society Prehabilitation Project: A Systematic Review of Intra-Operative Prevention Strategies for Surgical Site Occurrences in Ventral Hernia Surgery.欧洲疝学会术前康复项目:腹疝手术中手术部位事件的术中预防策略的系统评价
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 13;9:847279. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.847279. eCollection 2022.
8
Comment on: "Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis".对《开放性腹疝修补术后预防性负压伤口治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析》的评论
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1219-1220. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02610-0. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Prevents Hernia Recurrence in Simultaneous Ventral Hernia Repair and Panniculectomy.负压伤口治疗可预防同时进行的腹直肌旁疝修补术和腹壁成形术中的疝复发。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 7;10(3):e4171. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004171. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Building a Center for Abdominal Core Health: The Importance of a Holistic Multidisciplinary Approach.建立腹部核心健康中心:整体多学科方法的重要性。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Mar;26(3):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05241-5. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective.世界卫生组织关于手术部位感染预防的术中及术后措施新建议:基于证据的全球视角。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;16(12):e288-e303. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
2
New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective.世界卫生组织关于手术部位感染预防的术前措施新建议:基于证据的全球视角。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;16(12):e276-e287. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-X. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
3
Closed Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy Is Associated with Decreased Surgical-Site Infections: A Meta-Analysis.闭合切口负压治疗与手术部位感染减少相关:一项荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Sep;136(3):592-602. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001519.
4
Cost-utility analysis of negative pressure wound therapy in high-risk cesarean section wounds.负压伤口治疗在高危剖宫产伤口中的成本效用分析。
J Surg Res. 2015 May 15;195(2):612-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
5
Prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy after cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后负压伤口治疗的预防性应用。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;125(2):299-307. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000634.
6
Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination.使用脱细胞真皮基质进行腹壁重建的结果不受伤口污染的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov;219(5):853-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
7
Positive outcomes with negative pressure therapy over primarily closed large abdominal wall reconstruction reduces surgical site infection rates.在主要为闭合性的大腹壁重建中,负压治疗的积极效果可降低手术部位感染率。
Hernia. 2015 Apr;19(2):273-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1312-y. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
8
Assessing complications and cost-utilization in ventral hernia repair utilizing biologic mesh in a bridged underlay technique.评估在桥接衬垫技术中使用生物补片进行腹疝修补术的并发症及成本效益。
Am J Surg. 2015 Apr;209(4):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.04.017. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
9
Novel wound management system reduction of surgical site morbidity after ventral hernia repairs: a critical analysis.新型伤口管理系统降低腹疝修补术后手术部位发病率的批判性分析
Am J Surg. 2015 Feb;209(2):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.022. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
10
Safety and durability of one-stage repair of abdominal wall defects with enteric fistulas.一期修复伴肠瘘腹壁缺损的安全性和耐久性。
Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):553-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000733.

复杂腹壁大手术患者的闭合切口预防性负压伤口治疗

Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair.

作者信息

de Vries F E E, Atema J J, Lapid O, Obdeijn M C, Boermeester M A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):583-589. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1620-0. Epub 2017 May 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-017-1620-0
PMID:28534258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5517612/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate if incisional prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) reduces wound infections and other wound complications in high-risk patients undergoing major complex ventral abdominal wall repair.

METHODS

Retrospective before-after comparison nested in a consecutive series of patients undergoing elective major complex abdominal wall repair. Starting January 2014, pNPWT was applied on the closed incisional wound for a minimum of 5 days. To minimize selection bias, we compared two periods of 14 months before and after January 2014. Wound infections according to the Centre for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection classification as well as other wound complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included in the pNPWT group and 34 in the control group. The study group involved clean-contaminated and contaminated operations due to enterocutaneous fistula, enterostomies or infected mesh. Median duration of pNPWT was 5 days (IQR 5-7). Overall wound infection rate was 35%. pNPWT was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative wound infection rate (24 versus 51%; p = 0.029, OR 0.30 (95% CI 0.10-0.90)). Incisional wound infection rates dropped from 48 to 7% (p < 0.01, OR 0.08 (95% CI 0.16-0.39), whereas the number of subcutaneous abscesses was comparable in both groups. Moreover, less interventions were needed in the pNPWT group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Closed incision pNPWT seems a promising solution to reduce the incidence of wound infections in complex abdominal wall surgery. Randomized controlled trials are needed to estimate more precisely the value and cost-effectiveness of pNPWT in this high-risk setting.

摘要

目的

评估切开预防性负压伤口治疗(pNPWT)是否能降低接受复杂大型腹前壁修复术的高危患者的伤口感染及其他伤口并发症的发生率。

方法

在一系列连续接受择期复杂大型腹壁修复术的患者中进行回顾性前后对照研究。从2014年1月开始,对闭合的手术切口应用pNPWT至少5天。为尽量减少选择偏倚,我们比较了2014年1月前后各14个月的两个时间段。记录根据疾病控制中心手术部位感染分类的伤口感染以及其他伤口并发症情况。

结果

pNPWT组纳入32例患者,对照组纳入34例患者。研究组包括因肠皮肤瘘、肠造口术或感染补片导致的清洁-污染手术和污染手术。pNPWT的中位持续时间为5天(四分位间距5 - 7天)。总体伤口感染率为35%。pNPWT与术后伤口感染率显著降低相关(24%对51%;p = 0.029,比值比0.30(95%可信区间0.10 - 0.90))。手术切口感染率从48%降至7%(p < 0.01,比值比0.08(95%可信区间0.16 - 0.39)),而两组皮下脓肿的数量相当。此外,pNPWT组所需的干预措施更少(p < 0.001)。

结论

闭合切口pNPWT似乎是降低复杂腹壁手术伤口感染发生率的一种有前景的方法。需要进行随机对照试验以更精确地评估pNPWT在这种高危情况下的价值和成本效益。