Suppr超能文献

场边脑震荡评估能否预测运动相关脑震荡后的后续神经认知障碍?

Do Sideline Concussion Assessments Predict Subsequent Neurocognitive Impairment After Sport-Related Concussion?

作者信息

Sufrinko Alicia, McAllister-Deitrick Jamie, Womble Melissa, Kontos Anthony

机构信息

UPMC Center for Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2017 Jul;52(7):676-681. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.4.01. Epub 2017 May 23.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Comprehensive, multidomain assessment is the standard of care after sport-related concussion. However, the relationship between performance on sideline concussion-assessment tools and in-office computerized neurocognitive testing has received little attention, and the prognostic utility of sideline measures is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate concurrent impairment on commonly used concussion measures 24 to 48 hours postinjury while also determining the predictive utility of sideline measures on computerized neurocognitive testing in the acute to subacute recovery periods postinjury.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

High school and collegiate athletics.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 125 high school and college-aged athletes (85 males, 40 females) 14 to 23 (16.8 ± 2.21) years old.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants were administered sideline concussion-assessment measures (ie, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing [ImPACT], Standardized Assessment of Concussion [SAC], and Balance Error Scoring System [BESS]) 24 to 48 hours postinjury and completed ImPACT and the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale 5 to 7 and 10 to 14 days postinjury. Outcome measures were the ImPACT composite (verbal memory, visual memory, reaction time, visual-motor speed), SAC, and BESS scores and total symptom score on the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale.

RESULTS

Participants demonstrated heterogeneous patterns of impairment on measures 24 to 48 hours postinjury, with the most common pattern being impairment on ImPACT and the SAC. Performance on the SAC and BESS at 24 to 48 hours after injury did not distinguish between those with and those without impairment on ImPACT at 5 to 7 days postinjury (χ = 5.076, P = .079) or 10 to 14 days postinjury (χ = 2.04, P = .361).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 90% of athletes were impaired on at least 1 sideline or neurocognitive measure 24 to 48 hours after sport-related concussion. Although sideline measures are useful for concussion diagnosis, they are not suitable for prognostication of impairment or the presence of symptoms 1 to 2 weeks postinjury.

摘要

背景

全面的多领域评估是运动相关脑震荡后的护理标准。然而,场边脑震荡评估工具的表现与办公室电脑化神经认知测试之间的关系很少受到关注,场边测量的预后效用也未知。

目的

评估受伤后24至48小时常用脑震荡测量方法的同时损伤情况,同时确定场边测量对受伤后急性至亚急性恢复期电脑化神经认知测试的预测效用。

设计

病例对照研究。

地点

高中和大学体育赛事。

患者或其他参与者

共有125名14至23岁(16.8±2.21岁)的高中和大学年龄运动员(85名男性,40名女性)。

主要结局指标

参与者在受伤后24至48小时接受场边脑震荡评估测量(即脑震荡后即刻评估和认知测试[ImPACT]、脑震荡标准化评估[SAC]和平衡误差评分系统[BESS]),并在受伤后5至7天和10至14天完成ImPACT和脑震荡后症状量表。结局指标为ImPACT综合指标(言语记忆、视觉记忆、反应时间、视觉运动速度)、SAC和BESS评分以及脑震荡后症状量表上的总症状评分。

结果

参与者在受伤后24至48小时的测量中表现出不同的损伤模式,最常见的模式是ImPACT和SAC损伤。受伤后24至48小时的SAC和BESS表现并不能区分受伤后5至7天(χ = 5.076,P = 0.079)或10至14天(χ = 2.04,P = 0.361)时ImPACT有无损伤的情况。

结论

超过90%的运动员在运动相关脑震荡后24至48小时至少有一项场边或神经认知测量指标受损。虽然场边测量对脑震荡诊断有用,但它们不适用于预测受伤后1至2周的损伤或症状情况。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Sport-related concussion: "how many is too many?".运动相关性脑震荡:“多少次算太多?”。
Transl Stroke Res. 2013 Aug;4(4):425-31. doi: 10.1007/s12975-012-0237-y. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验