Watson Dennis P, Shuman Valery, Kowalsky James, Golembiewski Elizabeth, Brown Molly
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Heartland Health Outreach, Midwest Harm Reduction Institute, 1207 W. Leland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60640, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2017 May 23;14(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0158-x.
Housing First is an evidence-based practice intended to serve chronically homeless individuals with co-occurring serious mental illness and substance use disorders. Despite housing active substance users, harm reduction is an often-overlooked element during the Housing First implementation process in real-world settings. In this paper, we explore the representation of the Housing First model within the open-access scholarly literature as a potential contributing factor for this oversight.
We conducted a rapid review of the US and Canadian open-access Housing First literature. We followed a document analysis approach, to form an interpretation of the articles' content related to our primary research questions.
A total of 55 articles on Housing First were included in the final analysis. Only 21 of these articles (38.1%) included explicit mention of harm reduction. Of the 34 articles that did not discuss harm reduction, 22 provided a description of the Housing First model indicating it does not require abstinence from substance use; however, descriptions did not all clearly indicate abstinence was not required beyond program entry. Additional Housing First descriptions focused on the low-barrier entry criteria and/or the intervention's client-centeredness.
Our review demonstrated a lack of both explicit mention and informed discussion of harm reduction in the Housing First literature, which is likely contributing to the Housing First research-practice gap to some degree. Future Housing First literature should accurately explain the role of harm reduction when discussing it in the context of Housing First programming, and public agencies promoting Housing First uptake should provide resources for proper implementation and monitor program fidelity to prevent model drift.
“先住房后服务”是一种循证实践,旨在为患有严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍的长期无家可归者提供服务。尽管“先住房后服务”模式接纳了仍在使用毒品的人,但在现实环境中,减少伤害是“先住房后服务”实施过程中一个经常被忽视的要素。在本文中,我们探讨了开放获取学术文献中“先住房后服务”模式的呈现方式,认为这可能是导致这种忽视的一个因素。
我们对美国和加拿大的开放获取“先住房后服务”文献进行了快速综述。我们采用文献分析方法,对与我们的主要研究问题相关的文章内容进行解读。
最终分析共纳入55篇关于“先住房后服务”的文章。其中只有21篇文章(38.1%)明确提到了减少伤害。在34篇未讨论减少伤害的文章中,有22篇对“先住房后服务”模式进行了描述,表明该模式不要求戒毒;然而,这些描述并非都明确表明除项目开始时外不需要戒毒。其他“先住房后服务”的描述则侧重于低门槛准入标准和/或干预措施以客户为中心的特点。
我们的综述表明,“先住房后服务”文献中缺乏对减少伤害的明确提及和深入讨论,这在一定程度上可能导致了“先住房后服务”研究与实践之间的差距。未来关于“先住房后服务”的文献在讨论减少伤害在“先住房后服务”项目中的作用时应准确解释,推广“先住房后服务”的公共机构应提供资源以确保正确实施,并监测项目的保真度以防止模式偏离。