Xu Jane, Adams Susan, Liu Yingrui Cyril, Karpelowsky Jonathan
The School of Women's and Children's Health, The University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
The School of Women's and Children's Health, The University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Sep;52(9):1409-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 11.
Appendectomy has remained the gold standard treatment of acute appendicitis for more than 100years. Nonoperative management (NOM) has been shown to be a valid treatment alternative for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in adults. A systematic review of available evidence comparing operative management (OM) and NOM in children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis was performed.
Systematic searches of MedLine, Embase, and a clinical trial register (https://clinicaltrials.gov/) were performed in March 2016. Only articles that studied NOM for uncomplicated appendicitis in children were included. Data generation was performed independently by two authors, and quality was assessed using the rating schema by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
15 articles were selected: four retrospective analyses, four prospective cohort studies, four prospective nonrandomized comparative trials and one randomized controlled trial (RCT). Initial success of the NOM groups (a cure within two weeks of intervention) ranged from 58 to 100%, with 0.1-31.8% recurrence at one year.
Although present literature is scarce, publications support the feasibility of further studies investigating NOM of acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children. Higher quality prospective RCTs with larger sample sizes and robust randomization methods, studying the noninferiority of NOM with antibiotics compared with OM are required to establish its utility.
This manuscript is a systematic review and thus assigned the lowest evidence used from the manuscripts analyzed which is a Level IV.
100多年来,阑尾切除术一直是急性阑尾炎的金标准治疗方法。非手术治疗(NOM)已被证明是成人急性单纯性阑尾炎的一种有效治疗选择。我们对比较急性单纯性阑尾炎患儿手术治疗(OM)和非手术治疗(NOM)的现有证据进行了系统评价。
2016年3月对医学在线数据库(MedLine)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)和一个临床试验注册库(https://clinicaltrials.gov/)进行了系统检索。仅纳入研究儿童单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗的文章。由两位作者独立进行数据收集,并使用牛津循证医学中心的评分方案评估质量。
共筛选出15篇文章:4篇回顾性分析、4篇前瞻性队列研究、4篇前瞻性非随机对照试验和1篇随机对照试验(RCT)。非手术治疗组的初始成功率(干预后两周内治愈)为58%至100%,一年复发率为0.1%至31.8%。
尽管目前的文献较少,但已有研究支持进一步开展关于儿童急性单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗的可行性研究。需要进行更高质量、样本量更大且随机化方法可靠的前瞻性随机对照试验,以研究与手术治疗相比,抗生素非手术治疗的非劣效性,从而确立其效用。
本文是一篇系统评价,因此根据所分析手稿中使用的最低证据级别进行分类,为IV级。