Suppr超能文献

Diverging views of epigenesis: the Wolff-Blumenbach debate.

作者信息

Gambarotto Andrea

机构信息

Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.

出版信息

Hist Philos Life Sci. 2017 Jun;39(2):12. doi: 10.1007/s40656-017-0138-1. Epub 2017 May 23.

Abstract

Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752-1840) is widely known as the father of German vitalism and his notion of Bildungstrieb, or nisus formativus, has been recognized as playing a key role in the debates about generation in German-speaking countries around 1800. On the other hand, Caspar Friedrich Wolff (1734-1794) was the first to employ a vitalist notion, namely that of vis essentialis, in the explanatory framework of epigenetic development. Is there a difference between Wolff's vis essentialis and Blumenbach's nisus formativus? How does this difference influence their overall understanding of the epigenetic process? The paper aims to provide an answer to these questions through the analysis of a little-known document, which contributes to shed light on a crucial chapter of the German life sciences in the late eighteenth-century, namely the decisive phase of the process that led to the formalization of biology as a unified field of inquiry at the beginning of the nineteenth century.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验