Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Institute for Implementation Scince in Population Health, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 West 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Health Economics and HIV and AIDS Research Division, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
AIDS Behav. 2018 Feb;22(2):580-592. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1783-9.
We assessed predictors of choosing self-administered oral HIV testing in the clinic with supervision versus the standard provider-administered blood test when offered the choice among 149 Kenyan truck drivers, described the types of guidance participants needed during self-testing and predictors of needing guidance. Overall, 56.38% of participants chose the self-test, 23.49% the provider-administered test, and 20.13% refused testing. In the adjusted regression models, each additional unit on the fatalism and self-efficacy scales was associated with 0.97 (p = 0.003) and 0.83 (p = 0.008) times lower odds of choosing the self-test, respectively. Overall, 52.38% of self-testers did so correctly without questions, 47.61% asked questions, and 13.10% required unsolicited correction from the provider. Each additional unit on the fatalism scale was associated with 1.07 times higher odds of asking for guidance when self-testing (p < 0.001). Self-administered oral HIV testing seems to be acceptable and feasible among Kenyan truck drivers, especially if given the opportunity to ask questions.
我们评估了在为 149 名肯尼亚卡车司机提供选择时,在诊所监督下选择自我管理的口服 HIV 检测与标准提供者管理的血液检测之间的预测因素,描述了参与者在自我检测期间需要的指导类型以及需要指导的预测因素。总体而言,56.38%的参与者选择自我检测,23.49%的参与者选择提供者管理的检测,20.13%的参与者拒绝检测。在调整后的回归模型中,宿命论和自我效能量表上的每增加一个单位,选择自我检测的几率分别降低 0.97(p=0.003)和 0.83(p=0.008)。总体而言,52.38%的自我检测者无需询问即可正确进行检测,47.61%的自我检测者询问了问题,13.10%的自我检测者需要提供者的非请求纠正。宿命论量表上的每增加一个单位,自我检测时寻求指导的可能性就会增加 1.07 倍(p<0.001)。自我管理的口服 HIV 检测在肯尼亚卡车司机中似乎是可以接受和可行的,特别是如果有机会提问的话。