Mahajan Soniya, Tilak Ragini, Kaushal Satyendra K, Mishra Rabindra N, Pandey Shyam S
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2017 Jul-Aug;83(4):436-440. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_519_16.
Worldwide, dermatophytic infections are running a chronic course either due to ineffective treatment or emerging drug resistance. In the past three decades, there has been an increase in incidence and non-responsiveness to conventional antifungals, which suggests that there is a need of antifungal sensitivity testing.
This study was aimed at identifying clinico-mycological pattern of dermatophytic infections in patients attending thedermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital, and to obtain the sensitivity pattern of isolates against six commonly used oral antifungals (fluconazole, terbinafine, itraconazole, ketoconazole, griseofulvin and voriconazole).
Patients with suspected dermatophytoses attending the outpatient department of Sir Sunderlal Hospital, Varanasi, were enrolled in the study. A detailed history, clinical examination and sample collection for mycological examinations was done. In vitro antifungal sensitivity testing was done on species isolated from culture as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute M38-A standards, with broth microdilution method.
There were 256 patients recruited in the study, with a male: female ratio of 3:1. The most commonly affected age group was 20-40 years (52.4%). Tinea corporis et cruris was the most common type observed (27.2%). Potassium hydroxide positivity was seen in 211 samples (79.6%) and culture positivity was found in 139 samples (52.4%). The most common species identified was Trichophyton mentagrophytes (75.9%). Sensitivity testing was done on fifty isolates of T. mentagrophytes. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of itraconazole, ketoconazole, terbinafine and voriconazole were comparable, while griseofulvin showed the highest minimum inhibitory concentration. Itraconazole was found to be the most effective drug, followed by ketoconazole, terbinafine and fluconazole. Griseofulvin was the least effective drug among the tested antifungals.
This is a hospital-based study, and may not reflect the true pattern in the community. Sensitivity pattern of only one species T. mentagrophytes was carried out.
Inadequate and irregular use of antifungal drugs has led to the emergence of resistant strains, which cause poor treatment outcomes. Thus, it is very important to test for antifungal sensitivity to check for resistance to antifungals.
在全球范围内,由于治疗无效或出现耐药性,皮肤癣菌感染呈慢性病程。在过去三十年中,传统抗真菌药物的发病率和无反应性有所增加,这表明需要进行抗真菌药敏试验。
本研究旨在确定三级护理医院皮肤科门诊患者皮肤癣菌感染的临床真菌学模式,并获得分离株对六种常用口服抗真菌药物(氟康唑、特比萘芬、伊曲康唑、酮康唑、灰黄霉素和伏立康唑)的药敏模式。
纳入瓦拉纳西苏德拉尔爵士医院门诊疑似皮肤癣菌病的患者。进行了详细的病史、临床检查和真菌学检查样本采集。根据临床和实验室标准协会M38 - A标准,采用肉汤微量稀释法对培养分离出的菌种进行体外抗真菌药敏试验。
本研究共招募了256名患者,男女比例为3:1。最常受影响的年龄组为20 - 40岁(52.4%)。体股癣是最常见的类型(27.2%)。211份样本(79.6%)氢氧化钾阳性,139份样本(52.4%)培养阳性。鉴定出的最常见菌种是须癣毛癣菌(75.9%)。对50株须癣毛癣菌进行了药敏试验。伊曲康唑、酮康唑、特比萘芬和伏立康唑最低抑菌浓度相当,而灰黄霉素最低抑菌浓度最高。伊曲康唑被发现是最有效的药物,其次是酮康唑、特比萘芬和氟康唑。灰黄霉素是受试抗真菌药物中最无效的药物。
这是一项基于医院的研究,可能无法反映社区的真实情况。仅对须癣毛癣菌这一种菌种进行了药敏模式研究。
抗真菌药物使用不足和不规范导致耐药菌株出现,从而导致治疗效果不佳。因此,检测抗真菌药敏以检查对抗真菌药物的耐药性非常重要。