Boos C J, Vincent E, Mellor A, Woods D R, New C, Cruttenden R, Barlow M, Cooke M, Deighton K, Scott P, Clarke S, O'Hara J
Department of Cardiology, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds Beckett and Bournemouth Universities, Poole, UK.
Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
J Hum Hypertens. 2017 Nov;31(11):715-719. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2017.40. Epub 2017 May 25.
Central arterial systolic blood pressure (SBP) and arterial stiffness are known to be better predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcomes than brachial SBP. The effect of progressive high altitude (HA) on these parameters has not been examined. Ninety healthy adults were included. Central BP and the augmentation index (AI) were measured at the level of the brachial artery (Uscom BP device) at <200 m and at 3619, 4600 and 5140 m. The average age of the subjects (70% men) were 32.2±8.7 years. Compared with central arterial pressures, brachial SBP (+8.1±6.4 mm Hg; P<0.0001) and pulse pressure (+10.9±6.6 mm Hg; P<0.0001) were significantly higher and brachial diastolic BP was lower (-2.8±1.6 mm Hg; P<0.0001). Compared with <200 m, HA led to a significant increase in brachial and central SBP. Central SBP correlated with AI (r=0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.58; P<0.0001) and age (r=0.32; 95% CI: 21-0.41; P<0.001). AI positively correlated with age (r=0.39; P<0.001) and inversely with subject height (r=-0.22; P<0.0001), weight (r=-0.19; P=0.006) and heart rate (r=-0.49; P<0.0001). There was no relationship between acute mountain sickness scores (Lake Louis Scoring System (LLS)) and AI or central BP. The independent predictors of central SBP were male sex (coefficient, t=4.7; P<0.0001), age (t=3.6; P=0.004) and AI (t=7.5; P<0.0001; overall r=0.40; P<0.0001). Subject height (t=2.4; P=0.02), age (7.4; P<0.0001) and heart rate (t=11.4; P<0.0001) were the only independent predictors of AI (overall r=0.43; P<0.0001). Central BP and AI significantly increase at HA. This rise was influenced by subject-related factors and heart rate but not independently by altitude, LLS or SpO.
已知中心动脉收缩压(SBP)和动脉僵硬度比肱动脉SBP能更好地预测不良心血管结局。海拔高度(HA)逐渐升高对这些参数的影响尚未得到研究。纳入了90名健康成年人。在海拔<200米以及3619米、4600米和5140米处,使用Uscom血压测量仪在肱动脉水平测量中心血压和增强指数(AI)。受试者的平均年龄(70%为男性)为32.2±8.7岁。与中心动脉压相比,肱动脉SBP(+8.1±6.4毫米汞柱;P<0.0001)和脉压(+10.9±6.6毫米汞柱;P<0.0001)显著更高,而肱动脉舒张压更低(-2.8±1.6毫米汞柱;P<0.0001)。与<200米时相比,HA导致肱动脉和中心SBP显著升高。中心SBP与AI(r=0.50;95%置信区间(CI):0.41 - 0.58;P<0.0001)和年龄(r=0.32;95%CI:21 - 0.41;P<0.001)相关。AI与年龄呈正相关(r=0.39;P<0.001),与受试者身高呈负相关(r=-0.22;P<0.0001)、体重(r=-0.19;P=0.006)和心率(r=-0.49;P<0.0001)。急性高原病评分(路易斯湖评分系统(LLS))与AI或中心血压之间无关联。中心SBP的独立预测因素为男性(系数,t=4.7;P<0.0001)、年龄(t=3.6;P=0.004)和AI(t=7.5;P<0.0001;总体r=0.40;P<0.0001)。受试者身高(t=2.4;P=0.02)、年龄(7.4;P<0.0001)和心率(t=11.4;P<0.0001)是AI的唯一独立预测因素(总体r=0.43;P<0.0001)。在HA时,中心血压和AI显著升高。这种升高受受试者相关因素和心率影响,但不受海拔、LLS或血氧饱和度独立影响。