Suppr超能文献

评估中国学校甲型H1N1流感暴发常见防控措施的效果:一项建模研究。

Evaluating the effects of common control measures for influenza A (H1N1) outbreak at school in China: A modeling study.

作者信息

Chen Tianmu, Huang Yuanxiu, Liu Ruchun, Xie Zhi, Chen Shuilian, Hu Guoqing

机构信息

Office for Disease Control and Emergency Response, Changsha Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, China.

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistic, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 19;12(5):e0177672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177672. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Influenza A (H1N1) outbreaks have become common at schools in China since 2009. However, the effects of common countermeasures for school influenza outbreak have not been quantified so far, including isolation, vaccination, antivirus and school closure. We conducted a mathematically modeling study to address this unsolved issue.

METHODS

We collected data of all small-scale school outbreaks caused by influenza A that occurred in Changsha city between January 2009 and December 2013. Two outbreaks (one was in 2009 and the other one was in 2013) were used for simulating the effects of single and combined use of common measures, including isolation (Iso), therapeutics (T), prophylactics (P), vaccinating 70% of susceptible individuals prior to the outbreak (VP70), vaccinating 70% of susceptible individuals every day during the outbreak (VD70) and school closure of one week (S1w). A susceptible-exposed-infectious/asymptomatic-recovered (SEIR) model was developed to implement the simulations based on the natural history of influenza A.

RESULTS

When no control measures are taken, the influenza is expected to spread quickly at school for the selected outbreak in 2013; the outbreak would last 56 days, and the total attack rate (TAR) would reach up to 46.32% (95% CI: 46.12-46.52). Of all single control measures, VP70 is most effective to control the epidemic (TAR = 8.68%), followed by VP50, VD70, VD50 and Iso. The use of VP70 with any other measure can reduce TAR to 3.37-14.04% and showed better effects than any other combination of two kinds of measures. The best two-measure combination is 'S1w+VP70' (TAR = 3.37%, DO = 41 days). All combinations of three kinds of measures were not satisfactory when Vp70 and VD70 were excluded. The most effective three-intervention combination was 'Iso+S1w+VP70' (with TAR = 3.23%). When VP70 or VD70 is included, the combinations of four or five kinds of interventions are very effective, reducing TAR to lower than 5%. But the TAR of combination of 'T+P+Iso+S1w' is 23.20%. Similar simulation results were observed for the selected outbreak in 2009.

CONCLUSION

Vaccinating no less than 70% of individuals prior to the outbreak and isolation are recommended as single measures to control H1N1outbreak at school. The combination of VP70+S1w can achieve very good control for school outbreak.

摘要

背景

自2009年以来,甲型H1N1流感疫情在中国学校中已屡见不鲜。然而,目前尚未对学校流感疫情的常见应对措施(包括隔离、疫苗接种、抗病毒治疗及学校停课)的效果进行量化评估。我们开展了一项数学建模研究以解决这一未决问题。

方法

我们收集了2009年1月至2013年12月间发生在长沙市的所有由甲型流感引起的小规模学校疫情数据。选取两次疫情(一次在2009年,另一次在2013年)来模拟单一及联合使用常见措施的效果,这些措施包括隔离(Iso)、治疗(T)、预防(P)、在疫情暴发前为70%的易感个体接种疫苗(VP70)、在疫情暴发期间每天为70%的易感个体接种疫苗(VD70)以及学校停课一周(S1w)。基于甲型流感的自然病程建立了易感-暴露-感染/无症状-康复(SEIR)模型来进行模拟。

结果

对于2013年选定的疫情,若不采取控制措施,预计流感将在学校迅速传播;疫情将持续56天,总发病率(TAR)将高达46.32%(95%可信区间:46.12 - 46.52)。在所有单一控制措施中,VP70对控制疫情最为有效(TAR = 8.68%),其次是VP50、VD70、VD50和Iso。VP70与其他任何措施联合使用可将TAR降至3.37% - 14.04%,且效果优于其他任何两种措施的组合。最佳的两种措施组合是“S1w + VP70”(TAR = 3.37%,病程缩短天数DO = 41天)。当排除Vp70和VD70时,所有三种措施的组合均不尽人意。最有效的三种干预措施组合是“Iso + S1w + VP70”(TAR = 3.23%)。当纳入VP70或VD70时,四种或五种干预措施的组合非常有效,可将TAR降至5%以下。但“T + P + Iso + S1w”组合的TAR为23.20%。对于2009年选定的疫情,观察到了类似的模拟结果。

结论

建议将在疫情暴发前为不少于70%的个体接种疫苗及隔离作为控制学校甲型H1N1流感疫情的单一措施。VP70 + S1w组合可实现对学校疫情的良好控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a48a/5438140/11c1d7aa8b3d/pone.0177672.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验