Kim Seung-Chan, Lim Young-Wook, Kwon Soon-Yong, Jo Woo-Lam, Ju Sung-Hun, Park Chan-Joo, Lee Choong-Woo, Kim Yong-Sik
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
PLoS One. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0178300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178300. eCollection 2017.
After total hip arthroplasty (THA), restoration of hip center of rotation (COR) is essential to ensure stability of the prosthetic hip and longevity of the prosthesis. Our aim was to determine whether, and how, the COR changed postoperatively compared to the native COR following implantation of a cementless acetabular component in anatomical position and to compare the accuracy of cup placement between two surgeons with different levels of surgical experience.
We evaluated 145 patients (145 hips) who underwent unilateral primary THA, who had no distorted acetabulum on the affected hip and a normal contralateral hip. Hip reconstruction was radiologically and clinically assessed at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Perioperative change in COR, initial cup position, offset, leg-length discrepancy (LLD), radiographic cup orientation, Harris Hip Score (HHS), component loosening, and dislocations were compared between the highly experienced surgeon and less-experienced surgeon groups.
The COR was significantly displaced in the superior and medial directions postoperatively. Significant differences were identified in the vertical COR change, initial cup position, LLD, cup inclination, and cups within safe zones, but not in the horizontal COR change, offset parameters, cup anteversion, or HHS. There were no radiographic evidence of component loosening in both groups, but three dislocations (7%) only in the group operated on by the less-experienced surgeon (p = 0.027).
We found that the postoperative COR tended to be displaced in the superior and medial directions, and that the level of surgical experience strongly affected the accuracy and consistency of cup placement, particularly in COR position and cup inclination.
全髋关节置换术(THA)后,恢复髋关节旋转中心(COR)对于确保人工髋关节的稳定性和假体的使用寿命至关重要。我们的目的是确定在解剖位置植入非骨水泥髋臼组件后,与天然COR相比,COR术后是否发生变化以及如何变化,并比较两位手术经验不同的外科医生之间髋臼杯放置的准确性。
我们评估了145例接受单侧初次THA的患者(145髋),这些患者患侧髋关节髋臼无畸形且对侧髋关节正常。在至少2年的随访中对髋关节重建进行影像学和临床评估。比较经验丰富的外科医生组和经验较少的外科医生组之间COR的围手术期变化、初始髋臼杯位置、偏移、肢体长度差异(LLD)、影像学髋臼杯方向、Harris髋关节评分(HHS)、组件松动和脱位情况。
术后COR在上方和内侧方向明显移位。在垂直COR变化、初始髋臼杯位置、LLD、髋臼杯倾斜度和安全区内的髋臼杯方面发现了显著差异,但在水平COR变化、偏移参数、髋臼杯前倾角或HHS方面没有差异。两组均无组件松动的影像学证据,但仅在经验较少的外科医生手术的组中有3例脱位(7%)(p = 0.027)。
我们发现术后COR倾向于在上方和内侧方向移位,并且手术经验水平强烈影响髋臼杯放置的准确性和一致性,特别是在COR位置和髋臼杯倾斜度方面。