Suppr超能文献

针对患有痴呆症的养老院居民的运动或社交干预:一项试点随机对照试验。

Exercise or Social Intervention for Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial.

作者信息

de Souto Barreto Philipe, Cesari Matteo, Denormandie Philippe, Armaingaud Didier, Vellas Bruno, Rolland Yves

机构信息

Gérontopôle de Toulouse, Institut du Vieillissement, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

UMR INSERM 1027, University of Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Sep;65(9):E123-E129. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14947. Epub 2017 May 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of exercise with those of a structured nonphysical intervention on ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and physical and cognitive function of persons with dementia (PWDs) living in nursing homes (NH).

DESIGN

Cluster-randomized pilot-controlled trial.

SETTING

Seven French NHs.

PARTICIPANTS

PWDs living in NHs.

MEASUREMENTS

NHs were randomized to an exercise group (4 NHs, n = 47) or structured social activity group (3 NHs, n = 50) for a 24-week intervention performed twice per week for 60 minutes per session. The main endpoint was ADL performance (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory for Severe Alzheimer's Disease Scale (ADCS-ADL-sev); range 0-54, higher is better); secondary endpoints were overall cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)) and performance-based tests of physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), usual gait speed).

RESULTS

Ninety-one participants with at least one postbaseline ADL assessment were included in efficacy analysis. Groups differed at baseline in terms of sex, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and nutritional status. Multilevel analysis adjusted for baseline differences between groups found no significant difference between effects of exercise and social activity (group-by-time interaction), with adjusted mean differences at 6 months of 1.9 points for ADCS-ADL-sev and 0.55 points for MMSE favoring social activity and 0.6 points for SPPB and 0.05 m/s favoring exercise. Adverse events did not differ between groups, except that the social activity group had more falls than the exercise group.

CONCLUSION

A larger, longer trial is required to determine whether exercise has greater health benefits than nonphysical interventions for institutionalized PWDs.

摘要

目的

比较运动与结构化非身体干预对疗养院中痴呆症患者(PWDs)日常生活活动能力(ADLs)以及身体和认知功能的影响。

设计

整群随机试点对照试验。

地点

法国的七家疗养院。

参与者

居住在疗养院的痴呆症患者。

测量指标

疗养院被随机分为运动组(4家疗养院,n = 47)或结构化社交活动组(3家疗养院,n = 50),进行为期24周的干预,每周进行两次,每次60分钟。主要终点是ADL表现(严重阿尔茨海默病日常生活活动能力合作研究量表(ADCS-ADL-sev);范围0 - 54,分数越高越好);次要终点是整体认知功能(简易精神状态检查表(MMSE))和基于表现的身体功能测试(简短身体表现量表(SPPB)、通常步态速度)。

结果

91名至少有一次基线后ADL评估的参与者纳入疗效分析。两组在基线时的性别、神经精神症状和营养状况方面存在差异。对组间基线差异进行调整的多水平分析发现,运动和社交活动的效果之间无显著差异(组×时间交互作用),6个月时调整后的平均差异为:ADCS-ADL-sev社交活动组比运动组高1.9分,MMSE社交活动组比运动组高0.55分,SPPB运动组比社交活动组高0.6分,步态速度运动组比社交活动组快0.05m/s。除社交活动组跌倒次数多于运动组外,两组不良事件无差异。

结论

需要进行更大规模、更长时间的试验来确定对于机构化的痴呆症患者,运动是否比非身体干预具有更大的健康益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验