Geerligs Linda, Tsvetanov Kamen A, Henson Richard N
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN), University of Cambridge and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Aug;38(8):4125-4156. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23653. Epub 2017 May 23.
Many studies report individual differences in functional connectivity, such as those related to age. However, estimates of connectivity from fMRI are confounded by other factors, such as vascular health, head motion and changes in the location of functional regions. Here, we investigate the impact of these confounds, and pre-processing strategies that can mitigate them, using data from the Cambridge Centre for Ageing & Neuroscience (www.cam-can.com). This dataset contained two sessions of resting-state fMRI from 214 adults aged 18-88. Functional connectivity between all regions was strongly related to vascular health, most likely reflecting respiratory and cardiac signals. These variations in mean connectivity limit the validity of between-participant comparisons of connectivity estimates, and were best mitigated by regression of mean connectivity over participants. We also showed that high-pass filtering, instead of band-pass filtering, produced stronger and more reliable age-effects. Head motion was correlated with gray-matter volume in selected brain regions, and with various cognitive measures, suggesting that it has a biological (trait) component, and warning against regressing out motion over participants. Finally, we showed that the location of functional regions was more variable in older adults, which was alleviated by smoothing the data, or using a multivariate measure of connectivity. These results demonstrate that analysis choices have a dramatic impact on connectivity differences between individuals, ultimately affecting the associations found between connectivity and cognition. It is important that fMRI connectivity studies address these issues, and we suggest a number of ways to optimize analysis choices. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4125-4156, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
许多研究报告了功能连接性方面的个体差异,比如与年龄相关的差异。然而,功能磁共振成像(fMRI)得出的连接性估计值会受到其他因素的干扰,如血管健康状况、头部运动以及功能区域位置的变化。在此,我们利用来自剑桥衰老与神经科学中心(www.cam-can.com)的数据,研究这些干扰因素的影响以及能够减轻它们的预处理策略。该数据集包含了214名年龄在18 - 88岁成年人的两期静息态fMRI数据。所有区域之间的功能连接性与血管健康状况密切相关,很可能反映了呼吸和心脏信号。平均连接性的这些变化限制了连接性估计值在参与者之间比较的有效性,通过对参与者的平均连接性进行回归分析能最好地减轻这种影响。我们还表明,高通滤波而非带通滤波产生了更强且更可靠的年龄效应。头部运动与选定脑区的灰质体积以及各种认知指标相关,这表明它具有生物学(特质)成分,并警示不要对参与者的运动进行回归分析。最后,我们表明功能区域的位置在老年人中变化更大,通过对数据进行平滑处理或使用连接性的多变量测量可以缓解这一情况。这些结果表明分析选择对个体之间的连接性差异有显著影响,最终影响在连接性与认知之间发现的关联。功能磁共振成像连接性研究解决这些问题很重要,我们提出了一些优化分析选择的方法。《人类大脑图谱》38:4125 - 4156,2017年。© 2017威利期刊公司