Giles Gregory I, Nasim Muhammad Jawad, Ali Wesam, Jacob Claus
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Division of Bioorganic Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Saarland University, Campus B2 1, Saarbruecken D-66123, Germany.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2017 May 23;6(2):38. doi: 10.3390/antiox6020038.
Fifteen years ago, in 2001, the concept of "Reactive Sulfur Species" or RSS was advocated as a working hypothesis. Since then various organic as well as inorganic RSS have attracted considerable interest and stimulated many new and often unexpected avenues in research and product development. During this time, it has become apparent that molecules with sulfur-containing functional groups are not just the passive "victims" of oxidative stress or simple conveyors of signals in cells, but can also be stressors in their own right, with pivotal roles in cellular function and homeostasis. Many "exotic" sulfur-based compounds, often of natural origin, have entered the fray in the context of nutrition, ageing, chemoprevention and therapy. In parallel, the field of inorganic RSS has come to the forefront of research, with short-lived yet metabolically important intermediates, such as various sulfur-nitrogen species and polysulfides (S), playing important roles. Between 2003 and 2005 several breath-taking discoveries emerged characterising unusual sulfur redox states in biology, and since then the truly unique role of sulfur-dependent redox systems has become apparent. Following these discoveries, over the last decade a "hunt" and, more recently, mining for such modifications has begun-and still continues-often in conjunction with new, innovative and complex labelling and analytical methods to capture the (entire) sulfur "redoxome". A key distinction for RSS is that, unlike oxygen or nitrogen, sulfur not only forms a plethora of specific reactive species, but sulfur also targets itself, as sulfur containing molecules, i.e., peptides, proteins and enzymes, preferentially react with RSS. Not surprisingly, today this sulfur-centred redox signalling and control inside the living cell is a burning issue, which has moved on from the predominantly thiol/disulfide biochemistry of the past to a complex labyrinth of interacting signalling and control pathways which involve various sulfur oxidation states, sulfur species and reactions. RSS are omnipresent and, in some instances, are even considered as the true bearers of redox control, perhaps being more important than the Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) or Reactive Nitrogen Species (RNS) which for decades have dominated the redox field. In other(s) words, in 2017, sulfur redox is "on the rise", and the idea of RSS resonates throughout the Life Sciences. Still, the RSS story isn't over yet. Many RSS are at the heart of "mistaken identities" which urgently require clarification and may even provide the foundations for further scientific revolutions in the years to come. In light of these developments, it is therefore the perfect time to revisit the original hypotheses, to select highlights in the field and to question and eventually update our concept of "Reactive Sulfur Species".
十五年前,即2001年,“反应性硫物种”(RSS)的概念作为一个工作假设被提出。从那时起,各种有机和无机的RSS引起了相当大的关注,并在研究和产品开发中激发了许多新的、常常出人意料的途径。在此期间,很明显含硫官能团的分子不仅是氧化应激的被动“受害者”或细胞中信号的简单传递者,而且本身也可以成为应激源,在细胞功能和内环境稳定中起关键作用。许多通常源自天然的“奇特”硫基化合物已在营养、衰老、化学预防和治疗等方面进入了竞争领域。与此同时,无机RSS领域已成为研究的前沿,一些寿命短但具有重要代谢意义的中间体,如各种硫氮物种和多硫化物(S),发挥着重要作用。在2003年至2005年期间,出现了几项惊人的发现,揭示了生物学中不寻常的硫氧化还原状态,从那时起,硫依赖性氧化还原系统真正独特的作用变得明显。在这些发现之后,在过去十年里,一场对这种修饰的“搜寻”,以及最近的挖掘已经开始——并且仍在继续——通常与新的、创新的和复杂的标记及分析方法相结合,以捕获(整个)硫“氧化还原组 ”。RSS的一个关键区别在于,与氧或氮不同,硫不仅能形成大量特定的反应性物种,而且硫还以自身为目标,因为含硫分子,即肽、蛋白质和酶,优先与RSS反应。毫不奇怪,如今活细胞内这种以硫为中心的氧化还原信号传导和控制是一个紧迫的问题,它已从过去主要的硫醇/二硫键生物化学发展到一个由涉及各种硫氧化态、硫物种和反应的相互作用的信号传导和控制途径组成的复杂迷宫。RSS无处不在,在某些情况下,甚至被认为是氧化还原控制的真正承担者,可能比几十年来主导氧化还原领域的活性氧(ROS)或活性氮(RNS)更重要。换句话说,在2017年,硫氧化还原“正在兴起”,RSS的概念在整个生命科学领域引起共鸣。然而,RSS的故事还没有结束。许多RSS处于“身份错误”的核心,这迫切需要澄清,甚至可能为未来几年的进一步科学革命奠定基础。鉴于这些发展,因此现在是重新审视原始假设、挑选该领域的亮点、质疑并最终更新我们的“反应性硫物种”概念的绝佳时机。