Suppr超能文献

无急性冠状动脉综合征患者中心肌肌钙蛋白T和肌钙蛋白I的直接比较:一项系统评价

Head-to-head comparison of cardiac troponin T and troponin I in patients without acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review.

作者信息

Árnadóttir Ásthildur, Falk Klein Christine, Iversen Kasper

机构信息

a Department of Cardiology , Herlev-Gentofte Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark.

出版信息

Biomarkers. 2017 Dec;22(8):701-708. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2017.1335779. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac-specific troponin T (cTnT) and troponin I (cTnI) are considered diagnostically equal in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this systematic review was to compare the prevalence and prognostic strength of elevations of cTnT and cTnI in patients with other conditions than ACS.

METHODS

A systemic review was conducted in concordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The studies were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register, from May to August 2016. Studies measuring both cTnT and cTnI in populations without ACS were eligible.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were included (n = 25,859). Seventeen studies reported on prognostic information with follow-up time ranging for 30 d-5 years. Elevation above the 99th percentile (reference value for a healthy population) in non-ACS population was reported to be 0-39% for cTnI and 40-100% for cTnT. Elevation of cTnT tends to be a superior predictor for all-cause mortality and elevation of cTnI tends to be a superior predictor for cardiovascular related mortality.

DISCUSSION

In the absence of ACS, elevation of cTnT is more frequent than elevation of cTnI.

CONCLUSION

Both cTnT and cTnI elevations have important prognostic information regarding morbidity, cardiac mortality and all-cause mortality.

摘要

背景

在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,心脏特异性肌钙蛋白T(cTnT)和肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)在诊断上被认为是等效的。本系统评价的目的是比较cTnT和cTnI升高在ACS以外其他疾病患者中的发生率及预后强度。

方法

按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。通过检索2016年5月至8月的PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane中央登记库来确定研究。纳入测量非ACS人群中cTnT和cTnI两者的研究。

结果

共纳入29项研究(n = 25859)。17项研究报告了预后信息,随访时间为30天至5年。在非ACS人群中,cTnI高于第99百分位数(健康人群参考值)的升高率为0%至39%,cTnT为40%至100%。cTnT升高往往是全因死亡率的更好预测指标,而cTnI升高往往是心血管相关死亡率的更好预测指标。

讨论

在无ACS的情况下,cTnT升高比cTnI升高更常见。

结论

cTnT和cTnI升高均具有关于发病率、心脏死亡率和全因死亡率的重要预后信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验