Koellensperger Eva, Bonnert Lilly-Claire, Zoernig Inka, Marmé Frederik, Sandmann Stefanie, Germann Günter, Gramley Felix, Leimer Uwe
Clinic for Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Spine, Orthopedic and Hand Surgery - ETHIANUM, Vossstraße 6, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017 May 25;8(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0579-1.
In this study we evaluated the interactions of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and different human breast cancer cell lines (BRCAs) with regard to the safety of cell-assisted lipotransfers for breast reconstruction and a thereby unintended co-localization of ADSCs and BRCAs.
ADSCs were co-cultured with five different human BRCAs (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, ZR-75-30, and EVSA-T) and primary BRCAs from one patient in a transwell system, and cell-cell-interactions were analyzed by assessing doubling time, migration and invasion, angiogenesis, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of more than 300 tumor-associated genes, and multiplex protein assays of 20 chemokines and growth factors and eight matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Results of co-culture were compared to those of the respective monoculture.
Quantitative real-time PCR revealed remarkable changes in the expression of multiple tumor-associated genes in co-culture compared to monocultures of both ADSCs and BRCAs. Concomitantly, the concentration of several tumor-associated proteins, such as cytokines and MMPs, were strongly increased in co-culture. Furthermore, exclusively in co-culture with ADSCs, the different BRCAs were exposed to several important tumor-modulating proteins, such as CCL2, HGF, or interleukins. Co-culture did not significantly affect cellular proliferation of either ADSCs or BRCAs (p > 0.05). The migration of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 BRCAs was significantly increased in co-culture with ADSCs by a mean of 11% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.04 and 0.012), as well as that of ADSCs in co-culture with MDA-MB-231, ZR-75-30, and EVSA-T (+11-15%, p = 0.035-0.045). Co-culture with MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, and EVSA-T BRCAs significantly increased the invasive behavior of ADSCs by a mean of 24-41% (p = 0.014-0.039). There were no significant differences in the in vitro invasive properties of BRCAs in co-culture compared to monoculture. An in vitro angiogenesis assay revealed an increased tube formation of conditioned media from co-cultured BRCAs and ADSCs compared to the respective monocultures.
This study further elucidates the possible interactions of primary human ADSCs with human BRCAs, pointing towards a potential increased oncological risk which should not be neglected when considering a clinical use of cell-assisted lipoaspirates in breast reconstruction.
在本研究中,我们评估了人脂肪组织来源干细胞(ADSCs)与不同人乳腺癌细胞系(BRCAs)之间的相互作用,涉及细胞辅助脂肪移植用于乳房重建的安全性以及由此导致的ADSCs与BRCAs意外共定位问题。
将ADSCs与五种不同的人BRCAs(MCF-7、MDA-MB-231、SK-BR-3、ZR-75-30和EVSA-T)以及来自一名患者的原发性BRCAs在Transwell系统中共培养,并通过评估倍增时间、迁移和侵袭、血管生成、300多个肿瘤相关基因的定量实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)以及20种趋化因子和生长因子及8种基质金属蛋白酶(MMPs)的多重蛋白质分析来分析细胞间相互作用。将共培养结果与各自的单培养结果进行比较。
定量实时PCR显示,与ADSCs和BRCAs的单培养相比,共培养中多个肿瘤相关基因的表达有显著变化。同时,共培养中几种肿瘤相关蛋白(如细胞因子和MMPs)的浓度大幅增加。此外,仅在与ADSCs共培养时,不同的BRCAs会接触到几种重要的肿瘤调节蛋白,如CCL2、HGF或白细胞介素。共培养对ADSCs或BRCAs的细胞增殖均无显著影响(p>0.05)。与ADSCs共培养时,MCF-7和MDA-MB-231 BRCAs的迁移分别显著增加了11%和23%(p=0.04和0.012),与MDA-MB-231、ZR-75-30和EVSA-T共培养时ADSCs的迁移也增加了11%-15%(p=0.035-0.045)。与MDA-MB-231、SK-BR-3和EVSA-T BRCAs共培养显著增加了ADSCs的侵袭行为,平均增加了24%-41%(p=0.014-0.039)。与单培养相比,共培养中BRCAs的体外侵袭特性无显著差异。体外血管生成分析显示,与各自的单培养相比,共培养的BRCAs和ADSCs条件培养基的管形成增加。
本研究进一步阐明了原代人ADSCs与人类BRCAs之间可能的相互作用,表明存在潜在的肿瘤风险增加,在考虑将细胞辅助脂肪抽吸物用于乳房重建的临床应用时不应忽视这一点。