Bryson-Morrison Nicola, Tzanopoulos Joseph, Matsuzawa Tetsuro, Humle Tatyana
School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NR UK.
Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NR UK.
Int J Primatol. 2017;38(2):282-302. doi: 10.1007/s10764-016-9947-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Many primate populations inhabit anthropogenic landscapes. Understanding their long-term ability to persist in such environments and associated real and perceived risks for both primates and people is essential for effective conservation planning. Primates in forest-agricultural mosaics often consume cultivars to supplement their diet, leading to potentially negative encounters with farmers. When crossing roads, primates also face the risk of encounters with people and collision with vehicles. Chimpanzees () in Bossou, Guinea, West Africa, face such risks regularly. In this study, we aimed to examine their activity budget across habitat types and the influence of anthropogenic risks associated with cultivated fields, roads, and paths on their foraging behavior in noncultivated habitat. We conducted 6-h morning or afternoon follows daily from April 2012 to March 2013. Chimpanzees preferentially used forest habitat types for traveling and resting and highly disturbed habitat types for socializing. Wild fruit and crop availability influenced seasonal habitat use for foraging. Overall, chimpanzees preferred mature forest for all activities. They showed a significant preference for foraging at >200 m from cultivated fields compared to 0-100 m and 101-200 m, with no effect of habitat type or season, suggesting an influence of associated risk. Nevertheless, the chimpanzees did not actively avoid foraging close to roads and paths. Our study reveals chimpanzee reliance on different habitat types and the influence of human-induced pressures on their activities. Such information is critical for the establishment of effective land use management strategies in anthropogenic landscapes.
许多灵长类动物种群栖息在人为景观中。了解它们在这类环境中长期生存的能力以及灵长类动物和人类面临的相关实际和感知风险,对于有效的保护规划至关重要。森林 - 农业镶嵌区域中的灵长类动物常常食用农作物品种来补充饮食,这可能导致与农民产生负面冲突。在穿越道路时,灵长类动物还面临与人相遇以及与车辆碰撞的风险。西非几内亚博苏的黑猩猩经常面临此类风险。在本研究中,我们旨在研究它们在不同栖息地类型中的活动预算,以及与耕地、道路和小径相关的人为风险对它们在非耕地栖息地觅食行为的影响。我们在2012年4月至2013年3月期间,每天上午或下午进行6小时的跟踪观察。黑猩猩优先选择森林栖息地类型用于移动和休息,而选择受高度干扰的栖息地类型用于社交。野生水果和农作物的可获取性影响了季节性觅食栖息地的使用。总体而言,黑猩猩在所有活动中都更喜欢成熟森林。与距离耕地0 - 100米和101 - 200米相比,它们在距离耕地>200米处觅食表现出显著偏好,且不受栖息地类型或季节的影响,这表明存在相关风险的影响。然而,黑猩猩并没有主动避免在靠近道路和小径的地方觅食。我们的研究揭示了黑猩猩对不同栖息地类型的依赖以及人为压力对它们活动的影响。这些信息对于在人为景观中制定有效的土地利用管理策略至关重要。