Suppr超能文献

由共享的食果鸟类介导的杜松与槲寄生之间相互作用的变化:从寄生到潜在的互利共生。

Changes in interactions between juniper and mistletoe mediated by shared avian frugivores: parasitism to potential mutualism.

作者信息

van Ommeren Ron J, Whitham Thomas G

机构信息

Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research and Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 86001, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2002 Jan;130(2):281-288. doi: 10.1007/s004420100792. Epub 2002 Jan 1.

Abstract

Although mistletoe is typically viewed as a parasite of juniper in a two-way interaction, its role may become neutral or even mutualistic when their common avian seed dispersing agents are considered as a three-way interaction. In the study area, wintering avian frugivores forage on both one-seed juniper (Juniperus monosperma) berries and on the fruit of its associated mistletoe (Phoradendron juniperinum). Three major findings emerged from our studies that support a three-way interaction and the hypothesis of conditional interactions. First, mistletoes provide a stable resource for shared avian seed dispersers; junipers do not. Whereas juniper berry production varied 10- to 15-fold over the 3 years of our study, mistletoe fruit abundance did not vary significantly. Second, the abundance of avian seed dispersal agents, such as Townsend's solitaires (Myadestes townsendi), is strongly tied to the abundance of juniper berries in mast years and mistletoe fruits in all years. In fact, the best overall predictor of their common avian seed dispersal agents was the abundance of mistletoe; stands with mistletoe attracted up to 3 times more avian frugivores than stands with little or no mistletoe. Thus, mistletoe berries can serve as the main attractor for birds that disperse juniper berries. Third, in agreement with the hypothesis that mistletoe can benefit junipers by attracting and supporting greater populations of avian seed dispersal agents, the number of juniper seedlings was more than 2-fold greater in stands with high mistletoe density compared with stands that had little or no mistletoe. Results suggest that the occurrence of a three-way interaction, in the presence of environmental variation (in this case, annual variation in juniper berry crops), may change the ecological roles of associated species. A conceptual model is presented to illustrate how the role of mistletoe may range from parasitic to mutualistic, while the role of avian seed dispersers may conversely range from mutualistic to parasitic, the latter by acting as vectors for the spread of mistletoe.

摘要

尽管在双向相互作用中,槲寄生通常被视为杜松的寄生虫,但当把它们共同的鸟类种子传播者考虑在内形成三方相互作用时,槲寄生的作用可能会变得中立甚至互利共生。在研究区域,越冬的食果鸟类既以单籽杜松(Juniperus monosperma)的浆果为食,也以其伴生的槲寄生(Phoradendron juniperinum)的果实为食。我们的研究得出了三个主要发现,支持了三方相互作用以及条件性相互作用的假设。首先,槲寄生为共享的鸟类种子传播者提供了稳定的资源;杜松则不然。在我们研究的3年里,杜松浆果产量变化了10至15倍,而槲寄生果实的丰度没有显著变化。其次,鸟类种子传播者的数量,比如汤森氏孤鸫(Myadestes townsendi),在丰年与杜松浆果的丰度紧密相关,在所有年份都与槲寄生果实的丰度紧密相关。事实上,对它们共同的鸟类种子传播者的最佳总体预测指标是槲寄生的丰度;有槲寄生的林分吸引的食果鸟类比几乎没有或没有槲寄生的林分多3倍。因此,槲寄生浆果可以成为传播杜松浆果的鸟类的主要吸引物。第三,与槲寄生可以通过吸引和支持更多数量的鸟类种子传播者而使杜松受益的假设一致,与几乎没有或没有槲寄生的林分相比,槲寄生密度高的林分中杜松幼苗的数量多出两倍多。结果表明,在存在环境变化(在这种情况下,杜松浆果作物的年度变化)时,三方相互作用的发生可能会改变相关物种的生态作用。提出了一个概念模型来说明槲寄生的作用如何从寄生转变为互利共生,而鸟类种子传播者的作用则可能相反,从互利共生转变为寄生,后者是通过充当槲寄生传播的媒介。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验