Suppr超能文献

1型糖尿病患者早晨注射德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素相比的血糖变异性:一项开放标签随机对照试验。

Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes Compared with Degludec and Glargine on the Morning Injection: An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Iga Ryo, Uchino Hiroshi, Kanazawa Ken, Usui Shuki, Miyagi Masahiko, Kumashiro Naoki, Yoshino Hiroshi, Ando Yasuyo, Hirose Takahisa

机构信息

Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2017 Aug;8(4):783-792. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0269-0. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Optimal adjustment of basal insulin to overcome hypoglycemia and glycemic variability (GV) depends on its duration of action and peak-less profile. Owing to the ability of long-acting basal insulin to avoid hypoglycemia, we titrated pre-meal glucose to normal fasting blood glucose, 80-110 mg/dL (4.5-6.1 mmol/L), and post-meal glucose to 80-140 mg/dL (4.5-7.8 mmol/L). The purpose of this study was to evaluate two basal insulin analogues degludec (IDeg) and glargine (IGlar), injected in the morning, for GV using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in type 1 diabetes (T1DM).

METHODS

In this crossover study, 20 Japanese patients with T1DM (age 54 ± 16 years, disease duration 16 ± 8 years, BMI 24 ± 4 kg/m, HbA1c 7.4 ± 0.8%) were randomized into one of two different starting regimens, and CGM was conducted on three consecutive days during the last week of each 12-week titration period. Treatment satisfaction was assessed at the end of each treatment period using the Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (DTR-QOL).

RESULTS

There were no differences in HbA1c, total insulin dosage, body weight changes, and basal to bolus ratio between the IDeg and IGlar arms. The day-to-day variability in fasting interstitial GV on the CGM curves was significantly less in the IDeg than IGlar treatment period (25.9 ± 22.0 vs. 43.8 ± 30.1 mg/dl, p = 0.04). Other markers of GV, calculated by the EasyGV software, including mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), J-index, total and nocturnal hypoglycemia were not different between the two treatment periods. The score of "satisfaction with treatment", a subdomain of the DTR-QOL system, was higher in the IDeg period.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the morning injection of the two long-acting insulin analogues seemed similar with regard to the magnitude of hypoglycemia in T1DM, but treatment with IDeg was associated with lower day-to-day variation in glucose level. These results suggest that IDeg is safe with minimal morning GV in patients with T1DM.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japanese Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000012358.

摘要

引言

基础胰岛素的最佳调整以克服低血糖和血糖变异性(GV)取决于其作用持续时间和无峰值特性。由于长效基础胰岛素具有避免低血糖的能力,我们将餐前血糖调整至正常空腹血糖水平,即80 - 110mg/dL(4.5 - 6.1mmol/L),餐后血糖调整至80 - 140mg/dL(4.5 - 7.8mmol/L)。本研究的目的是使用连续血糖监测(CGM)评估1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者在早晨注射的两种基础胰岛素类似物德谷胰岛素(IDeg)和甘精胰岛素(IGlar)对血糖变异性的影响。

方法

在这项交叉研究中,20名日本T1DM患者(年龄54±16岁,病程16±8年,体重指数24±4kg/m²,糖化血红蛋白7.4±0.8%)被随机分为两种不同的起始治疗方案之一,并在每个12周滴定期的最后一周连续三天进行CGM监测。在每个治疗期结束时,使用糖尿病治疗相关生活质量问卷(DTR - QOL)评估治疗满意度。

结果

IDeg组和IGlar组在糖化血红蛋白、总胰岛素剂量、体重变化以及基础胰岛素与餐时胰岛素比例方面均无差异。在CGM曲线上,IDeg治疗期空腹间质血糖的日间变异性显著低于IGlar治疗期(25.9±22.0 vs. 43.8±30.1mg/dl,p = 0.04)。通过EasyGV软件计算的其他血糖变异性指标,包括血糖波动平均幅度(MAGE)、J指数、总体和夜间低血糖情况,在两个治疗期之间没有差异。DTR - QOL系统的一个子领域“治疗满意度”得分在IDeg治疗期更高。

结论

因此,在T1DM患者中,早晨注射这两种长效胰岛素类似物在低血糖程度方面似乎相似,但使用IDeg治疗时血糖水平的日间变化较小。这些结果表明,IDeg对T1DM患者而言安全性良好,早晨血糖变异性最小。

临床试验注册

日本临床试验注册中心,UMIN000012358。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8400/5544606/cdcad6350cfd/13300_2017_269_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验