Hillebrand Helmut, Blenckner Thorsten
Erken Laboratory, Department of Limnology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, University of Uppsala, Norr Malma 4200, 76173, Norrtälje, Sweden.
Oecologia. 2002 Aug;132(4):479-491. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0988-3. Epub 2002 Aug 1.
The impact of regional factors (such as speciation or dispersal) on the species richness in local communities (S ) has received increasing attention. A prominent method to infer the impact of regional factors is the comparison of species richness in local assemblages (S ) with the total number of species in the region (S ). Linear relations between S and S have been interpreted as an indication of strong regional influence and weak influence of interactions within local communities. We propose that two aspects bias the outcome of such comparisons: (1) the spatial scale of local and regional sampling, and (2) the body size of the organisms. The impact of the local area reflects the scales of ecological interactions, whereas the ratio between local and regional area reflects the inherent moment of autocorrelation. A proposed impact of body size on the relation is based on the high dispersal and high abundance of small organisms. We predict strongest linearity between S and S for large organisms, for large local areas (less important ecological interactions) and for sampling designs where the local habitat area covers a high proportion of the regional area (more important autocorrelation). We conducted a meta-analysis on 63 relations obtained from the literature. As predicted, the linearity of the relationship between S and S increased with the proportion of local to regional sampling area. In contrast, neither the body size of the organisms nor the local area itself was significantly related to the relation between S and S. This indicated that ecological interactions played a minor role in the shape of local to regional richness plots, which instead was mainly influenced by the sampling design. We found that the studies published so far were highly biased towards larger organisms and towards high similarity between the local and regional area. The proposed prevalence of linear relationships may thus be an artefact and plots of S to S are not a suitable tool with which to infer the strength of local interactions.
区域因素(如物种形成或扩散)对当地群落物种丰富度(S)的影响已受到越来越多的关注。推断区域因素影响的一种重要方法是比较当地群落中的物种丰富度(S)与该区域的物种总数(S)。S与S之间的线性关系被解释为区域影响强烈而当地群落内部相互作用影响较弱的一个指标。我们认为有两个方面会使此类比较的结果产生偏差:(1)当地和区域采样的空间尺度,以及(2)生物体的体型大小。当地面积的影响反映了生态相互作用的尺度,而当地与区域面积的比率反映了自相关的内在程度。关于体型大小对这种关系的影响的一种观点是基于小型生物体具有较高的扩散能力和丰富度。我们预测,对于大型生物体、大型当地面积(生态相互作用不太重要)以及当地栖息地面积占区域面积比例较高的采样设计(自相关更重要),S与S之间的线性关系最强。我们对从文献中获得的63种关系进行了荟萃分析。正如预测的那样,S与S之间关系的线性程度随着当地与区域采样面积的比例增加而增强。相比之下,生物体的体型大小以及当地面积本身与S和S之间的关系均无显著关联。这表明生态相互作用在当地到区域丰富度图的形态中作用较小,该图主要受采样设计的影响。我们发现,迄今为止发表的研究高度偏向于大型生物体以及当地与区域面积之间的高度相似性。因此,所提出的线性关系的普遍性可能是一种假象,S对S的图并不是推断当地相互作用强度的合适工具。