Suppr超能文献

重新调整自闭症谱系障碍高功能个体的儿童自闭症评定量表韩文版的截断分数。

Re-adjusting the cut-off score of the Korean version of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale for high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;71(10):725-732. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12540. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

Abstract

AIM

The current cut-off score of the Korean version of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (K-CARS) does not seem to be sensitive enough to precisely diagnose high-functioning autism. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal cut-off score of K-CARS for diagnosing high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

METHODS

A total of 329 participants were assessed by the Korean versions of the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised (K-ADI-R), Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (K-ADOS), and K-CARS. IQ and Social Maturity Scale scores were also obtained.

RESULTS

The true positive and false negative rates of K-CARS were 77.2% and 22.8%, respectively. Verbal IQ (VIQ) and Social Quotient (SQ) were significant predictors of misclassification. The false negative rate increased to 36.0% from 19.8% when VIQ was >69.5, and the rate increased to 44.1% for participants with VIQ > 69.5 and SQ > 75.5. In addition, if SQ was >83.5, the false negative rate increased to 46.7%, even if the participant's VIQ was ≤69.5. Optimal cut-off scores were 28.5 (for VIQ ≤ 69.5 and SQ ≤ 75.5), 24.25 (for VIQ > 69.5 and SQ > 75.5), and 24.5 (for SQ > 83.5), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The likelihood of a false negative error increases when K-CARS is used to diagnose high-functioning autism and Asperger's syndrome. For subjects with ASD and substantial verbal ability, the cut-off score for K-CARS should be re-adjusted and/or supplementary diagnostic tools might be needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy for ASD.

摘要

目的

韩国版儿童自闭症评定量表(K-CARS)的现行截断分数似乎不够敏感,无法精确诊断高功能自闭症。本研究旨在确定 K-CARS 用于诊断高功能自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体的最佳截断分数。

方法

共有 329 名参与者接受了韩国版自闭症诊断访谈修订版(K-ADI-R)、自闭症诊断观察量表(K-ADOS)和 K-CARS 的评估。还获得了智商和社会成熟度量表的分数。

结果

K-CARS 的真阳性和假阴性率分别为 77.2%和 22.8%。言语智商(VIQ)和社会商数(SQ)是分类错误的显著预测因子。当 VIQ>69.5 时,假阴性率从 19.8%增加到 36.0%,而当 VIQ>69.5 和 SQ>75.5 时,假阴性率增加到 44.1%。此外,如果 SQ>83.5,即使参与者的 VIQ≤69.5,假阴性率也会增加到 46.7%。最佳截断分数分别为 28.5(对于 VIQ≤69.5 和 SQ≤75.5)、24.25(对于 VIQ>69.5 和 SQ>75.5)和 24.5(对于 SQ>83.5)。

结论

当使用 K-CARS 诊断高功能自闭症和阿斯伯格综合征时,出现假阴性错误的可能性会增加。对于 ASD 且具有较强言语能力的受试者,应重新调整 K-CARS 的截断分数,或需要补充诊断工具,以提高 ASD 的诊断准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验