• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新调整自闭症谱系障碍高功能个体的儿童自闭症评定量表韩文版的截断分数。

Re-adjusting the cut-off score of the Korean version of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale for high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;71(10):725-732. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12540. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1111/pcn.12540
PMID:28547882
Abstract

AIM

The current cut-off score of the Korean version of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (K-CARS) does not seem to be sensitive enough to precisely diagnose high-functioning autism. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal cut-off score of K-CARS for diagnosing high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

METHODS

A total of 329 participants were assessed by the Korean versions of the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised (K-ADI-R), Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (K-ADOS), and K-CARS. IQ and Social Maturity Scale scores were also obtained.

RESULTS

The true positive and false negative rates of K-CARS were 77.2% and 22.8%, respectively. Verbal IQ (VIQ) and Social Quotient (SQ) were significant predictors of misclassification. The false negative rate increased to 36.0% from 19.8% when VIQ was >69.5, and the rate increased to 44.1% for participants with VIQ > 69.5 and SQ > 75.5. In addition, if SQ was >83.5, the false negative rate increased to 46.7%, even if the participant's VIQ was ≤69.5. Optimal cut-off scores were 28.5 (for VIQ ≤ 69.5 and SQ ≤ 75.5), 24.25 (for VIQ > 69.5 and SQ > 75.5), and 24.5 (for SQ > 83.5), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The likelihood of a false negative error increases when K-CARS is used to diagnose high-functioning autism and Asperger's syndrome. For subjects with ASD and substantial verbal ability, the cut-off score for K-CARS should be re-adjusted and/or supplementary diagnostic tools might be needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy for ASD.

摘要

目的

韩国版儿童自闭症评定量表(K-CARS)的现行截断分数似乎不够敏感,无法精确诊断高功能自闭症。本研究旨在确定 K-CARS 用于诊断高功能自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体的最佳截断分数。

方法

共有 329 名参与者接受了韩国版自闭症诊断访谈修订版(K-ADI-R)、自闭症诊断观察量表(K-ADOS)和 K-CARS 的评估。还获得了智商和社会成熟度量表的分数。

结果

K-CARS 的真阳性和假阴性率分别为 77.2%和 22.8%。言语智商(VIQ)和社会商数(SQ)是分类错误的显著预测因子。当 VIQ>69.5 时,假阴性率从 19.8%增加到 36.0%,而当 VIQ>69.5 和 SQ>75.5 时,假阴性率增加到 44.1%。此外,如果 SQ>83.5,即使参与者的 VIQ≤69.5,假阴性率也会增加到 46.7%。最佳截断分数分别为 28.5(对于 VIQ≤69.5 和 SQ≤75.5)、24.25(对于 VIQ>69.5 和 SQ>75.5)和 24.5(对于 SQ>83.5)。

结论

当使用 K-CARS 诊断高功能自闭症和阿斯伯格综合征时,出现假阴性错误的可能性会增加。对于 ASD 且具有较强言语能力的受试者,应重新调整 K-CARS 的截断分数,或需要补充诊断工具,以提高 ASD 的诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Re-adjusting the cut-off score of the Korean version of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale for high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorder.重新调整自闭症谱系障碍高功能个体的儿童自闭症评定量表韩文版的截断分数。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;71(10):725-732. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12540. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
2
Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children.学龄前儿童自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的诊断测试。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD009044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009044.pub2.
3
Expediting clinician assessment in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.加速临床医生对自闭症谱系障碍的诊断评估。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 Jul;62(7):806-812. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14530. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
4
Application of the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised--Italian version--in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder.修订版重复行为量表(意大利语版)在自闭症谱系障碍学龄前儿童中的应用。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jan;48:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
5
Replication study for ADOS-2 cut-offs to assist evaluation of autism spectrum disorder.ADOS-2 截断值复制研究以辅助孤独症谱系障碍评估。
Autism Res. 2022 Nov;15(11):2181-2191. doi: 10.1002/aur.2801. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
6
Predicting the diagnosis of autism in adults using the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) questionnaire.使用自闭症谱系商数(AQ)问卷预测成人自闭症诊断。
Psychol Med. 2016 Sep;46(12):2595-604. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716001082. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Comparison of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Childhood Autism Rating Scale in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Preliminary Study.《自闭症诊断观察量表与儿童自闭症评定量表在自闭症谱系障碍诊断中的比较:一项初步研究》
Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak. 2018 Oct 1;29(4):172-177. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.180015.
8
Short caregiver interview and play observation for early screening of autism spectrum disorder: Behavior development screening for toddlers (BeDevel).简短照护者访谈和游戏观察用于早期自闭症谱系障碍筛查:婴幼儿行为发育筛查(BeDevel)。
Autism Res. 2021 Jul;14(7):1472-1483. doi: 10.1002/aur.2510. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
Adaptive Behavior Functioning in Children with Autism.自闭症儿童的适应性行为功能
Indian J Pediatr. 2015 Aug;82(8):677-81. doi: 10.1007/s12098-015-1692-8. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
10
Multidimensional Influences on Autism Symptom Measures: Implications for Use in Etiological Research.自闭症症状测量的多维影响:对病因学研究应用的启示
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;55(12):1054-1063.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.490. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A Validation Study of the CARS-2 Compared With the ADOS-2 in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Suggestion for Cutoff Scores.与自闭症诊断观察量表第二版(ADOS-2)相比,儿童孤独症评定量表第二版(CARS-2)在自闭症谱系障碍诊断中的效度研究:关于临界分数的建议。
J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 1;34(1):45-50. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.220027.
2
Comparing the Indian Autism Screening Questionnaire (IASQ) and the Indian Scale for Assessment of Autism (ISAA) with the Childhood Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (CARS2) in Indian settings.在印度环境下,比较印度自闭症筛查问卷(IASQ)和印度自闭症评估量表(ISAA)与儿童自闭症评定量表第二版(CARS2)。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 19;17(9):e0273780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273780. eCollection 2022.
3
Diagnostic validity of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, second edition (K-ADOS-2) in the Korean population.《孤独症诊断观察量表第二版(韩国版,K-ADOS-2)》在韩国人群中的诊断效度。
Mol Autism. 2022 Jun 30;13(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00506-5.
4
Validation of Social Responsiveness Scale for Korean Preschool Children With Autism.韩国自闭症学龄前儿童社会反应量表的验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Sep;18(9):831-840. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0182. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
5
Comparison of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Childhood Autism Rating Scale in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Preliminary Study.《自闭症诊断观察量表与儿童自闭症评定量表在自闭症谱系障碍诊断中的比较:一项初步研究》
Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak. 2018 Oct 1;29(4):172-177. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.180015.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Behavior Development Screening for Toddlers-Questionnaire/Parents(BeDevel-Q/P): A Korean Autism Screening Instrument for Infants aged 24-35 Months.幼儿行为发展筛查问卷/家长版(BeDevel-Q/P)的效度和信度:一种针对24至35个月婴儿的韩国自闭症筛查工具。
Psychiatry Investig. 2020 Jan;17(1):47-54. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.0271. Epub 2020 Jan 25.