Drew Michael K, Lovell Gregory, Palsson Thorvaldur S, Chiarelli Pauline E, Osmotherly Peter G
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; Department of Physical Therapies, Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, Australia.
Department of Sports Medicine, Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, Australia.
Phys Ther Sport. 2017 Jul;26:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
To report normative responses to the HAGOS questionnaire for Australian football players and to determine whether any of the HAGOS questionnaire sub scales can differentiate players with and without groin pain.
Case-control.
Clinical setting.
Professional (n = 66) and semi-professional (n = 9) Australian football (AF) players with current groin pain (n = 16) and controls (n = 57) without current groin pain.
The HAGOS subscales were compared between players with and without groin pain using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with effect sizes (ES) calculated. Floor and ceiling effects were examined. A post-hoc factor analysis was undertaken.
Participants with current groin pain showed lower Physical Function of Daily Living (PFDL) and Physical Function in Sport and Recreation (PFSR) subscale scores (p < 0.05, ES: 0.77 and 0.90 respectively). Any groin pain (current and/or historical) lowered the Pain and Quality of Life (QOL) subscale scores (p < 0.05, ES: 0.38 and 0.72 respectively). Factor analysis showed 8 significant factors with one main factor identified representing items describing forceful activities (Eigenvalue = 18.02, Proportion = 0.49).
The HAGOS can distinguish AF players with current groin pain in the PFDL and PFSR subscales but not in the other four subscales. Any current or historical groin pain lowers scores on the QOL and Pain sub scales.
Aetiology, Individual Case-Control Study, Level 3b.
报告澳大利亚足球运动员对HAGOS问卷的标准反应,并确定HAGOS问卷的任何子量表是否能够区分有腹股沟疼痛和无腹股沟疼痛的运动员。
病例对照研究。
临床环境。
患有当前腹股沟疼痛的职业(n = 66)和半职业(n = 9)澳大利亚足球(AF)运动员(n = 16)以及无当前腹股沟疼痛的对照组(n = 57)。
使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较有和无腹股沟疼痛的运动员之间的HAGOS子量表,并计算效应量(ES)。检查地板效应和天花板效应。进行事后因子分析。
患有当前腹股沟疼痛的参与者在日常生活身体功能(PFDL)和运动及娱乐身体功能(PFSR)子量表上得分较低(p < 0.05,ES分别为0.77和0.90)。任何腹股沟疼痛(当前和/或既往)都会降低疼痛和生活质量(QOL)子量表得分(p < 0.05,ES分别为0.38和0.72)。因子分析显示8个显著因子,其中一个主要因子代表描述强力活动的项目(特征值 = 18.02,比例 = 0.49)。
HAGOS能够在PFDL和PFSR子量表中区分患有当前腹股沟疼痛的AF运动员,但在其他四个子量表中不能区分。任何当前或既往的腹股沟疼痛都会降低QOL和疼痛子量表的得分。
病因学,个体病例对照研究,3b级。