Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, OTB-Research for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Apr;47(4):859-871. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0695-3. Epub 2017 May 29.
Scholars have become increasingly interested in how social environments condition the relationships between individual risk-factors and adolescent behavior. An appreciable portion of this literature is concerned with the relationship between impulsivity and delinquency across neighborhood settings. The present article builds upon this growing body of research by considering the more nuanced pathways through which neighborhood disadvantage shapes the development of impulsivity and provides a situational context for impulsive tendencies to manifest in violent and aggressive behaviors. Using a sample of 12,935 adolescent from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) (mean age = 15.3, 51% female; 20% Black, 17% Hispanic), we demonstrate the extent to which variation in the association between impulsivity and delinquency across neighborhoods can be attributed to (1) differences in mean-levels of impulsivity and violence and (2) differences in coefficients across neighborhoods. The results of a series of multivariate regression models indicate that impulsivity is positively associated with self-reported violence, and that this relationship is strongest among youth living in disadvantaged neighborhoods. The moderating effect of neighborhood disadvantage can be attributed primarily to the stronger effect of impulsivity on violence in these areas, while differences in average levels of violence and impulsivity account for a smaller, yet nontrivial portion of the observed relationship. These results indicate that the differential effect of impulsivity on violence can be attributed to both developmental processes that lead to the greater concentration of violent and impulsive adolescents in economically deprived neighborhoods as well as the greater likelihood of impulsive adolescents engaging in violence when they reside in economically disadvantaged communities.
学者们越来越关注社会环境如何调节个体风险因素与青少年行为之间的关系。这方面的文献相当一部分关注冲动性与邻里环境下的犯罪行为之间的关系。本文在这一不断发展的研究领域的基础上,通过考虑邻里劣势影响冲动性发展的更为微妙的途径,并为冲动倾向在暴力和攻击行为中的表现提供情境背景,进一步探讨了这一问题。利用来自全国青少年纵向研究成人健康(Add Health)的 12935 名青少年样本(平均年龄为 15.3 岁,女性占 51%;20%为黑人,17%为西班牙裔),我们展示了邻里之间冲动性与犯罪行为之间的关联差异在多大程度上可以归因于(1)冲动性和暴力的平均水平差异,以及(2)邻里之间的系数差异。一系列多元回归模型的结果表明,冲动性与自我报告的暴力行为呈正相关,而这种关系在生活在劣势邻里的青少年中最为强烈。邻里劣势的调节作用主要归因于冲动性对这些地区暴力行为的影响更强,而暴力和冲动性的平均水平差异仅占观察到的关系的一小部分,但并非微不足道。这些结果表明,冲动性对暴力的不同影响可以归因于导致具有暴力和冲动性的青少年在经济贫困社区更为集中的发展过程,以及当他们居住在经济劣势社区时,冲动性青少年更有可能从事暴力行为。