Arizona State University.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
J Couns Psychol. 2014 Apr;61(2):221-31. doi: 10.1037/a0035207. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Community violence exposure results in heightened risk for engaging in and being a victim of interpersonal violence. Despite this robust literature, few studies have specifically examined how the relation between community violence exposure, peer aggression, and victimization is modified by individual, peer, and familial influences (considered jointly). In the current study, we used risk and resiliency theory to examine links between community violence exposure and peer aggression and victimization. Impulsivity and parental monitoring were examined as potential moderators of the link between community violence exposure and outcomes, both directly and indirectly via deviant behavior. Survey data on bullying involvement, fighting, deviancy, parental monitoring, and impulsivity were collected on 3 occasions over an 18-month period among a large cohort of adolescents (N = 1,232) in 5th-7th grades. Structural equation modeling suggests that for both male and female adolescents, impulsivity exacerbates the effects of community violence exposure by increasing involvement in deviant behavior. Parental monitoring buffered the effects of community violence exposure on perpetration and victimization (for males and female adolescents) via reduced involvement in deviant behavior. Findings suggest that impulsivity and parental monitoring are implicated in modifying the effects of community violence exposure on both victimization and perpetration through deviancy, although deviancy is not as potent of a predictor for victimization. Thus, prevention efforts would seem to be optimally targeted at multiple ecological levels, including parental involvement and peer networks.
社区暴力暴露会增加人际暴力的参与和受害风险。尽管有大量相关文献,但很少有研究专门探讨社区暴力暴露、同伴攻击和受害之间的关系是如何受到个体、同伴和家庭影响(综合考虑)的改变。在当前的研究中,我们使用风险和恢复力理论来检验社区暴力暴露与同伴攻击和受害之间的联系。冲动性和父母监督被视为社区暴力暴露与结果之间联系的潜在调节因素,既可以直接通过偏差行为,也可以间接通过偏差行为进行调节。在 5 至 7 年级的一个大型青少年队列中,在 18 个月的时间内进行了 3 次欺凌参与、打架、偏差行为、父母监督和冲动性的调查,收集了关于欺凌参与、打架、偏差行为、父母监督和冲动性的调查数据。结构方程模型表明,对于男性和女性青少年,冲动性通过增加偏差行为的参与度,加剧了社区暴力暴露的影响。父母监督通过减少偏差行为的参与,缓冲了社区暴力暴露对犯罪和受害的影响(对于男性和女性青少年)。研究结果表明,冲动性和父母监督通过偏差行为参与调节社区暴力暴露对受害和犯罪的影响,尽管偏差行为不是受害的一个强有力预测因素。因此,预防工作似乎最好针对多个生态层次,包括父母参与和同伴网络。