Hagovská Magdaléna, Dzvoník Oliver, Olekszyová Zuzana
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Jul 1;10(4):172-180. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20170524-01. Epub 2017 May 30.
The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of two types of cognitive training in 60 older adults with mild cognitive impairment by assessing the impact on functional activities, quality of life (QOL), and various cognitive functions. The primary outcomes were functional activity level and QOL. The secondary outcome was cognitive examination. Group assignment was random. Group A (n = 30) underwent CogniPlus, a computer-based, cognitive training. Group B (n = 30) underwent classical group-based cognitive training. Both programs comprised two 30-minute sessions per week for 10 weeks. After training, group A had better QOL (p < 0.001, effect size [ES] = 0.69) and better attention (increased load score, p < 0.05, ES = -0.23; errors, p < 0.001, ES = -0.47); however, there were no group differences in functional activity level. Group A demonstrated larger improvements in QOL and attention than group B (i.e., classical cognitive training), but the transfer to functional activities was the same between groups. [Res Gerontol Nurs. 2017; 10(4):172-180.].
本研究的目的是通过评估对功能活动、生活质量（QOL）和各种认知功能的影响，比较两种认知训练对60名轻度认知障碍老年人的有效性。主要结果是功能活动水平和生活质量。次要结果是认知检查。分组是随机的。A组（n = 30）接受基于计算机的认知训练CogniPlus。B组（n = 30）接受传统的基于小组的认知训练。两个项目均包括每周两次，每次30分钟，共10周。训练后，A组的生活质量更好（p < 0.001，效应量[ES] = 0.69），注意力也更好（负荷分数增加，p < 0.05，ES = -0.23；错误，p < 0.001，ES = -0.47）；然而，两组在功能活动水平上没有差异。A组在生活质量和注意力方面的改善比B组（即传统认知训练）更大，但两组在功能活动转移方面相同。[《老年护理研究》。2017年；10（4）：172 - 180。]
