• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生的表现可预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的早期控尿情况。

Surgeon Performance Predicts Early Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

作者信息

Goldenberg Mitchell G, Goldenberg Larry, Grantcharov Teodor P

机构信息

1 Division of Urology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada .

2 Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada .

出版信息

J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):858-863. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0284. Epub 2017 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0284
PMID:28557582
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is limited, yet compelling evidence supporting the role of surgeon technical performance in influencing patient outcomes. To date, this concept has been underexplored in endourologic procedures. We hypothesized that a surgeon's technical performance plays a role in predicting an early return to continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, matched case-control analysis of prospectively collected unedited RARP endoscopic videos performed by a single surgeon. A blinded observer with expertise in intraoperative video analysis evaluated clinically relevant steps of RARP using the global evaluative assessment of robotic skill (GEARS) and the generic error rating tool (GERT). The primary outcome was continence status at 3 months postoperatively, defined as patient use of less than or equal to a single precautionary pad. Mann-Whitney U tests examined differences in predictor variables between cases and controls, and multivariate analysis was conducted using binary logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Twenty-four incontinent patients were matched for age, body mass index, preoperative International Prostate Symptoms Score, use of posterior/anterior hitch, prostate weight, and learning curve position. No statistically significant difference in errors between groups was observed using the GERT. On multivariate analysis, overall case GEARS score was independently predictive of 3-month continence status (odds ratios [OR] = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.91), as were urethrovesical anastomosis (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.97) and bladder neck GEARS scores (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study generates the hypothesis that there may be a link between surgeon technical performance and functional outcomes in RARP. This relationship may have implications for the accreditation and training of future urologists and warrants further investigation.

摘要

引言

支持外科医生技术操作在影响患者预后方面作用的证据有限,但令人信服。迄今为止,这一概念在内腔泌尿外科手术中尚未得到充分探索。我们假设外科医生的技术操作在预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后早期恢复控尿方面发挥作用。

材料与方法

我们对由一名外科医生前瞻性收集的未经编辑的RARP内镜视频进行了回顾性、匹配病例对照分析。一名具有术中视频分析专业知识的盲法观察者使用机器人技能全球评估(GEARS)和通用错误评分工具(GERT)评估RARP的临床相关步骤。主要结局是术后3个月的控尿状态,定义为患者使用不超过一片预防性尿垫。曼-惠特尼U检验检查病例组和对照组之间预测变量的差异,并使用二元逻辑回归模型进行多变量分析。

结果

24名尿失禁患者在年龄、体重指数、术前国际前列腺症状评分、使用后/前悬吊术、前列腺重量和学习曲线位置方面进行了匹配。使用GERT未观察到两组之间在错误方面有统计学显著差异。多变量分析显示,总体病例GEARS评分独立预测3个月控尿状态(优势比[OR]=0.55,95%置信区间[CI]0.33 - 0.91),尿道膀胱吻合术(OR=0.70,95%CI 0.50 - 0.97)和膀胱颈GEARS评分(OR=0.69,95%CI 0.51 - 0.94)也具有预测作用。

结论

我们的研究提出了一个假设,即外科医生技术操作与RARP的功能结局之间可能存在联系。这种关系可能对未来泌尿外科医生的认证和培训有影响,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Surgeon Performance Predicts Early Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.外科医生的表现可预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的早期控尿情况。
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):858-863. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0284. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
2
Assessing the Impact of Surgeon Experience on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of Four High-Volume Surgeons.评估外科医生经验对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复的影响:四位高手术量外科医生的研究结果。
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):872-877. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0085. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
3
Intravesical prostatic protrusion may affect early postoperative continence undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.膀胱内前列腺突出可能会影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期的控尿功能。
BMC Urol. 2020 Oct 21;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00740-0.
4
The Impact of Lateral Bladder Neck Preservation on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.保留膀胱颈外侧对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复的影响
J Endourol. 2018 Jan;32(1):40-45. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0459. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
5
Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中医师经验和骨盆骨尺寸对手术表现和患者结局的影响。
BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124(5):828-835. doi: 10.1111/bju.14857. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
Combined bladder neck preservation and posterior musculofascial reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: effects on early and long term urinary continence recovery.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中联合膀胱颈保留和后肌筋膜重建:对早期和长期尿控恢复的影响。
BMC Urol. 2017 Dec 15;17(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0308-1.
7
Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.利用包括尿动力学评估和神经保留状态在内的术前因素预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复情况:神经保留技术有助于减少前列腺切除术后尿失禁。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Nov;35(8):1034-1039. doi: 10.1002/nau.22877. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
8
Quantifying the "Assistant Effect" in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP): Measures of Technical Performance.量化机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)中的“助手效应”:技术表现的度量。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.037. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
9
Urinary continence outcomes of four years of follow-up and predictors of early and late urinary continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者四年随访的尿控结局及早期和晚期尿控的预测因素。
BMC Urol. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00601-w.
10
Retzius Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Conveys Early Regain of Continence over Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 1,863 Patients.保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助前列腺根治术较传统机器人辅助前列腺根治术在早期恢复控尿方面具有优势:1863 例患者倾向性评分匹配分析。
J Urol. 2020 Jan;203(1):137-144. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000461. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Untangling surgical gesture analysis-are we even speaking the same language? a systematic review.解析手术手势分析——我们说的是同一种语言吗?一项系统综述。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep;39(9):5538-5557. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11907-x. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Automatic recognition of surgical phase of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on artificial intelligence deep-learning model and its application in surgical skill evaluation: a joint study of 18 medical education centers.基于人工智能深度学习模型的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术手术阶段自动识别及其在手术技能评估中的应用:18个医学教育中心的联合研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11967-z.
3
Multi-perspective analysis of daVinci surgical virtual reality training: a prospective randomized controlled study.
达芬奇手术虚拟现实训练的多视角分析:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 16;19(1):221. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02309-1.
4
Artificial intelligence in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: where do we stand today?机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的人工智能:我们今天处于什么位置?
J Robot Surg. 2024 Nov 11;18(1):404. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02143-x.
5
Objective performance indicators differ in obese and nonobese patients during robotic proctectomy.肥胖和非肥胖患者在机器人直肠切除术期间的客观表现指标存在差异。
Surgery. 2024 Dec;176(6):1591-1597. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.015. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
A novel pelvis-prostate model BPPP predicts immediate urinary continence after Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.一种新型的骨盆-前列腺模型 BPPP 可预测保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术后即刻尿控。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):19271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70080-8.
7
Initial surgical performance in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with clinical outcomes and learning curves.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的初始手术表现与临床结果和学习曲线相关。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5634-5642. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11127-9. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
8
Automated performance metrics and surgical gestures: two methods for assessment of technical skills in robotic surgery.自动化绩效指标和手术动作:机器人手术技术评估的两种方法。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 27;18(1):297. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02051-0.
9
Nationwide Association of Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy With Patient Outcomes.全国范围内微创食管切除术手术表现与患者结局的关联协会。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e246556. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6556.
10
European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024).欧洲结直肠外科学会机器人结直肠手术培训指南(2024年)
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):776-801. doi: 10.1111/codi.16904. Epub 2024 Mar 1.