Clincial Psychopharmacology Unit,University College London,Gower St, London,UK.
The Sophie Davis School of Biomedical Education, The City College of New York,NY,USA.
Psychol Med. 2017 Nov;47(15):2708-2719. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717001222. Epub 2017 May 31.
Cannabis and tobacco have contrasting cognitive effects. Smoking cannabis with tobacco is prevalent in many countries and although this may well influence cognitive and mental health outcomes, the possibility has rarely been investigated in human experimental psychopharmacological research.
The individual and interactive effects of cannabis and tobacco were evaluated in 24 non-dependent cannabis and tobacco smokers in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2 (cannabis, placebo) × 2 (tobacco, placebo) crossover design. Verbal memory (prose recall), working memory (WM) performance including maintenance, manipulation and attention (N-back), psychotomimetic, subjective and cardiovascular measures were recorded on each of four sessions.
Cannabis alone impaired verbal memory. A priori contrasts indicated that tobacco offset the effects of cannabis on delayed recall. However, this was not supported by linear mixed model analysis. Cannabis load-dependently impaired WM. By contrast, tobacco improved WM across all load levels. The acute psychotomimetic effects and ratings of 'stoned' and 'dizzy' induced by cannabis were not altered by tobacco. Cannabis and tobacco had independent effects on increasing heart rate and interacting effects on increasing diastolic blood pressure.
Relative to placebo, acute cannabis impaired verbal memory and WM. Tobacco enhanced performance on WM, independently of cannabis. Moreover, we found some preliminary evidence that tobacco may offset the effects of cannabis on delayed, but not immediate, verbal recall. In contrast, the psychotomimetic and subjective effects of cannabis were unaffected by tobacco co-administration. By reducing the cognitive impairment from cannabis, tobacco co-administration may perpetuate use despite adverse health consequences.
大麻和烟草具有相反的认知效应。在许多国家,大麻与烟草混合吸食非常普遍,尽管这很可能会影响认知和心理健康结果,但在人类实验精神药理学研究中很少有对此进行调查。
在一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、2(大麻,安慰剂)×2(烟草,安慰剂)交叉设计中,评估了 24 名非依赖性大麻和烟草吸烟者中大麻和烟草的单独和交互作用。在每个四个疗程中记录了言语记忆(散文回忆)、工作记忆(WM)表现,包括维持、操作和注意力(N-回)、精神模拟、主观和心血管措施。
单独使用大麻会损害言语记忆。预先设定的对比表明,烟草抵消了大麻对延迟回忆的影响。然而,线性混合模型分析并不支持这一点。大麻的负荷依赖性地损害了 WM。相比之下,烟草改善了所有负荷水平的 WM。大麻引起的急性精神模拟效应和“昏昏欲睡”和“头晕”的评分不受烟草影响。大麻和烟草对心率的增加有独立的影响,对舒张压的增加有相互作用。
与安慰剂相比,急性大麻会损害言语记忆和 WM。烟草独立于大麻改善 WM 表现。此外,我们发现一些初步证据表明,烟草可能会抵消大麻对延迟但不是即时言语回忆的影响。相比之下,烟草共给药不会影响大麻的精神模拟和主观效应。通过减少大麻引起的认知障碍,烟草共给药可能会延续使用,尽管会带来不良的健康后果。