Suppr超能文献

每周使用大麻者的大麻使用障碍症状:每日吸烟者与非每日吸烟者之间的网络比较。

Cannabis Use Disorder Symptoms in Weekly Cannabis Users: A Network Comparison Between Daily Cigarette Users and Nondaily Cigarette Users.

机构信息

ADAPT-Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Neuroscience of Addiction (NofA) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2024 Jun;9(3):e847-e858. doi: 10.1089/can.2022.0239. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

Abstract

Concurrent use (co-use) of cannabis and tobacco is common and associated with worse clinical outcomes compared with cannabis use only. The mechanisms and interactions of cannabis use disorder (CUD) symptoms underlying co-use remain poorly understood. We examined differences in the symptom presence and symptom network configurations between weekly cannabis users who use tobacco daily (co-users, =789) or non- or nondaily (nondaily co-users, =428). First, we identified a range of symptoms (, failed , neglected , and negative effects) that are most central to the highly interconnected CUD symptom network. Risky cannabis use was mostly associated with negative social and health effects, and independent of other CUD symptoms. Craving symptoms act as a bridge between different CUD and withdrawal symptoms. Among co-users, (1) craving is more strongly associated with negative psychosocial effects, (2) feelings of depression and negative health effects are more central to the network, and (3) the negative health effects are more strongly associated with failed attempts to reduce or quit attempts compared with nondaily co-users. Our results go beyond existing findings focused on the mere increase in CUD symptom presence, and speak to the potential synergistic effects of co-use on dependence and withdrawal symptoms. We outline clinical implications with respect to targeting specific CUD symptoms in co-users, and point to future research to disentangle tobacco and cannabis craving symptoms.

摘要

同时使用(共用)大麻和烟草很常见,与仅使用大麻相比,与更差的临床结果相关。共用背后的大麻使用障碍(CUD)症状的机制和相互作用仍知之甚少。我们研究了每周使用大麻且每天使用烟草的使用者(共使用者,=789)或非或非每日使用者(非每日共使用者,=428)之间症状存在和症状网络结构的差异。首先,我们确定了一系列症状(失败,疏忽和负面作用),这些症状对高度相互关联的 CUD 症状网络最为重要。冒险使用大麻主要与负面的社会和健康影响有关,并且与其他 CUD 症状无关。渴望症状是不同 CUD 和戒断症状之间的桥梁。在共使用者中,(1)渴望与负面的心理社会影响更密切相关,(2)抑郁和负面健康影响在网络中更重要,(3)与非每日共使用者相比,负面健康影响与减少或尝试戒烟的失败尝试更密切相关。我们的研究结果超越了仅关注 CUD 症状增加的现有发现,说明了共用对依赖和戒断症状的潜在协同作用。我们概述了针对共使用者特定 CUD 症状的临床意义,并指出了未来研究的方向,以区分烟草和大麻的渴望症状。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Gender differences in cannabis use disorder symptoms: A network analysis.大麻使用障碍症状的性别差异:一项网络分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Feb 1;243:109733. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109733. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
2
Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.比较网络结构的三个方面:置换检验。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Dec;28(6):1273-1285. doi: 10.1037/met0000476. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Symptom networks in patients with substance use disorders.物质使用障碍患者的症状网络。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Dec 1;229(Pt B):109080. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109080. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Network Analysis of Psychopathology: Controversies and Challenges.网络分析在精神病理学中的应用:争议与挑战。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021 May 7;17:31-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-092850. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
7
Moderated Network Models.调节网络模型。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Mar-Apr;56(2):256-287. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1677207. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
9
Tobacco and cannabis co-use and interrelatedness among adults.成人中烟草和大麻的共同使用及相互关系。
Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.036. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验