Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Addiction. 2023 Jul;118(7):1282-1294. doi: 10.1111/add.16154. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
Long-term harms of cannabis may be exacerbated in adolescence, but little is known about the acute effects of cannabis in adolescents. We aimed to (i) compare the acute effects of cannabis in adolescent and adult cannabis users and (ii) determine if cannabidiol (CBD) acutely modulates the effects of delta-9-tetrahydocannabinol (THC).
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover experiment. The experiment was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04851392).
Laboratory in London, United Kingdom.
Twenty-four adolescents (12 women, 16- to 17-year-olds) and 24 adults (12 women, 26- to 29-year-olds) who used cannabis 0.5-3 days/week and were matched on cannabis use frequency (mean = 1.5 days/week).
We administered three weight-adjusted vaporised cannabis flower preparations: 'THC' (8 mg THC for 75 kg person); 'THC + CBD' (8 mg THC and 24 mg CBD for 75 kg person); and 'PLA' (matched placebo).
Primary outcomes were (i) subjective 'feel drug effect'; (ii) verbal episodic memory (delayed prose recall); and (iii) psychotomimetic effect (Psychotomimetic States Inventory).
Compared with 'PLA', 'THC' and 'THC + CBD' significantly (P < 0.001) increased 'feel drug effect' (mean difference [MD] = 6.3, 95% CI = 5.3-7.2; MD = 6.8, 95% CI = 6.0-7.7), impaired verbal episodic memory (MD = -2.7, 95% CI = -4.1 to -1.4; MD = -2.9, 95% CI = -4.1 to -1.7) and increased psychotomimetic effects (MD = 7.8, 95% CI = 2.8-12.7; MD = 10.8, 95% CI = 6.2-15.4). There was no evidence that adolescents differed from adults in their responses to cannabis (interaction P ≥ 0.4). Bayesian analyses supported equivalent effects of cannabis in adolescents and adults (Bayes factor [BF ] >3). There was no evidence that CBD significantly modulated the acute effects of THC.
Adolescent cannabis users are neither more resilient nor more vulnerable than adult cannabis users to the acute psychotomimetic, verbal memory-impairing or subjective effects of cannabis. Furthermore, in adolescents and adults, vaporised cannabidiol does not mitigate the acute harms caused by delta-9-tetrahydocannabinol.
大麻的长期危害可能在青春期加剧,但人们对青少年吸食大麻的急性影响知之甚少。我们旨在:(i)比较青少年和成年大麻使用者吸食大麻的急性影响;(ii)确定大麻二酚(CBD)是否能急性调节 delta-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)的作用。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉实验。该实验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(NCT04851392)。
英国伦敦的实验室。
24 名青少年(12 名女性,16-17 岁)和 24 名成年人(12 名女性,26-29 岁),他们每周使用大麻 0.5-3 天,且大麻使用频率相匹配(平均每天 1.5 天)。
我们给予三种重量调整后的大麻花制剂:“THC”(75 公斤体重者 8 毫克 THC);“THC+CBD”(75 公斤体重者 8 毫克 THC 和 24 毫克 CBD);和“PLA”(匹配的安慰剂)。
主要结果是:(i)主观的“感觉药物效应”;(ii)口头情节记忆(延迟散文回忆);和(iii)精神模拟效应(精神模拟状态量表)。
与“PLA”相比,“THC”和“THC+CBD”显著(P<0.001)增加了“感觉药物效应”(平均差异[MD] = 6.3,95%置信区间[CI] = 5.3-7.2;MD = 6.8,95%CI = 6.0-7.7),损害了口头情节记忆(MD = -2.7,95%CI = -4.1 至 -1.4;MD = -2.9,95%CI = -4.1 至 -1.7),并增加了精神模拟效应(MD = 7.8,95%CI = 2.8-12.7;MD = 10.8,95%CI = 6.2-15.4)。没有证据表明青少年对大麻的反应与成年人不同(交互 P≥0.4)。贝叶斯分析支持青少年和成年人吸食大麻的效果相当(贝叶斯因子[BF]>3)。没有证据表明 CBD 能显著调节 THC 的急性作用。
青少年大麻使用者在对大麻的急性精神模拟、口头记忆损害或主观影响方面,既没有更强的抵抗力,也没有更脆弱。此外,在青少年和成年人中,大麻二酚的蒸气吸入并不能减轻 delta-9-四氢大麻酚造成的急性危害。