Suppr超能文献

评估中风后成年人的认知能力和基于模拟器的驾驶表现。

Assessing Cognitive Ability and Simulator-Based Driving Performance in Poststroke Adults.

作者信息

Blane Alison, Lee Hoe C, Falkmer Torbjörn, Willstrand Tania Dukic

机构信息

School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Behav Neurol. 2017;2017:1378308. doi: 10.1155/2017/1378308. Epub 2017 May 7.

Abstract

Driving is an important activity of daily living, which is increasingly relied upon as the population ages. It has been well-established that cognitive processes decline following a stroke and these processes may influence driving performance. There is much debate on the use of off-road neurological assessments and driving simulators as tools to predict driving performance; however, the majority of research uses unlicensed poststroke drivers, making the comparability of poststroke adults to that of a control group difficult. It stands to reason that in order to determine whether simulators and cognitive assessments can accurately assess driving performance, the baseline should be set by licenced drivers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess differences in cognitive ability and driving simulator performance in licensed community-dwelling poststroke drivers and controls. Two groups of licensed drivers (37 poststroke and 43 controls) were assessed using several cognitive tasks and using a driving simulator. The poststroke adults exhibited poorer cognitive ability; however, there were no differences in simulator performance between groups except that the poststroke drivers demonstrated less variability in driver headway. The application of these results as a prescreening toolbox for poststroke drivers is discussed.

摘要

驾驶是日常生活中的一项重要活动,随着人口老龄化,人们对驾驶的依赖程度越来越高。众所周知,中风后认知功能会下降,而这些功能可能会影响驾驶表现。关于使用越野神经学评估和驾驶模拟器作为预测驾驶表现的工具存在很多争议;然而,大多数研究使用的是无驾照的中风后驾驶者,这使得中风后成年人与对照组之间的可比性较差。理所当然的是,为了确定模拟器和认知评估是否能够准确评估驾驶表现,基线应由有驾照的驾驶者设定。因此,本研究的目的是评估有驾照的社区居住中风后驾驶者和对照组在认知能力和驾驶模拟器表现方面的差异。两组有驾照的驾驶者(37名中风后驾驶者和43名对照组)通过几项认知任务和驾驶模拟器进行了评估。中风后成年人的认知能力较差;然而,两组之间在模拟器表现上没有差异,只是中风后驾驶者在车头时距方面的变异性较小。本文讨论了将这些结果应用于中风后驾驶者预筛查工具箱的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b812/5438860/76e2eb14a204/BN2017-1378308.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验