Moving the Debate Forward in Right to Health Litigation.
作者信息
Ferraz Octavio Luiz Motta
机构信息
Reader in Transnational Law, King's College, London.
出版信息
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):265-268.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Moving the Debate Forward in Right to Health Litigation.推动健康权诉讼辩论向前发展。
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):265-268.
2
Introduction: Pharmaceutical firms and the right to health.引言：制药公司与健康权。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Summer;40(2):183-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00656.x.
3
Right-to-Medicines Litigation and Universal Health Coverage: Institutional Determinants of the Judicialization of Health in Brazil.药品权利诉讼与全民健康覆盖：巴西卫生司法化的制度决定因素。
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):221-235.
4
On the Heterogeneity and Politics of the Judicialization of Health in Brazil.论巴西卫生司法化的异质性与政治
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):269-271.
5
The debatable role of courts in Brazil's health care system: does litigation harm or help?巴西医疗体系中法院的争议角色：诉讼是有害还是有益？
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Spring;41(1):124-37. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12009.
6
The right to health and accountability.健康权与问责制。
Lancet. 2008 Sep 27;372(9644):1150. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61480-4.
7
Does the pharmaceutical sector have a coresponsibility for the human right to health?制药行业对健康权是否负有共同责任？
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Apr;20(2):298-308. doi: 10.1017/S0963180110000952.
8
Autonomy and rights: dignity and right.自主性与权利：尊严与权利。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1995 Spring;11(2):473-8.
9
Litigation as TB Rights Advocacy: A New Delhi Case Study.作为结核病权利倡导手段的诉讼：新德里案例研究
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jun;18(1):69-84.
10
Global Health Justice and the Right to Health.全球卫生正义与健康权。
Health Care Anal. 2015 Dec;23(4):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0297-8.
引用本文的文献
1
The Right to Health as a Tool of Social Control: Compulsory Treatment Orders by Courts in Brazil.健康权作为社会控制工具：巴西法院的强制治疗令。
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Jun;24(1):159-169.
2
Advancing a Human Rights-Based Approach to Access to Medicines: Lessons Learned from the Constitutional Court of Peru.推进以人权为基础的药品获取方法：秘鲁宪法法院的经验教训。
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Jun;24(1):49-58.
3
[Judicial recourse and access to health technologies: opportunities and risksJudicialização e acesso a tecnologias em saúde: oportunidades e riscos].[司法求助与获得卫生技术：机遇与风险 司法介入与获得卫生技术：机遇与风险]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Dec 5;41:e137. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.137. eCollection 2017.
4
On the Heterogeneity and Politics of the Judicialization of Health in Brazil.论巴西卫生司法化的异质性与政治
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):269-271.
本文引用的文献
1
Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage: a précis.在实现全民健康覆盖的道路上做出公平选择：概述
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Jan;11(1):71-7. doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000541. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
2
Judicialisation of the right to health in Brazil.巴西健康权的司法化
Lancet. 2009 Jun 27;373(9682):2182-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61172-7.
Zotero 插件