• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品权利诉讼与全民健康覆盖:巴西卫生司法化的制度决定因素。

Right-to-Medicines Litigation and Universal Health Coverage: Institutional Determinants of the Judicialization of Health in Brazil.

机构信息

Assistant Scientist at the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.

Director of Global Health and Clinical Professor at the Office of Global Health, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):221-235.

PMID:32669803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7348422/
Abstract

Over the past three decades, Brazil has developed a decentralized universal health system and achieved significant advances in key health indicators. At the same time, Brazil's health system has struggled to ensure equitable and quality health services. One response to the broad promises and notable shortcomings has been a sharp rise in right-to-health litigation, most often seeking access to medicines. While much has been written about the characteristics of patient-plaintiffs and the requested medicines in right-to-health litigation in Brazil, little research has examined potential community-level and institutional drivers of judicialization and their role as mechanisms of accountability. To explore these dimensions, we used a mixed-effects analytical model to examine a representative sample of lawsuits for access to medicines filed against the state of Rio Grande do Sul in 2008. We found that the presence of a Public Defender's Office was associated with a sevenfold increase in the likelihood of a municipality having a medicine-requesting lawsuit. This effect was maintained after controlling for a series of municipality characteristics. As low- and middle-income countries seek to achieve universal health coverage within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals, Brazil's experience may be illustrative of the challenges that health systems will face and the institutional mechanisms that will emerge, advancing accountability and individual patients' interests in response.

摘要

在过去的三十年中,巴西已经建立了一个去中心化的全民健康体系,并在关键的健康指标上取得了重大进展。与此同时,巴西的卫生系统一直在努力确保公平和高质量的卫生服务。为了应对广泛的承诺和明显的不足,人们对健康权诉讼的反应非常强烈,而健康权诉讼大多是为了获得药品。尽管人们已经写了很多关于巴西健康权诉讼中的患者原告和所要求药品的特征的文章,但很少有研究探讨司法化的潜在社区层面和机构驱动因素及其作为问责机制的作用。为了探索这些方面,我们使用混合效应分析模型,对 2008 年针对巴西南里奥格兰德州提出的药品获取诉讼的代表性样本进行了分析。我们发现,公共辩护人办公室的存在与一个市镇提起药品请求诉讼的可能性增加了七倍有关。在控制了一系列市镇特征后,这种影响仍然存在。随着中低收入国家在可持续发展目标的框架内寻求实现全民健康覆盖,巴西的经验可能说明了卫生系统将面临的挑战,以及将出现的机构机制,以响应提高问责制和个人患者的利益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c0e/7348422/c236c3613d25/hhr-22-01-221-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c0e/7348422/d9b337720872/hhr-22-01-221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c0e/7348422/700db5d0e849/hhr-22-01-221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c0e/7348422/c236c3613d25/hhr-22-01-221-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c0e/7348422/d9b337720872/hhr-22-01-221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c0e/7348422/700db5d0e849/hhr-22-01-221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c0e/7348422/c236c3613d25/hhr-22-01-221-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Right-to-Medicines Litigation and Universal Health Coverage: Institutional Determinants of the Judicialization of Health in Brazil.药品权利诉讼与全民健康覆盖:巴西卫生司法化的制度决定因素。
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):221-235.
2
Between the court and the clinic: lawsuits for medicines and the right to health in Brazil.法庭与诊所之间:巴西的药品诉讼与健康权
Health Hum Rights. 2012 Jun 15;14(1):E36-52.
3
The Judicialization of Health and the Quest for State Accountability: Evidence from 1,262 Lawsuits for Access to Medicines in Southern Brazil.健康的司法化与对国家问责制的追求:来自巴西南部1262起获取药品诉讼的证据
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jun;18(1):209-220.
4
Institutional strategies as a mechanism to rationalize the negative effects of the judicialization of access to medicine in Brazil.机构策略作为一种机制,以合理化巴西获得药物司法化的负面影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4929-9.
5
Judicialization of access to medicines in four Latin American countries: a comparative qualitative analysis.四个拉丁美洲国家获取药品的司法化:比较定性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0960-z.
6
Judicialization 2.0: Understanding right-to-health litigation in real time.司法化 2.0:实时理解健康权诉讼。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Feb;14(2):190-199. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1474483. Epub 2018 May 21.
7
Legal access to medications: a threat to Brazil's public health system?药品的合法获取:对巴西公共卫生系统的威胁?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 19;17(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2430-x.
8
Profile of judicialization in access to antineoplastic drugs and their costs: a cross-sectional, descriptive study based on a set of all lawsuits filed between 2016 and 2018 in a state in the Northeast Region of Brazil.获取抗肿瘤药物及其费用的司法化概况:基于巴西东北部一个州在 2016 年至 2018 年间提起的所有诉讼案件的一个横断面、描述性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 26;22(1):1824. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14199-1.
9
Administrative cases: an effective alternative to lawsuits in assuring access to medicines?行政案件:确保药品可及性的替代诉讼的有效途径?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 20;19(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6529-3.
10
Judicialization of health: profile of demands for oncological medicines in a state in the central region of Brazil.卫生领域的司法化:巴西中部分区对肿瘤药物需求的状况。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Aug 17;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01704-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment-specific interrupted time series analyses of judicial deference to health technology assessment in Brazil.巴西司法对卫生技术评估的特定治疗中断时间序列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 12;25(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13088-8.
2
Realizing the Right to Health: A Long and Winding Road.实现健康权:一条漫长而曲折的道路。
Health Hum Rights. 2023 Dec;25(2):1-14.
3
Covid-19 Outbreak in Brazil: Health, Social, Political, and Economic Implications.巴西的新冠疫情爆发:健康、社会、政治和经济影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Brazil's unified health system: the first 30 years and prospects for the future.巴西的统一卫生系统:过去 30 年的发展及未来展望。
Lancet. 2019 Jul 27;394(10195):345-356. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31243-7. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
2
Unique challenges for health equity in Latin America: situating the roles of priority-setting and judicial enforcement.拉丁美洲健康公平面临的独特挑战:确定优先排序和司法执行的作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 4;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1005-3.
3
(Un)Equitable distribution of health resources and the judicialization of healthcare: 10 years of experience in Brazil.
Int J Health Serv. 2022 Oct;52(4):442-454. doi: 10.1177/00207314221122658. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
4
Supreme Court v. Necropolitics: The Chaotic Judicialization of COVID-19 in Brazil.最高法院诉“疫权政治”:巴西新冠肺炎疫情的混乱司法化
Health Hum Rights. 2021 Jun;23(1):151-162.
(非)公平的卫生资源分配与医疗保健的司法化:巴西的 10 年经验。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0914-5.
4
Individual Health Care Litigation in Brazil through a Different Lens: Strengthening Health Technology Assessment and New Models of Health Care Governance.透过不同视角看巴西的个人医疗保健诉讼:加强卫生技术评估与新型医疗保健治理模式
Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jun;20(1):147-162.
5
[Decentralization of health management:the path traveled to date, problematic points and prospects].[卫生管理的分权:迄今为止走过的道路、问题点及前景]
Cien Saude Colet. 2016 May;21(5):1511-24. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232015215.18942015.
6
Brazil's health system woes worsen in economic crisis.巴西卫生系统困境在经济危机中加剧。
Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1603-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30249-5. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
7
[The thesis of judicialization of health care by the elites: medication for mucopolysaccharidosis].[精英阶层推动医疗保健司法化的论点:黏多糖贮积症的药物治疗]
Cien Saude Colet. 2013 Apr;18(4):1079-88. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232013000400022.
8
The debatable role of courts in Brazil's health care system: does litigation harm or help?巴西医疗体系中法院的争议角色:诉讼是有害还是有益?
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Spring;41(1):124-37. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12009.
9
Between the court and the clinic: lawsuits for medicines and the right to health in Brazil.法庭与诊所之间:巴西的药品诉讼与健康权
Health Hum Rights. 2012 Jun 15;14(1):E36-52.
10
[Situation of lawsuits concerning the access to medical products by the Health Department of Santa Catarina State, Brazil, during the years 2003 and 2004].[2003年至2004年期间巴西圣卡塔琳娜州卫生部关于获取医疗产品的诉讼情况]
Cien Saude Colet. 2010 Nov;15 Suppl 3:3551-60. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232010000900030.