• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢他啶与阿米卡星联合替卡西林治疗严重感染的对比研究

Ceftazidime versus a combination of amikacin and ticarcillin in the treatment of severe infections.

作者信息

Limson B M, Navarro-Almario E, Litam P, Que E, Kua L T

机构信息

Philippine Heart Center for Asia, University of the Philippines, Quezon City.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1988;10(5):589-93.

PMID:2856601
Abstract

Hospital patients with severe gram-negative bacterial infections were randomly assigned to treatment with ceftazidime (2 gm every eight or 12 hours) or a combination of amikacin (500 mg every 12 hours) and ticarcillin (3 gm every six or eight hours). The clinical and bacteriological responses to treatment were satisfactory in most of the patients in both treatment groups. Clinical cure was achieved in 18 of the 20 patients treated with ceftazidime and in 17 of the 20 treated with amikacin-ticarcillin. The bacterial eradication rate was 19 of 21 pathogens in the ceftazidime group and 17 of 20 pathogens in the amikacin-ticarcillin group.

摘要

患有严重革兰氏阴性菌感染的住院患者被随机分配接受头孢他啶治疗(每8或12小时2克)或阿米卡星(每12小时500毫克)与替卡西林(每6或8小时3克)联合治疗。两个治疗组中的大多数患者对治疗的临床和细菌学反应都令人满意。接受头孢他啶治疗的20名患者中有18名实现了临床治愈,接受阿米卡星-替卡西林治疗的20名患者中有17名实现了临床治愈。头孢他啶组21种病原体中的19种细菌清除率,以及阿米卡星-替卡西林组20种病原体中的17种细菌清除率。

相似文献

1
Ceftazidime versus a combination of amikacin and ticarcillin in the treatment of severe infections.头孢他啶与阿米卡星联合替卡西林治疗严重感染的对比研究
Clin Ther. 1988;10(5):589-93.
2
The efficacy and safety of isepamicin and ceftazidime compared with amikacin and ceftazidime in acute lower respiratory tract infection.异帕米星与头孢他啶联用对比阿米卡星与头孢他啶联用在急性下呼吸道感染中的疗效及安全性
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:129-35.
3
[Evaluation of three types of empirical antibiotherapy in patients with febrile neutropenia: imipenem-cilastatin versus ceftazidime-vancomycin versus ticarcillin-amikacin-vancomycin].[三种经验性抗菌疗法用于发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的评估:亚胺培南-西司他丁对比头孢他啶-万古霉素对比替卡西林-阿米卡星-万古霉素]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1992 Oct;40(8):797-804.
4
Ceftazidime versus tobramycin plus ticarcillin in the treatment of soft-tissue infections.
Clin Ther. 1986;9(1):123-34.
5
Comparison of empiric aztreonam and aminoglycoside regimens in the treatment of serious gram-negative lower respiratory infections.
Clin Ther. 1993 Jan-Feb;15(1):65-78.
6
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of isepamicin and amikacin in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections caused by gram-negative organisms.
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:137-42.
7
[Imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftazidime-amikacin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients].亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢他啶-阿米卡星治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的对比研究
Rev Med Chil. 1995 Mar;123(3):312-20.
8
[Prospective randomized controlled study of a ceftazidime and pefloxacin combination versus a ceftazidime and amikacin combination in the empirical treatment of pneumonia and nosocomial septicemia at intensive care units].头孢他啶与培氟沙星联合用药对比头孢他啶与阿米卡星联合用药在重症监护病房肺炎和医院感染败血症经验性治疗中的前瞻性随机对照研究
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1989 May;37(5):496-9.
9
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of isepamicin compared with amikacin in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and septicaemia.异帕米星与阿米卡星治疗医院获得性肺炎和败血症的疗效及安全性评估。
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:165-73.
10
Efficacy of the combination of levofloxacin plus ceftazidime in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit.左氧氟沙星联合头孢他啶治疗重症监护病房医院获得性肺炎的疗效
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Dec;28(6):582-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.β-内酰胺类抗生素单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗败血症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 7;2014(1):CD003344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003344.pub3.
2
Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.β-内酰胺类单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类联合治疗对免疫功能正常患者败血症的疗效:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):668. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38028.520995.63. Epub 2004 Mar 2.