Verbrugge Lois M, Latham Kenzie, Clarke Philippa J
1 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
2 Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Res Aging. 2017 Jul;39(6):741-777. doi: 10.1177/0164027516681051. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
This analysis brings "aging with disability" into middle and older ages. We study U.S. adults ages 51+ and ages 65+ with persistent disability (physical, household management, personal care; physical limitations, instrumental activities of daily living [IADLs], activities of daily living [ADLs]), using Health and Retirement Study data. Two complementary approaches are used to identify persons with persistent disability, one based directly on observed data and the other on latent classes. Both approaches show that persistent disability is more common for persons ages 65+ than ages 51+ and more common for physical limitations than IADLs and ADLs. People with persistent disability have social and health disadvantages compared to people with other longitudinal experiences. The analysis integrates two research avenues, aging with disability and disability trajectories. It gives empirical heft to government efforts to make aging with disability an age-free (all ages) rather than age-targeted (children and youths) perspective.
这项分析将“伴有残疾的老龄化”问题带入了中老年阶段。我们利用健康与退休研究数据,对年龄在51岁及以上以及65岁及以上患有持续性残疾(身体、家务管理、个人护理;身体限制、工具性日常生活活动[IADL]、日常生活活动[ADL])的美国成年人进行了研究。我们采用了两种互补的方法来识别患有持续性残疾的人,一种直接基于观察数据,另一种基于潜在类别。两种方法均表明,持续性残疾在65岁及以上人群中比在51岁及以上人群中更为常见,在身体限制方面比在IADL和ADL方面更为常见。与有其他纵向经历的人相比,患有持续性残疾的人在社会和健康方面处于劣势。该分析整合了两条研究途径,即伴有残疾的老龄化和残疾轨迹。它为政府将伴有残疾的老龄化从针对特定年龄(儿童和青年)的视角转变为无年龄限制(所有年龄)的视角所做的努力提供了实证依据。