• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Postural Changes in Measures of Arterial Stiffness in Hypertensive Subjects on Antihypertensive Drug Therapy: A Prospective, Pilot Study.接受抗高血压药物治疗的高血压患者动脉僵硬度测量中的姿势变化:一项前瞻性试点研究。
Int J Angiol. 2017 Jun;26(2):78-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1572416. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
2
Can arterial stiffness parameters be measured in the sitting position?动脉僵硬度参数能否在坐姿下测量?
Hypertens Res. 2011 Feb;34(2):202-8. doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.196. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
3
[Analysis on the characteristics of postural blood pressure changes recorded with continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring system and the correlative factors in elderly hospitalized patients].[老年住院患者连续无创动脉压监测系统记录的体位血压变化特征及相关因素分析]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 May 24;47(5):381-387. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.05.009.
4
Reliability of oscillometric central blood pressure and central systolic loading in individuals over 50 years: Effects of posture and fasting.50 岁以上人群中,示波法中心血压和中心收缩压负荷的可靠性:体位和禁食的影响。
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Feb;269:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.12.030. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
5
Efficacy of various antihypertensive agents as evaluated by indices of vascular stiffness in elderly hypertensive patients.通过血管僵硬度指标评估不同降压药物对老年高血压患者的疗效。
Hypertens Res. 2003 Aug;26(8):609-14. doi: 10.1291/hypres.26.609.
6
Radial pressure pulse and heart rate variability in normotensive and hypertensive subjects.正常血压和高血压患者的桡动脉脉搏波和心率变异性。
J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Oct;17(10):945-52. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0326. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
7
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors effect on arterial stiffness and wave reflections: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对动脉僵硬度和波反射的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Mar;221(1):18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.12.005. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
8
Does it matter whether blood pressure measurements are taken with subjects sitting or supine?测量血压时受试者是坐着还是仰卧着有关系吗?
J Hypertens. 1998 Mar;16(3):263-8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816030-00002.
9
Arterial wave reflection during antihypertensive therapy with barnidipine: a 6-month, open-label study using an integrated cardiovascular ultrasound approach in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension.在使用巴尼地平进行降压治疗期间的动脉波反射:一项使用综合心血管超声方法的 6 个月、开放性研究,入组了新诊断为高血压的患者。
Clin Ther. 2009 Dec;31(12):2873-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.12.011.
10
[Optimization of BP Control and Arterial Elasticity With Fixed Combination Therapy Perindopril and Amlodipine In Patients With Arterial Hypertension and Increased Pulse Wave Velocity].[培哚普利与氨氯地平固定复方疗法对高血压合并脉搏波速度升高患者血压控制及动脉弹性的优化作用]
Kardiologiia. 2017 Mar;57(3):31-38.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of supine versus sitting position on noninvasive assessment of aortic pressure waveform: a randomized cross-over study.仰卧位与坐位对主动脉压力波形无创评估的影响:一项随机交叉研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2014 Apr;28(4):236-41. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2013.101. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
2
Major impact of body position on arterial stiffness indices derived from radial applanation tonometry in pregnant and nonpregnant women.体位对源自孕妇和非孕妇桡动脉顺应性测压的动脉僵硬度指数的主要影响。
J Hypertens. 2012 Jun;30(6):1161-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328352abf9.
3
Does aortic stiffness improve the prediction of coronary heart disease in elderly? The Rotterdam Study.主动脉僵硬程度能否提高老年人心血管疾病预测的准确性?鹿特丹研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2012 Jan;26(1):28-34. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.124. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
4
Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study.动脉僵硬度与心血管事件:弗雷明汉心脏研究。
Circulation. 2010 Feb 2;121(4):505-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.886655. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
5
Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study.与肱动脉血压相比,中心血压与血管疾病及预后的关联更为密切:强心研究。
Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50(1):197-203. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089078. Epub 2007 May 7.
6
Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.盎格鲁-斯堪的纳维亚心脏结局试验-降压分支(ASCOT-BPLA):氨氯地平降压方案按需加用培哚普利与阿替洛尔按需加用苄氟噻嗪预防心血管事件的多中心随机对照试验
Lancet. 2005;366(9489):895-906. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67185-1.
7
Elevated aortic pulse wave velocity, a marker of arterial stiffness, predicts cardiovascular events in well-functioning older adults.升高的主动脉脉搏波速度是动脉僵硬度的一个指标,可预测功能良好的老年人发生心血管事件的风险。
Circulation. 2005 Jun 28;111(25):3384-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.483628. Epub 2005 Jun 20.
8
Aortic pressure augmentation predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established coronary artery disease.主动脉压力增强可预测已确诊冠心病患者的不良心血管事件。
Hypertension. 2005 May;45(5):980-5. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000165025.16381.44. Epub 2005 Apr 18.
9
Arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and the risk of coronary artery disease.动脉僵硬度、波反射与冠状动脉疾病风险
Circulation. 2004 Jan 20;109(2):184-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000105767.94169.E3. Epub 2003 Dec 8.
10
Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension.主动脉僵硬度是原发性高血压患者致命性卒中的独立预测因素。
Stroke. 2003 May;34(5):1203-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000065428.03209.64. Epub 2003 Apr 3.

接受抗高血压药物治疗的高血压患者动脉僵硬度测量中的姿势变化:一项前瞻性试点研究。

Postural Changes in Measures of Arterial Stiffness in Hypertensive Subjects on Antihypertensive Drug Therapy: A Prospective, Pilot Study.

作者信息

Sule Ashish Anil, Jun Du Qi, Cheong Chin Yee

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, Vascular Medicine and Hypertension, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Tan Tock Seng, Singapore.

出版信息

Int J Angiol. 2017 Jun;26(2):78-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1572416. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1055/s-0036-1572416
PMID:28566932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5446248/
Abstract

Prospective study with a controlled arm to know if there are variations of measures of arterial stiffness with posture in subjects with hypertension on antihypertensive medications. We studied postural variations of measures of arterial stiffness in 21 subjects with diagnosed hypertension on antihypertensive medications and compared them with 21 normotensive subjects. All subjects underwent pulse-wave analysis on SphygmoCor in the morning between 8 am to 10 am initially in supine and then in sitting position after 3 minutes. Summary measures on demographics, and blood pressure characteristics at sitting and supine positions are obtained. Differences between characteristics at supine and sitting position are compared using nonparametric paired test of Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A value of  < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Antihypertensive medications decreased the supine aortic augmentation pressure (AAP) and augmentation index (AI) but not significantly. When subgroups of patients with antihypertensive treatment were analyzed, it was noted that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker group (12) decreased AAP and AI significantly in supine position compared with patients on other antihypertensive medications (9) (-value 0.034 and 0.038, respectively). There was no significant difference in other groups of calcium channel blockers, β-blockers, or diuretics. However, in normotensive control arm, there was an increase in AAP and AI in the supine position. In hypertensive subjects, on antihypertensive, there was reduction in AAP and AI in supine position compared with those of normotensives. The significance of the decrease in AAP and AI in supine position on antihypertensive needs to be studied further.

摘要

一项设有对照组的前瞻性研究,旨在了解服用抗高血压药物的高血压患者的动脉僵硬度测量值是否会随体位变化。我们研究了21名确诊为高血压且正在服用抗高血压药物的受试者的动脉僵硬度测量值的体位变化,并将其与21名血压正常的受试者进行比较。所有受试者于上午8点至10点在SphygmoCor上进行脉搏波分析,最初为仰卧位,3分钟后改为坐位。获取了人口统计学的汇总指标以及坐位和仰卧位时的血压特征。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验的非参数配对检验比较仰卧位和坐位特征之间的差异。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。抗高血压药物降低了仰卧位主动脉增强压(AAP)和增强指数(AI),但不显著。当分析接受抗高血压治疗的患者亚组时,发现与服用其他抗高血压药物的患者(9名)相比,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂组(12名)在仰卧位时AAP和AI显著降低(P值分别为0.034和0.038)。钙通道阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂或利尿剂的其他组之间无显著差异。然而,在血压正常的对照组中,仰卧位时AAP和AI有所增加。在服用抗高血压药物的高血压受试者中,仰卧位时AAP和AI较血压正常者降低。仰卧位时AAP和AI降低在抗高血压方面的意义需要进一步研究。