• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用大规模健康相关生活质量数据集生成个性化预测,并告知患者手术可能带来的益处。

Use of large-scale HRQoL datasets to generate individualised predictions and inform patients about the likely benefit of surgery.

作者信息

Gutacker Nils, Street Andrew

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2017 Sep;26(9):2497-2505. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1599-0. Epub 2017 May 31.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-017-1599-0
PMID:28567601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5548850/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The English NHS has mandated the routine collection of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data before and after surgery, giving prospective patient information about the likely benefit of surgery. Yet, the information is difficult to access and interpret because it is not presented in a lay-friendly format and does not reflect patients' individual circumstances. We set out a methodology to generate personalised information to help patients make informed decisions.

METHODS

We used anonymised, pre- and postoperative EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D) data for over 490,000 English NHS patients who underwent primary hip or knee replacement surgery or groin hernia repair between April 2009 and March 2016. We estimated linear regression models to relate changes in EQ-5D utility scores to patients' own assessment of the success of surgery, and calculated from that minimally important differences for health improvements/deteriorations. Classification tree analysis was used to develop algorithms that sort patients into homogeneous groups that best predict postoperative EQ-5D utility scores.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into between 55 (hip replacement) to 60 (hernia repair) homogeneous groups. The classifications explained between 14 and 27% of variation in postoperative EQ-5D utility score.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are heterogeneous in their expected benefit from surgery, and decision aids should reflect this. Large administrative datasets on HRQoL can be used to generate the required individualised predictions to inform patients.

摘要

目的

英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)规定在手术前后常规收集与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)数据,为患者提供手术可能带来的益处的前瞻性信息。然而,这些信息难以获取和解读,因为其呈现形式并非通俗易懂,且未反映患者的个体情况。我们提出了一种方法来生成个性化信息,以帮助患者做出明智的决策。

方法

我们使用了2009年4月至2016年3月期间在英国NHS接受初次髋关节或膝关节置换手术或腹股沟疝修补术的49万多名患者的匿名术前和术后欧洲五维健康量表-3水平(EQ-5D)数据。我们估计了线性回归模型,以将EQ-5D效用评分的变化与患者对手术成功的自我评估联系起来,并据此计算出健康改善/恶化的最小重要差异。使用分类树分析来开发算法,将患者分为最能预测术后EQ-5D效用评分的同质组。

结果

患者被分为55组(髋关节置换)至60组(疝修补)的同质组。这些分类解释了术后EQ-5D效用评分中14%至27%的变异。

结论

患者从手术中获得的预期益处存在异质性,决策辅助工具应反映这一点。关于HRQoL的大型行政数据集可用于生成所需的个性化预测,为患者提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d0b/5548850/9b7b5c4a8d58/11136_2017_1599_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d0b/5548850/1f92eeeea158/11136_2017_1599_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d0b/5548850/8aa20c1ecd12/11136_2017_1599_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d0b/5548850/9b7b5c4a8d58/11136_2017_1599_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d0b/5548850/1f92eeeea158/11136_2017_1599_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d0b/5548850/8aa20c1ecd12/11136_2017_1599_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d0b/5548850/9b7b5c4a8d58/11136_2017_1599_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of large-scale HRQoL datasets to generate individualised predictions and inform patients about the likely benefit of surgery.使用大规模健康相关生活质量数据集生成个性化预测,并告知患者手术可能带来的益处。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Sep;26(9):2497-2505. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1599-0. Epub 2017 May 31.
2
Mapping analysis to predict EQ-5D-5 L utility values based on the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaires in the Spanish population suffering from lower limb osteoarthritis.基于 Oxford Hip Score (OHS) 和 Oxford Knee Score (OKS) 问卷,对西班牙下肢骨关节炎患者进行 EQ-5D-5L 效用值的预测分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 15;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01435-8.
3
EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) Validity in Assessing the Quality of Life in Adults With Asthma: Cross-Sectional Study.欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)在评估成人哮喘患者生活质量中的效度:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 23;21(1):e10178. doi: 10.2196/10178.
4
Can Mapping Algorithms Based on Raw Scores Overestimate QALYs Gained by Treatment? A Comparison of Mappings Between the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the EQ-5D-3L Based on Raw and Differenced Score Data.基于原始分数的映射算法会高估治疗所获得的质量调整生命年吗?基于原始分数和差分分数数据对罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷与EQ-5D-3L之间映射的比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 May;35(5):549-559. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0483-z.
5
Generating EQ-5D-3L Utility Scores from the Dermatology Life Quality Index: A Mapping Study in Patients with Psoriasis.从皮肤病生活质量指数生成 EQ-5D-3L 效用评分:一项针对银屑病患者的映射研究。
Value Health. 2018 Aug;21(8):1010-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
6
Health-related quality of life in residents aged 18 years and older with and without disease: findings from the First Provincial Health Services Survey of Hunan, China.健康相关生活质量在 18 岁及以上有疾病和无疾病居民中的差异:来自中国湖南省第一次省级卫生服务调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 3;7(9):e015880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015880.
7
Assessing the Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy for Labral Tears in Femoroacetabular Impingement Using the Minimum Dataset of the British Non-arthroplasty Hip Register: A Single-Surgeon Experience.评估英国非关节置换髋关节登记处最小数据集在股骨髋臼撞击症中髋关节镜治疗盂唇撕裂的疗效:单外科医生经验。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jul;34(7):2131-2139. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.038. Epub 2018 May 2.
8
The EQ-5D-5L Is Superior to the -3L Version in Measuring Health-related Quality of Life in Patients Awaiting THA or TKA.在测量等待全髋关节置换术或全膝关节置换术的患者的健康相关生活质量方面,EQ-5D-5L 优于 -3L 版本。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1632-1644. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000662.
9
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
Does inappropriate prescribing affect elderly patients' quality of life? A study from a Malaysian tertiary hospital.不适当的处方是否会影响老年患者的生活质量?来自马来西亚一家三级医院的研究。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jul;28(7):1913-1920. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02153-5. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Activity outcomes after hip arthroplasty: an information tool based on patients' experience captured in a hospital registry.髋关节置换术后的活动结果:一种基于医院登记处收集的患者经验的信息工具。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 20;26(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09024-w.
2
Association of self-efficacy, risk attitudes, and time preferences with health-related quality of life and functioning after total hip or knee replacement - Results of the MobilE-TRA 2 cohort.全髋关节或膝关节置换术后自我效能、风险态度和时间偏好与健康相关生活质量及功能的关联——MobilE-TRA 2队列研究结果
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 23;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02374-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Eliminating composite bias in treatment effects estimates: Applications to quality of life assessment.消除治疗效果估计中的综合偏倚:在生活质量评估中的应用。
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
2
Tutorial in biostatistics: data-driven subgroup identification and analysis in clinical trials.生物统计学教程:临床试验中数据驱动的亚组识别与分析
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 15;36(1):136-196. doi: 10.1002/sim.7064. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
3
Development and validation of a shared decision-making instrument for health-related quality of life one year after total hip replacement based on quality registries data.
A systematic review of minimum important changes for generic multi-attribute utility instruments and recommendations for their estimation.
通用多属性效用工具最小重要变化的系统评价及其估计建议。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01778-3.
4
How to interpret patient-reported outcomes? - Stratified adjusted minimal important changes for the EQ-5D-3L in hip and knee replacement patients.如何解释患者报告的结局?- 髋关节和膝关节置换患者的 EQ-5D-3L 分层调整的最小重要变化。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Nov 25;8(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00812-x.
5
Development of a patient-centred tool for use in total hip arthroplasty.开发一种用于全髋关节置换术的以患者为中心的工具。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0307752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307752. eCollection 2024.
6
Implementing routine collection of EQ-5D-5L in a breast cancer outpatient clinic.在乳腺癌门诊常规收集 EQ-5D-5L。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0307225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307225. eCollection 2024.
7
Implementing predictive tools in surgery: A narrative review in the context of orthopaedic surgery.在外科手术中实施预测工具:骨科手术背景下的叙述性综述。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Dec;92(12):3162-3169. doi: 10.1111/ans.18044. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
8
Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.使用 SMART Choice(膝关节)全膝关节置换术患者预后工具评估手术意愿:一项实用随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 24;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05123-0.
9
Economic burden and health-related quality of life in tenosynovial giant-cell tumour patients in Europe: an observational disease registry.欧洲腱鞘巨细胞瘤患者的经济负担和健康相关生活质量:一项观察性疾病登记研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Jul 2;16(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01883-5.
10
Concomitant back and leg pain as predictors for trajectories of poor outcome after single level lumbar micro-decompression alone and with micro-discectomy: a study of 3,308 patients.单纯单节段腰椎微减压术及联合微椎间盘切除术时,同时存在的背部和腿部疼痛作为预后不良轨迹的预测因素:一项对3308例患者的研究
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):688-702. doi: 10.21037/jss-19-462.
基于质量登记数据的全髋关节置换术后一年健康相关生活质量共享决策工具的开发与验证
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/jep.12603. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
4
Impact and Feasibility of Personalized Decision Support for Older Patients with Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Trial.个性化决策支持对老年糖尿病患者的影响及可行性:一项试点随机试验
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jul;37(5):611-617. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16654142. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?评估英格兰普通人群的健康状况:EQ-5D的三级版本和五级版本对比情况如何?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 21;13:171. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8.
6
Should English healthcare providers be penalised for failing to collect patient-reported outcome measures? A retrospective analysis.英国医疗服务提供者因未收集患者报告的结局指标而应受到惩罚吗?一项回顾性分析。
J R Soc Med. 2015 Aug;108(8):304-16. doi: 10.1177/0141076815576700. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
7
Putting the Patient in Patient Reported Outcomes: A Robust Methodology for Health Outcomes Assessment.将患者纳入患者报告结局:一种用于健康结局评估的可靠方法。
Health Econ. 2015 Dec;24(12):1588-603. doi: 10.1002/hec.3113. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
8
Concepts of 'personalization' in personalized medicine: implications for economic evaluation.个性化医疗中的“个性化”概念:对经济评估的影响
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Jan;33(1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0211-5.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
10
What is personalized medicine: sharpening a vague term based on a systematic literature review.什么是个性化医学:基于系统文献回顾来明晰一个模糊的术语。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Dec 21;14:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-55.