• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用PSP技术的生物可吸收支架在糖尿病和非糖尿病患者中的长期临床结果。

Long-term clinical results of bioresorbable absorb scaffolds using the PSP-technique in patients with and without diabetes.

作者信息

Markovic Sinisa, Kugler Christine, Rottbauer Wolfgang, Wöhrle Jochen

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Aug;30(4):325-330. doi: 10.1111/joic.12392. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1111/joic.12392
PMID:28568564
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated clinical results up to 36 months after implantation of Absorb BVS using PSP-technique and compared the outcome of patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND

Absorb II demonstrated that interventional treatment of coronary artery disease with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) without proper PSP-technique (pre-dilation, proper sizing, and post-dilation) is associated with an increased thrombotic risk, even in simple lesions.

METHODS

In this prospective study 319 patients with 420 lesions were enrolled and treated with the Absorb BVS. Pre-dilation was mandatory and post-dilation with a high-pressure balloon was performed in patients with a scaffold length >12 mm. Patients were clinically followed up to 3 years. Primary outcome measure was the device-oriented endpoint (DoCE) defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction not clearly related to a non-target vessel and target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

DoCE was 5.0%, 7.1%, and 10.0% after 12, 24, and 36 months for the total population. Rate of scaffold thrombosis was 0.5%, 0.8%, and 1.4% after 12, 24, and 36 months. Rate of DoCE was higher in the diabetic subgroup with 9.1%, 12.6%, and 12.9% after 12, 24, and 36 months compared with 4.0% (P = 0.13), 5.6% (P = 0.05), and 9.9% (P = 0.20) in patients without diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with the Absorb BVS using the PSP-technique show good results up to 3 years with a low rate of scaffold thrombosis. Patients suffering from diabetes mellitus have an increased rate of DoCE compared with non-diabetic patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov_NCT02162056.

摘要

目的

我们评估了采用PSP技术植入Absorb生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)后36个月内的临床结果,并比较了糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的治疗结果。

背景

Absorb II研究表明,即使在简单病变中,使用生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)对冠状动脉疾病进行介入治疗时,如果没有适当的PSP技术(预扩张、合适的尺寸选择和后扩张),血栓形成风险也会增加。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了319例患者的420处病变,并采用Absorb BVS进行治疗。预扩张是必需的,对于支架长度>12 mm的患者,使用高压球囊进行后扩张。对患者进行了长达3年的临床随访。主要结局指标是器械导向终点(DoCE),定义为心源性死亡、与非靶血管无明确关联的心肌梗死以及靶病变血运重建。

结果

总体人群在12、24和36个月时的DoCE分别为5.0%、7.1%和10.0%。支架血栓形成率在12、24和36个月时分别为0.5%、0.8%和1.4%。糖尿病亚组的DoCE率在12、24和36个月时分别为9.1%、12.6%和12.9%,高于非糖尿病患者的4.0%(P = 0.13)、5.6%(P = 0.05)和9.9%(P = 0.20)。

结论

采用PSP技术使用Absorb BVS治疗的患者在长达3年的时间里显示出良好的结果,支架血栓形成率较低。与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的DoCE率更高。

临床试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov_NCT02162056。

相似文献

1
Long-term clinical results of bioresorbable absorb scaffolds using the PSP-technique in patients with and without diabetes.采用PSP技术的生物可吸收支架在糖尿病和非糖尿病患者中的长期临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Aug;30(4):325-330. doi: 10.1111/joic.12392. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
2
Clinical results of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in short and long coronary artery lesions using the PSP technique.应用 PSP 技术治疗短和长冠状动脉病变的生物可吸收药物洗脱支架的临床结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0994-y.
3
Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Analysis From the ABSORB Trials.生物可吸收血管支架置入术后技术对结局的影响:ABSORB 试验分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2863-2874. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1106. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
4
Mid- to long-term outcome of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Data of the BVS registry Göttingen predominantly from ACS patients.接受依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗患者的中长期结局:哥廷根生物可吸收血管支架注册研究数据,主要来自急性冠状动脉综合征患者。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 1;234:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.069. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果:BVS-EXAMINATION 研究(生物可吸收血管支架——依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.005.
6
1-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a pooled analysis of the ABSORB and the SPIRIT trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗糖尿病患者 1 年的临床结果:ABSORB 和 SPIRIT 试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):482-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.155. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
7
Thirty-Day Outcomes After Unrestricted Implantation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (from the Prospective RAI Registry).生物可吸收血管支架无限制植入术后30天的结果(来自前瞻性RAI注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 15;119(12):1924-1930. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
8
Randomised comparison of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold with a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: the 2-year clinical outcomes of the ABSORB II trial.生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱支架与金属依维莫司洗脱支架治疗初发原位冠状动脉病变所致缺血性心脏病的随机对照研究:ABSORB II试验的2年临床结果
EuroIntervention. 2016 Oct 20;12(9):1102-1107. doi: 10.4244/EIJY16M08_01.
9
Long-term outcomes of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold using predilation, sizing, and postdilation protocol in a real-world patient population.在真实世界患者人群中,使用预扩张、测量和后扩张方案的 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架的长期结果。
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2021 Jan;49(1):40-50. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2020.99249.
10
2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy.2 年随访:Absorb 生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉疾病:7 项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析及一项个体化患者数据分析亚研究。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):760-772. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31470-8. Epub 2017 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-year clinical outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to Xience everolimus-eluting stent in routine PCI in patients with diabetes mellitus-AIDA sub-study.在常规经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中,与依维莫司洗脱支架相比,生物可吸收血管支架的 3 年临床结果:糖尿病患者 AIDA 亚组研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):713-720. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29329. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
2
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?生物可吸收血管支架——死胡同还是仍为璞玉?
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 7;8(12):2167. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122167.
3
Three-years outcomes of diabetic patients treated with coronary bioresorbable scaffolds.
接受冠状动脉生物可吸收支架治疗的糖尿病患者的三年随访结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 10;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0811-7.
4
Mid-term outcomes of the Absorb BVS versus second-generation DES: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Absorb BVS 与第二代 DES 的中期结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 9;13(5):e0197119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197119. eCollection 2018.