Suppr超能文献

伊朗女性乳腺钼靶自我效能感及乳腺癌恐惧量表的心理测量学特性

Psychometric properties of the mammography self-efficacy and fear of breast cancer scales in Iranian women.

作者信息

Moshki Mahdi, Shahgheibi Shole, Taymoori Parvaneh, Moradi Amjad, Roshani Deam, Holt Cheryl L

机构信息

Department of Public Health, School of Health Sciences; Social Development & Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2017 May 31;17(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4404-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research investigating mammography screening has often reported low mammography self-efficacy and breast cancer fear contribute to underutilization of mammography. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of Champion's Mammography Self-efficacy Scale (CMSS) and Champion's Breast Cancer Fear Scale (CBCFS) in a sample of Iranian women.

METHODS

The adapted instruments were administered to a community sample of 482 women aged 40 years or older. They inhibited in Sanandaj, Iran. Cronbach's α coefficients, item-total, and test-retest correlations were used to assess the reliability of the scales. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to assess construct validity.

RESULTS

The α coefficients for the Farsi 14-item CMSS and 8-item BCFS were .87 and.95, respectively. In terms of the CMSS confirmatory factor analysis, the proportion of x /df was 2.4, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.93, Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.96 providing a strong fit to the data induced by two-factor model. With regard to CBCFS, x /df was 86.33, CFI =0.99, and TLI =0.99 supporting one-factor model.

CONCLUSION

The CMSS and CBCFS exhibited strong initial psychometric properties; therefore, they are recommended to understand women's breast cancer screening behaviors better.

摘要

背景

关于乳腺钼靶筛查的研究经常报告称,乳腺钼靶自我效能感低和对乳腺癌的恐惧导致了乳腺钼靶检查的利用不足。本研究旨在检验Champion乳腺钼靶自我效能量表(CMSS)和Champion乳腺癌恐惧量表(CBCFS)在伊朗女性样本中的信度和效度。

方法

将改编后的工具应用于482名40岁及以上女性的社区样本。她们居住在伊朗的Sanandaj。采用Cronbach's α系数、项目总分相关性和重测相关性来评估量表的信度。应用验证性因素分析来评估结构效度。

结果

波斯语版14项CMSS和8项BCFS的α系数分别为0.87和0.95。就CMSS验证性因素分析而言,x/df比例为2.4,比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.93,塔克·刘易斯指数(TLI)=0.96,表明两因素模型对数据的拟合度较高。对于CBCFS,x/df为86.33,CFI =0.99,TLI =0.99,支持单因素模型。

结论

CMSS和CBCFS表现出很强的初始心理测量学特性;因此,建议使用它们来更好地理解女性的乳腺癌筛查行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcd/5452424/4f50fbcf7b90/12889_2017_4404_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验