• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

StarT Back筛查工具在物理治疗实践中对腰痛患者的可靠性及筛查能力:一项队列研究

Reliability and screening ability of the StarT Back screening tool in patients with low back pain in physiotherapy practice, a cohort study.

作者信息

Robinson Hilde Stendal, Dagfinrud Hanne

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 31;18(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1553-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-017-1553-x
PMID:28569152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5452390/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common reported musculoskeletal disorder, with large prevalence numbers and high costs. Focus on early identification of patients at risk of developing chronic LBP has increased. The Keele Start Back Tool (SBT) is a questionnaire aiming at screening prognostic indicators in LBP patients, categorizing patients into risk-groups and guide treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the Norwegian version of the SBT with regard to reliability of the SBT-scoring and the screening ability in LBP patients in primary care physiotherapy.

METHODS

LBP patients answered a package of questionnaires twice, with 1-3 days in between, containing SBT, Hannover functional ability questionnaire, pain intensity questions and demographics. The relative and absolute reliability of SBT was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the smallest detectable change respectively. Independent sample t-tests were used for group comparisons.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients with LBP. Mean age (SD) was 45 (12) years and 62% were female. The ICC (95% CI) for SBT total score and psychosocial subscore was 0.89 (0.82, 0.94) and 0.82 (0.70, 0.90) respectively. None of the participants were allocated to the high risk group. The medium risk group reported significantly more pain last week and more activity limitations than the low risk group at both test and retest (0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.003), whereas no significant difference between the groups was found on pain now (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

The Norwegian version of the SBT was reliable and the screening ability was good as the subgrouping of patients into risk-groups reflected the severity of their back problems. The SBT may be an applicable and useful tool in physiotherapy practice.

摘要

背景

腰痛(LBP)是报告中最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,患病率高且成本高昂。对慢性腰痛高危患者进行早期识别的关注度日益增加。基尔启动背部工具(SBT)是一份问卷,旨在筛查腰痛患者的预后指标,将患者分为风险组并指导治疗。本研究的目的是探讨挪威版SBT在初级保健物理治疗中腰痛患者的SBT评分可靠性和筛查能力。

方法

腰痛患者两次回答一组问卷,间隔1 - 3天,问卷包括SBT、汉诺威功能能力问卷、疼痛强度问题和人口统计学信息。分别使用组内相关系数(ICC)和最小可检测变化计算SBT的相对和绝对可靠性。采用独立样本t检验进行组间比较。

结果

52例腰痛患者。平均年龄(标准差)为45(12)岁,62%为女性。SBT总分和心理社会子评分的ICC(95%可信区间)分别为0.89(0.82,0.94)和0.82(0.70,0.90)。没有参与者被分配到高风险组。在测试和复测时,中风险组上周报告的疼痛明显多于低风险组,活动受限也更多(0.001≤p≤0.003),而两组目前的疼痛无显著差异(0.05≤p≤0.16)。

结论

挪威版SBT可靠,筛查能力良好,因为将患者分为风险组反映了他们背部问题的严重程度。SBT可能是物理治疗实践中一种适用且有用的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6b/5452390/4b6c9da9d74f/12891_2017_1553_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6b/5452390/64beefabe19d/12891_2017_1553_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6b/5452390/4b6c9da9d74f/12891_2017_1553_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6b/5452390/64beefabe19d/12891_2017_1553_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6b/5452390/4b6c9da9d74f/12891_2017_1553_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and screening ability of the StarT Back screening tool in patients with low back pain in physiotherapy practice, a cohort study.StarT Back筛查工具在物理治疗实践中对腰痛患者的可靠性及筛查能力:一项队列研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 31;18(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1553-x.
2
Validity and reliability of the French version of the STarT Back screening tool for patients with low back pain.《STarT 后背筛查工具法语版用于腰痛患者的有效性和可靠性》。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 15;39(2):E123-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000062.
3
Evaluation of the STarT Back Screening Tool for Prediction of Low Back Pain Intensity in an Outpatient Physical Therapy Setting.在门诊物理治疗环境中评估STarT Back筛查工具对下背痛强度的预测能力。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Apr;47(4):261-267. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7284. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
4
Subgrouping for patients with low back pain: a multidimensional approach incorporating cluster analysis and the STarT Back Screening Tool.腰痛患者的亚组划分:一种结合聚类分析和STarT Back筛查工具的多维度方法。
J Pain. 2015 Jan;16(1):19-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
5
Screening for yellow flags in first-time acute low back pain: reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire.首次急性下腰痛患者的“黄旗”筛查:挪威版急性下腰痛筛查问卷的信度和效度
Clin J Pain. 2006 Jun;22(5):458-67. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000208243.33498.cb.
6
Subgrouping low back pain: a comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.分组腰痛:STarT 背部工具与奥勒布罗肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷的比较。
Eur J Pain. 2010 Jan;14(1):83-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
7
Can Primary Care for Back and/or Neck Pain in the Netherlands Benefit From Stratification for Risk Groups According to the STarT Back Tool Classification?根据STarT Back工具分类对风险群体进行分层,荷兰针对背部和/或颈部疼痛的初级保健能否从中受益?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
8
Translation and validation of the Persian version of the STarT Back Screening Tool in patients with nonspecific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛患者中STarT Back筛查工具波斯语版本的翻译与验证
Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):850-4. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool was limited in people with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study.STarT 后背工具在慢性下背痛患者中的预测能力有限:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Physiother. 2018 Apr;64(2):107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
The StarT back screening tool and a pain mannequin improve triage in individuals with low back pain at risk of a worse prognosis - a population based cohort study.StarT 后背筛查工具和疼痛人体模型可改善预后较差的腰痛患者的分诊情况 - 一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 22;20(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2836-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and risk factors of non-specific low back pain among amateur overhead athletes in Gauteng Province.豪登省业余上肢运动员非特异性下腰痛的患病率及危险因素
S Afr J Sports Med. 2025 May 15;37(1):v37i1a18797. doi: 10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a18797. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk Stratification in a Tertiary Care Spine Centre: Comparison Between STarTBack and OSPRO-YF Screening Tools.三级医疗脊柱中心的风险分层:STarTBack与OSPRO-YF筛查工具的比较
Physiother Can. 2023 May 1;75(2):158-166. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0026. eCollection 2023 May.
3
A single session of education for a patient with negative beliefs about low back pain: A case report of 16-month follow-up.

本文引用的文献

1
What have we learned from ten years of trajectory research in low back pain?在腰痛轨迹研究的十年中我们学到了什么?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 21;17:220. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1071-2.
2
Validation of the German version of the STarT-Back Tool (STarT-G): a cohort study with patients from primary care practices.STarT背部工具德文版(STarT-G)的验证:一项针对基层医疗诊所患者的队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 11;16:346. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0806-9.
3
Transcultural adaption and psychometric properties of the STarT Back Screening Tool among Finnish low back pain patients.
单次教育对负面腰痛信念患者的影响:16 个月随访的病例报告。
J Med Life. 2023 Feb;16(2):325-328. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0248.
4
A Scoping Review of Chronic Low Back Pain Classification Schemes Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.基于患者报告结局的慢性下背痛分类方案的范围综述。
Pain Physician. 2022 Sep;25(6):471-482.
5
Validation of the Subgroups for Targeted Treatment for Back (STarT Back) screening tool at a tertiary care centre.验证针对背部的靶向治疗亚组(STarT Back)筛查工具在三级护理中心的有效性。
Can J Surg. 2022 May 17;65(3):E352-E358. doi: 10.1503/cjs.010720. Print 2022 May-Jun.
6
Development and external validation of a prediction model for patient-relevant outcomes in patients with chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia.开发并外部验证了一个用于慢性广泛性疼痛和纤维肌痛患者相关结局预测的模型。
Eur J Pain. 2022 May;26(5):1123-1134. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1937. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
7
Factor Structure, Validity, and Reliability of the STarT Back Screening Tool in Italian Obese and Non-obese Patients With Low Back Pain.意大利肥胖和非肥胖腰痛患者中STarT Back筛查工具的因子结构、效度和信度
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:740851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740851. eCollection 2021.
8
Consumer understanding of terms used in imaging reports requested for low back pain: a cross-sectional survey.消费者对用于影像学报告的术语的理解:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 13;11(9):e049938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049938.
9
Wearables-based walking program in addition to usual physiotherapy care for the management of patients with low back pain at medium or high risk of chronicity: A pilot randomized controlled trial.基于可穿戴设备的步行方案联合常规物理治疗用于管理中高危腰痛慢性风险患者:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0256459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256459. eCollection 2021.
10
How manual therapy provided a gateway to a biopsychosocial management approach in an adult with chronic post-surgical low back pain: a case report.手法治疗如何为慢性术后腰痛成年患者提供生物心理社会管理方法的切入点:病例报告。
J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Apr;29(2):107-132. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1813472. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
芬兰下背痛患者中STarT Back筛查工具的跨文化调适及心理测量特性
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):287-295. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3804-6. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Chinese version of the STarT Back Screening Tool in patients with low back pain.STarT 背部筛查工具中文版在腰痛患者中的跨文化调适、信度及效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jul 15;39(16):E974-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000413.
5
The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.全球腰痛负担:来自 2010 年全球疾病负担研究的估计。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
The predictive and external validity of the STarT Back Tool in Danish primary care.丹麦初级保健中 STarT 后背工具的预测和外部有效性。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1859-67. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2690-z. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
7
Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial.分层初级保健管理与当前最佳实践治疗腰痛的比较(STarT Back):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
8
The Epidemiology of low back pain.腰痛的流行病学。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Dec;24(6):769-81. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002.
9
Early identification and management of psychological risk factors ("yellow flags") in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal.早期识别和管理低背痛患者的心理风险因素(“黄牌”):再评价。
Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):737-53. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100224. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
10
Relative and absolute reliability of physical function measures in people with end-stage renal disease.终末期肾病患者身体功能测量的相对可靠性和绝对可靠性
Physiother Can. 2010 Spring;62(2):122-8. doi: 10.3138/physio.62.2.122. Epub 2010 Apr 23.