• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施社区驱动的研究伙伴关系:后院倡议社区健康调查方法与途径。

Implementing a Community-Driven Research Partnership: The Backyard Initiative Community Health Survey Methods and Approach.

作者信息

Orionzi Dimpho E, Mink Pamela J, Azzahir Atum, Yusuf Amged A, Jernigan Mau J, Dahlem Janet L, Anderson Mark J, Trahan Lovel, Rosenberg-Carlson Elena

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(4):493-503. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0057.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2016.0057
PMID:28569674
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In community-based participatory research (CBPR), issues such as creating a setting where community members drive decisions and creating culturally relevant processes remain largely underachieved. The Backyard Initiative (BYI) provided the setting for implementing a community-centered collaborative research process. The BYI is a partnership between Allina Health, the Cultural Wellness Center (CWC), and community residents to improve health.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the unique community-centered method used in the 2013 BYI Community Health Survey (CHS) as a viable approach for collecting meaningful and valid health related data. With this approach, the community operates as the agent of change rather than the target.

METHODS

At the core was the BYI assessment team, which brought together conventional researchers and community members to collaboratively design, implement, analyze, interpret, and disseminate the CHS results. Focusing on the CHS, this structure and process permitted and facilitated important and difficult discussions about approach, content and outcomes of the research.

RESULTS

We held seven sessions (239 participants). Participants were 37% African American/African and 34% Native American, 65% female, and 72% spoke English at home. Achievement of our recruitment goals, participation of groups typically underrepresented in research, and positive community feedback were indications that the BYI approach to survey research was successful.

CONCLUSIONS

The BYI CHS community-centered methods built trust among research partners and participants, engaged populations often underrepresented in research, and collected meaningful data. Our success indicates that it is possible to co-design and implement a lengthy survey to inform future research and community activities.

摘要

背景

在社区参与式研究(CBPR)中,诸如营造社区成员主导决策的环境以及创建具有文化相关性的流程等问题在很大程度上仍未得到充分解决。后院倡议(BYI)为实施以社区为中心的合作研究过程提供了环境。BYI是艾利纳健康集团、文化健康中心(CWC)和社区居民之间的合作伙伴关系,旨在改善健康状况。

目的

描述2013年BYI社区健康调查(CHS)中使用的独特的以社区为中心的方法,作为收集有意义且有效的健康相关数据的可行方法。通过这种方法,社区成为变革的推动者而非目标对象。

方法

核心是BYI评估团队,该团队将传统研究人员和社区成员聚集在一起,共同设计、实施、分析、解释和传播CHS结果。围绕CHS,这种结构和过程允许并促进了关于研究方法、内容和结果的重要且艰难的讨论。

结果

我们举办了七场会议(239名参与者)。参与者中37%为非裔美国人/非洲人,34%为美洲原住民,65%为女性,72%在家说英语。实现我们的招募目标、让研究中通常代表性不足的群体参与以及获得积极的社区反馈表明BYI的调查研究方法是成功的。

结论

BYI CHS以社区为中心的方法在研究伙伴和参与者之间建立了信任,让研究中通常代表性不足的人群参与进来,并收集了有意义的数据。我们的成功表明,共同设计和实施一项冗长的调查以为未来研究和社区活动提供信息是可行的。

相似文献

1
Implementing a Community-Driven Research Partnership: The Backyard Initiative Community Health Survey Methods and Approach.实施社区驱动的研究伙伴关系:后院倡议社区健康调查方法与途径。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(4):493-503. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0057.
2
Developing a community-academic partnership to improve recognition and treatment of depression in underserved African American and white elders.发展社区-学术伙伴关系,以改善服务不足的非裔美国人和白人老年人中抑郁症的识别和治疗。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;17(11):953-64. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31818f3a7e.
3
The Development of a Collaborative Self-Evaluation Process for Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships Using the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model and Other Adaptable Tools.利用基于社区的参与性研究概念模型和其他适用工具,为基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系开发协作式自我评估过程。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(3):225-235. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0050.
4
Partnering with Indigenous student co-researchers: improving research processes and outcomes.与原住民学生共同研究者合作:改善研究过程与成果。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Jul 27;74:27838. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.27838. eCollection 2015.
5
Challenges and lessons learned in developing a community-based health survey.开展基于社区的健康调查所面临的挑战及经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Summer;2(2):99-104. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0022.
6
Improving Rigor in a Door-to-Door Health Survey: A Participatory Approach in a Low-Income Latino Neighborhood.提高挨家挨户健康调查的严谨性:低收入拉丁裔社区的参与式方法。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016 Spring;10(1):103-11. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0015.
7
Assessing process and outcomes: evaluating community-based participatory research.评估过程与结果:评价基于社区的参与性研究。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Summer;2(2):85-6, 87-97. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0020.
8
Community Interactive Research Workshop Series: Community Members Engaged as Team Teachers to Conduct Research.社区互动研究工作坊系列:社区成员作为团队教师参与开展研究
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(2):215-221. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0026.
9
Community-Based Participatory Research: Ameliorating Conflict When Community and Research Practices Meet.基于社区的参与性研究:当社区与研究实践相遇时化解冲突
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016 Summer;10(2):259-64. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0023.
10
Community-Based Participatory Research to Adapt Health Measures for Use by People With Developmental Disabilities.基于社区的参与性研究,以调整健康措施供发育障碍患者使用。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):157-70. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0037.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France.在一项针对 2015 年 1 月在法国巴黎遭受恐怖袭击的平民的纵向研究中,存在不参与和流失现象。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00943-x.
2
Crowdsourcing in medical research: concepts and applications.医学研究中的众包:概念与应用
PeerJ. 2019 Apr 12;7:e6762. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6762. eCollection 2019.