Blackwood Ashleigh
Lit Med. 2016;34(2):278-298. doi: 10.1353/lm.2016.0014.
Today the idea of reading for health is perhaps most commonly associated with the term bibliotherapy. This seemingly new practice might be considered a significant shift of public and professional medical attitudes when compared with historical interpretations of the impact of reading on individuals' health. Much historiography concerning the reception of popular literature in eighteenth-century print culture has focused on the belief that readers of fiction, most often women, were at risk of corrupting their own minds and bodies through their reading choices. Yet, although popular, this view was not exclusively subscribed to by either medical practitioners or the wider public. This article reveals perspectives that warned against and celebrated the effects of reading on human health during the eighteenth century. Unlike what we see from much contemporary scholarship there is, in fact, a range of evidence which demonstrates that eighteenth-century medical practitioners were already engaging with the concept of reading as a therapeutic activity.
如今,为健康而阅读的理念或许最常与“阅读疗法”这个术语联系在一起。与阅读对个人健康影响的历史解读相比,这种看似新颖的做法可能被视为公众和专业医学态度的重大转变。许多关于18世纪印刷文化中通俗文学接受情况的史学研究都聚焦于这样一种观点,即小说读者(大多数是女性)往往会因阅读选择而使自己的思想和身体受到腐蚀。然而,尽管这种观点很流行,但无论是医学从业者还是更广泛的公众都并非完全认同。本文揭示了18世纪警告和赞扬阅读对人类健康影响的不同观点。事实上,与我们从许多当代学术研究中看到的不同,有一系列证据表明,18世纪的医学从业者已经在探讨阅读作为一种治疗活动的概念。