Wagner Darren N
Lit Med. 2016;34(2):320-340. doi: 10.1353/lm.2016.0016.
In eighteenth-century Britain, reading lewd books was understood to exacerbate gonorrhea. That pathology corresponded to a specific physiological model, which historians describe as the leaky male body. This article demonstrates how the connection between reading and gonorrhea correlated to three phenomena: 1) the neuro-sexual economy of bodily fluids; 2) the effects of reading on the sensible mind and body; and 3) the crossover of erotic and medical literatures. Aware of the physiological power of imagination, authors intentionally wrote to elicit strong physiological and sexual responses in readers. Concerns about the pathological and moral consequences of reading provocative material similarly informed criticisms of both the outright pornographic and the ostensibly medical. Partly in response to such criticisms, medical authors developed a more careful, decorous, and objective tone for writing about sexual topics. Ultimately, the culture of sensibility receded, as did anxieties about involuntary leaks of bodily fluids caused by reading.
在18世纪的英国,人们认为阅读淫秽书籍会加重淋病。这种病理学与一种特定的生理模型相对应,历史学家将其描述为男性身体的渗漏。本文展示了阅读与淋病之间的联系如何与三种现象相关联:1)体液的神经-性经济;2)阅读对感性心灵和身体的影响;3)色情文学与医学文献的交叉。由于意识到想象力的生理力量,作者们有意写作以引发读者强烈的生理和性反应。对阅读刺激性材料的病理和道德后果的担忧同样影响了对完全色情作品和表面上医学作品的批评。部分是为了回应此类批评,医学作者在撰写性话题时采用了更谨慎、得体和客观的语气。最终,感性文化消退了,对因阅读导致体液不自觉渗漏的焦虑也随之消失。