Feuillebois Victoire
Lit Med. 2016;34(2):370-388. doi: 10.1353/lm.2016.0018.
"Of unknown cause"- in the conclusion of the eponymous tale written by Théophile Gautier in 1833, it is not clear what exactly the protagonist Onuphrius dies of after his infatuation with E. T. A. Hoffmann drove him mad. Thus, the reference to the possibility of "Hoffmania" is both highly medicalized, as Hoffmann appears as a case study of the sick author, while all its causes and mechanisms are left unexplored. With this suppression of the etiology of pathological reading, Gautier separates himself from both the tradition of literary discourses on pathological reading and from the new etiology of mental disorders. This allows him to expound the premises of his theory of "art for art's sake," as it echoes the paradox this theory is based upon, which contends that art is free and independent, yet its effects are deeply felt on the subject's body, in a way that must remain unclear.
“病因不明”——在泰奥菲勒·戈蒂埃于1833年创作的同名故事结尾,主人公奥努弗里乌斯因痴迷于E. T. A. 霍夫曼而发疯后究竟死于何种病因并不明确。因此,对“霍夫曼癖”可能性的提及极具医学化色彩,因为霍夫曼作为患病作家的案例被研究,但其所有病因和机制却未得到探究。随着对病理性阅读病因的这种压制,戈蒂埃既脱离了关于病理性阅读的文学话语传统,也脱离了精神障碍的新病因学。这使他能够阐述其“为艺术而艺术”理论的前提,因为这与该理论所基于的悖论相呼应,该悖论认为艺术是自由且独立的,但其影响却在主体身体上有深刻体现,而这种方式必定仍不明晰。