Kennaway James
Lit Med. 2016;34(2):252-277. doi: 10.1353/lm.2016.0013.
This article will analyze the complex relationship between two separate traditions of anxiety about the medical impact of reading. On the one hand there was the older concept of the diseases of the learned (Gelehrtenkrankheiten), associated with crabbed, often impecunious academics. This is a tradition that went back centuries and drew on the six non-naturals of Galenic medicine. On the other hand there was fear that the sentimental novel-reading habits of the leisured elite were overstimulating their nerves, a model that was based primarily on the newer medicine of stimulation associated with physicians such as Cullen, Whytt, Tissot, and Brown. This article will examine how these two models of pathological reading came together during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, and what they show about the role of the imagination, luxury, gender, and sexuality.
本文将分析关于阅读对医学影响的两种不同焦虑传统之间的复杂关系。一方面是由来已久的学者病(Gelehrtenkrankheiten)概念,与乖戾、常常穷困潦倒的学者相关联。这是一个可以追溯到几个世纪以前的传统,它借鉴了盖伦医学的六种非自然因素。另一方面,有人担心有闲精英阶层阅读感伤小说的习惯过度刺激了他们的神经,这种模式主要基于与卡伦、怀特、蒂索和布朗等医生相关的新的刺激医学。本文将探讨这两种病理性阅读模式在18世纪末和19世纪初是如何结合在一起的,以及它们揭示了想象力、奢华、性别和性取向的哪些作用。