Suppr超能文献

健康素养:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会在线患者教育资料的可读性

Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.

作者信息

Kapoor Karan, George Praveen, Evans Matthew C, Miller Weldon J, Liu Stanley S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Cardiology. 2017;138(1):36-40. doi: 10.1159/000475881. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the online patient education material offered by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) is written at a higher level than the 6th-7th grade level recommended by the National Institute of Health (NIH).

METHODS

Online patient education material from each website was subjected to reading grade level (RGL) analysis using the Readability Studio Professional Edition. One-sample t testing was used to compare the mean RGLs obtained from 8 formulas to the NIH-recommended 6.5 grade level and 8th grade national mean.

RESULTS

In total, 372 articles from the ACC website and 82 from the AHA were studied. Mean (±SD) RGLs for the 454 articles were 9.6 ± 2.1, 11.2 ± 2.1, 11.9 ± 1.6, 10.8 ± 1.6, 9.7 ± 2.1, 10.8 ± 0.8, 10.5 ± 2.6, and 11.7 ± 3.5 according to the Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG Index), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), Gunning-Fog Index (GFI), New Dale-Chall reading level formula (NDC), FORCAST, Raygor Readability Estimate (RRE), and Fry Graph (Fry), respectively. All analyzed articles had significantly higher RGLs than both the NIH-recommended grade level of 6.5 and the national mean grade level of 8 (p < 0.00625).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient education material provided on the ACC and AHA websites is written above the NIH-recommended 6.5 grade level and 8th grade national mean reading level. Additional studies are required to demonstrate whether lowering the RGL of this material improves outcomes among patients with cardiovascular disease.

摘要

目的

确定美国心脏病学会(ACC)和美国心脏协会(AHA)提供的在线患者教育材料的编写水平是否高于美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)推荐的6至7年级水平。

方法

使用Readability Studio专业版对每个网站的在线患者教育材料进行阅读年级水平(RGL)分析。采用单样本t检验,将从8种公式得出的平均RGL与NIH推荐的6.5年级水平和8年级全国平均水平进行比较。

结果

总共研究了ACC网站的372篇文章和AHA网站的82篇文章。根据弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)、难词简易衡量法(SMOG指数)、科尔曼-廖指数(CLI)、冈宁-福格指数(GFI)、新戴尔-查尔阅读水平公式(NDC)、FORCAST、雷戈尔可读性估计(RRE)和弗莱图表(Fry),这454篇文章的平均(±标准差)RGL分别为9.6±2.1、11.2±2.1、11.9±1.6、10.8±1.6、9.7±2.1、10.8±0.8、10.5±2.6和11.7±3.5。所有分析的文章的RGL均显著高于NIH推荐的6.5年级水平和8年级全国平均水平(p<0.00625)。

结论

ACC和AHA网站提供的患者教育材料的编写水平高于NIH推荐的6.5年级水平和8年级全国平均阅读水平。需要进一步研究以证明降低该材料的RGL是否能改善心血管疾病患者的治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验