• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国心脏协会(AHA)和美国心脏病学会(ACC)的CardioSmart在线平台上基于网络的患者教育材料的可读性和理解度:这些网站对患者理解有多大帮助?

Assessing readability and comprehension of web-based patient education materials by American Heart Association (AHA) and CardioSmart online platform by American College of Cardiology (ACC): How useful are these websites for patient understanding?

作者信息

Wasir Amanpreet Singh, Volgman Annabelle Santos, Jolly Meenakshi

机构信息

Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Jul 12;32:100308. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100308. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100308
PMID:38510202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10946022/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are a leading cause of morbidity & mortality worldwide. Patient education materials help patients understand the disease and its management. Health literacy is an important challenge that may contribute to health inequities and disparities. The National Institute of Health and American Medical Association recommend patient education materials to be ≤6th-grade reading level.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate readability and comprehension of patient education materials related to CVD, available at the American Heart Association (AHA) & CardioSmart web platform by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) websites.

METHOD

We examined the readability and comprehension of 63 patient education materials (accessed June 2022) using: (a) Flesch Kincaid Readability Ease (FKRE): measures readability (0-100, goal > 70), (b) Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) (goal = grade 7). We compared the AHA and ACC scores using descriptive and -tests. -value ≤ 0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

Sixty-three web pages of patient education materials (AHA 24, ACC 39) were reviewed in June 2022. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) FKRE was 54.9 ± 6.8 for all the web pages. FKRE 50-60 equates to "fairly difficult to read." Mean ± SD FKGL was 10.0 ± 1.3. AHA patient education materials content was significantly more difficult to read and comprehend, were longer, and had more complex words than ACC patient education materials.

CONCLUSIONS

CVD-related patient education materials available online through leading national organizations are not congruent with the recommendations from national healthcare organizations. They are not as user-friendly as they can be. Urgent recognition of the gaps and unmet needs are indicated to optimize patient health literacy.

摘要

未标注

心血管疾病(CVD)是全球发病和死亡的主要原因。患者教育材料有助于患者了解疾病及其管理。健康素养是一个重要挑战,可能导致健康不平等和差异。美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会建议患者教育材料的阅读水平应≤六年级。

目的

评估美国心脏协会(AHA)和美国心脏病学会(ACC)网站上提供的与心血管疾病相关的患者教育材料的可读性和理解性。

方法

我们使用以下方法检查了63份患者教育材料(于2022年6月获取)的可读性和理解性:(a)弗莱什-金凯德易读性指数(FKRE):衡量可读性(0-100,目标>70),(b)弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)(目标=7年级)。我们使用描述性统计和检验比较了AHA和ACC的得分。P值≤0.05具有显著性。

结果

2022年6月审查了63个患者教育材料网页(AHA 24个,ACC 39个)。所有网页的平均±标准差(SD)FKRE为54.9±6.8。FKRE为50-60相当于“阅读难度较大”。平均±标准差FKGL为10.0±1.3。AHA患者教育材料的内容比ACC患者教育材料更难阅读和理解,篇幅更长,词汇更复杂。

结论

通过主要国家组织在线提供的与心血管疾病相关的患者教育材料与国家医疗保健组织的建议不一致。它们没有达到应有的用户友好程度。需要迫切认识到这些差距和未满足的需求,以优化患者的健康素养。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5053/10946022/ae3e80ba4e02/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5053/10946022/ae3e80ba4e02/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5053/10946022/ae3e80ba4e02/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing readability and comprehension of web-based patient education materials by American Heart Association (AHA) and CardioSmart online platform by American College of Cardiology (ACC): How useful are these websites for patient understanding?评估美国心脏协会(AHA)和美国心脏病学会(ACC)的CardioSmart在线平台上基于网络的患者教育材料的可读性和理解度:这些网站对患者理解有多大帮助?
Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Jul 12;32:100308. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100308. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.健康素养:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会在线患者教育资料的可读性
Cardiology. 2017;138(1):36-40. doi: 10.1159/000475881. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
3
Assessing and Improving the Effectiveness of Online Patient Education Materials on Essential Vocal Tremor: A Comprehensive Evaluation.评估并提高在线患者教育材料对原发性声音震颤的有效性:一项综合评估。
J Voice. 2024 Mar 15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.02.021.
4
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
5
Evaluation of Generative Language Models in Personalizing Medical Information: Instrument Validation Study.生成式语言模型在个性化医疗信息方面的评估:工具验证研究
JMIR AI. 2024 Aug 13;3:e54371. doi: 10.2196/54371.
6
Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.物理医学与康复(PM&R)患者教育材料的可读性:一项比较性横断面研究。
PM R. 2020 Apr;12(4):368-373. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12230. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
7
Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Surgical Treatments of the Spine.在线最常访问的与脊柱手术治疗相关的患者教育材料的易读性。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e583-e588. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
8
Web-Based Patient Educational Material on Osteosarcoma: Quantitative Assessment of Readability and Understandability.基于网络的骨肉瘤患者教育材料:可读性与可理解性的定量评估
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Mar 24;8(1):e25005. doi: 10.2196/25005.
9
Readability of Online Spine Patient Education Resources.在线脊柱患者教育资源的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;162:e640-e644. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.091. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
10
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating AI-Generated Patient Education Guides: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Deepseek.评估人工智能生成的患者教育指南:ChatGPT与豆包的比较研究。 需注意,原文中是ChatGPT和Deepseek,你提供的原文有误,我按照正确的Deepseek进行了翻译,若实际需求是其他,请告知。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 3;17(6):e85277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85277. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Enhancing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Using Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study.使用大语言模型提高在线患者教育材料的可读性:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 4;27:e69955. doi: 10.2196/69955.
3
Readability of Orthopaedic Patient Educational Material: An artificial intelligence application.

本文引用的文献

1
Income and outcomes of patients with incident atrial fibrillation.新发房颤患者的收入与预后
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Jun 15;76(8):736-42. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219190.
2
Association of Race and Ethnicity on the Management of Acute Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.种族和民族与急性非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死管理的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 21;11(12):e025758. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025758. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
3
The Impact of Health Literacy-Sensitive Design and Heart Age in a Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Decision Aid: Randomized Controlled Trial and End-User Testing.
骨科患者教育材料的可读性:一项人工智能应用。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 12;64:102971. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102971. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Changes in Health Education Literacy After Structured Web-Based Education Versus Self-Directed Online Information Seeking in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: Nonrandomized, Controlled Study.接受腕管松解手术患者中,基于网络的结构化教育与自主在线信息搜索后健康教育素养的变化:非随机对照研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 25;9:e65114. doi: 10.2196/65114.
5
Enhancing Stroke Awareness and Activation Among High-Risk Populations: A Randomized Direct Mail Intervention in Diverse Healthcare Settings.提高高危人群的中风意识与行动力:在不同医疗环境中的随机直邮干预措施
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 May;18(5):e011425. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011425. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
6
De novo generation of colorectal patient educational materials using large language models: Prompt engineering key to improved readability.使用大语言模型从头生成结直肠癌患者教育材料:提示工程是提高可读性的关键。
Surgery. 2025 Apr;180:109024. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.109024. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
健康素养敏感设计与心脏年龄在心血管疾病预防决策辅助工具中的影响:随机对照试验与终端用户测试
JMIR Cardio. 2022 Apr 15;6(1):e34142. doi: 10.2196/34142.
4
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2022 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
5
Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials for Coronary Artery Calcium Scans and Implications for Health Disparities.在线冠状动脉钙扫描患者教育材料的易读性及其对健康差异的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e017372. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017372. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
6
A Readability Analysis of Online Cardiovascular Disease-Related Health Education Materials.在线心血管疾病相关健康教育材料的可读性分析
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Apr;3(2):e74-e80. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190306-03. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
7
Quantitative analysis of the level of readability of online emergency radiology-based patient education resources.基于在线急诊放射学的患者教育资源可读性水平的定量分析。
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Apr;25(2):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1566-7. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
8
Readability of online allergy and immunology educational resources for patients: Implications for physicians.面向患者的在线过敏与免疫学教育资源的可读性:对医生的启示
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;6(1):286-288.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
9
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure.充血性心力衰竭在线患者教育材料的可读性评估
Adv Prev Med. 2017;2017:9780317. doi: 10.1155/2017/9780317. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.健康素养:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会在线患者教育资料的可读性
Cardiology. 2017;138(1):36-40. doi: 10.1159/000475881. Epub 2017 Jun 2.