Wasir Amanpreet Singh, Volgman Annabelle Santos, Jolly Meenakshi
Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Jul 12;32:100308. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100308. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are a leading cause of morbidity & mortality worldwide. Patient education materials help patients understand the disease and its management. Health literacy is an important challenge that may contribute to health inequities and disparities. The National Institute of Health and American Medical Association recommend patient education materials to be ≤6th-grade reading level.
To evaluate readability and comprehension of patient education materials related to CVD, available at the American Heart Association (AHA) & CardioSmart web platform by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) websites.
We examined the readability and comprehension of 63 patient education materials (accessed June 2022) using: (a) Flesch Kincaid Readability Ease (FKRE): measures readability (0-100, goal > 70), (b) Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) (goal = grade 7). We compared the AHA and ACC scores using descriptive and -tests. -value ≤ 0.05 was significant.
Sixty-three web pages of patient education materials (AHA 24, ACC 39) were reviewed in June 2022. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) FKRE was 54.9 ± 6.8 for all the web pages. FKRE 50-60 equates to "fairly difficult to read." Mean ± SD FKGL was 10.0 ± 1.3. AHA patient education materials content was significantly more difficult to read and comprehend, were longer, and had more complex words than ACC patient education materials.
CVD-related patient education materials available online through leading national organizations are not congruent with the recommendations from national healthcare organizations. They are not as user-friendly as they can be. Urgent recognition of the gaps and unmet needs are indicated to optimize patient health literacy.
心血管疾病(CVD)是全球发病和死亡的主要原因。患者教育材料有助于患者了解疾病及其管理。健康素养是一个重要挑战,可能导致健康不平等和差异。美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会建议患者教育材料的阅读水平应≤六年级。
评估美国心脏协会(AHA)和美国心脏病学会(ACC)网站上提供的与心血管疾病相关的患者教育材料的可读性和理解性。
我们使用以下方法检查了63份患者教育材料(于2022年6月获取)的可读性和理解性:(a)弗莱什-金凯德易读性指数(FKRE):衡量可读性(0-100,目标>70),(b)弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)(目标=7年级)。我们使用描述性统计和检验比较了AHA和ACC的得分。P值≤0.05具有显著性。
2022年6月审查了63个患者教育材料网页(AHA 24个,ACC 39个)。所有网页的平均±标准差(SD)FKRE为54.9±6.8。FKRE为50-60相当于“阅读难度较大”。平均±标准差FKGL为10.0±1.3。AHA患者教育材料的内容比ACC患者教育材料更难阅读和理解,篇幅更长,词汇更复杂。
通过主要国家组织在线提供的与心血管疾病相关的患者教育材料与国家医疗保健组织的建议不一致。它们没有达到应有的用户友好程度。需要迫切认识到这些差距和未满足的需求,以优化患者的健康素养。