• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肱骨假肢界面承窝压力的特征分析:病例系列研究

Characterization of interfacial socket pressure in transhumeral prostheses: A case series.

作者信息

Schofield Jonathon S, Schoepp Katherine R, Williams Heather E, Carey Jason P, Marasco Paul D, Hebert Jacqueline S

机构信息

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178517. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0178517
PMID:28575012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5456071/
Abstract

One of the most important factors in successful upper limb prostheses is the socket design. Sockets must be individually fabricated to arrive at a geometry that suits the user's morphology and appropriately distributes the pressures associated with prosthetic use across the residual limb. In higher levels of amputation, such as transhumeral, this challenge is amplified as prosthetic weight and the physical demands placed on the residual limb are heightened. Yet, in the upper limb, socket fabrication is largely driven by heuristic practices. An analytical understanding of the interactions between the socket and residual limb is absent in literature. This work describes techniques, adapted from lower limb prosthetic research, to empirically characterize the pressure distribution occurring between the residual limb and well-fit transhumeral prosthetic sockets. A case series analyzing the result of four participants with transhumeral amputation is presented. A Tekscan VersaTek pressure measurement system and FaroArm Edge coordinate measurement machine were employed to capture socket-residual limb interface pressures and geometrically register these values to the anatomy of participants. Participants performed two static poses with their prosthesis under two separate loading conditions. Surface pressure maps were constructed from the data, highlighting pressure distribution patterns, anatomical locations bearing maximum pressure, and the relative pressure magnitudes. Pressure distribution patterns demonstrated unique characteristics across the four participants that could be traced to individual socket design considerations. This work presents a technique that implements commercially available tools to quantitatively characterize upper limb socket-residual limb interactions. This is a fundamental first step toward improved socket designs developed through informed, analytically-based design tools.

摘要

成功的上肢假肢最重要的因素之一是接受腔设计。接受腔必须进行个性化制作,以获得适合用户形态的几何形状,并在残肢上适当分布与假肢使用相关的压力。在较高水平的截肢中,如经肱骨截肢,由于假肢重量增加以及对残肢的身体需求提高,这一挑战被放大。然而,在上肢假肢领域,接受腔制作在很大程度上仍由经验做法主导。文献中缺乏对接受腔与残肢之间相互作用的分析理解。这项工作描述了从下肢假肢研究中借鉴的技术,以实证方式表征残肢与适配良好的经肱骨假肢接受腔之间的压力分布。本文展示了一个分析四名经肱骨截肢参与者结果的病例系列。使用Tekscan VersaTek压力测量系统和FaroArm Edge坐标测量机来获取接受腔 - 残肢界面压力,并将这些值在几何上与参与者的解剖结构进行配准。参与者在两种不同的加载条件下,用他们的假肢摆出两个静态姿势。根据数据构建表面压力图,突出显示压力分布模式、承受最大压力的解剖位置以及相对压力大小。四名参与者的压力分布模式呈现出独特的特征,这些特征可以追溯到个体接受腔设计的考虑因素。这项工作提出了一种技术,该技术利用商用工具定量表征上肢接受腔 - 残肢的相互作用。这是朝着通过基于分析的明智设计工具开发改进接受腔设计迈出的重要第一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/83bc81fbb362/pone.0178517.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/693c1212e3c9/pone.0178517.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/6fc5ad53e60c/pone.0178517.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/4bd59e977bc6/pone.0178517.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/904367691e5b/pone.0178517.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/212fc3d19cc3/pone.0178517.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/83bc81fbb362/pone.0178517.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/693c1212e3c9/pone.0178517.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/6fc5ad53e60c/pone.0178517.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/4bd59e977bc6/pone.0178517.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/904367691e5b/pone.0178517.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/212fc3d19cc3/pone.0178517.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d16/5456071/83bc81fbb362/pone.0178517.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterization of interfacial socket pressure in transhumeral prostheses: A case series.经肱骨假肢界面承窝压力的特征分析:病例系列研究
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178517. eCollection 2017.
2
An adaptive socket with auto-adjusting air bladders for interfacing transhumeral prosthesis: A pilot study.一种用于连接经肱骨假肢的带自动调节气囊的自适应接受腔:一项初步研究。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2019 Aug;233(8):812-822. doi: 10.1177/0954411919853960. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
3
Comparison of transhumeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study.利用患者评估以及体内骨骼和接受腔运动跟踪对经肱骨接受腔设计进行比较:一项案例研究
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):423-32. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.981876. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
4
Clinical utility of pressure feedback to socket design and fabrication.压力反馈对接受腔设计与制造的临床应用价值。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020 Feb;44(1):18-26. doi: 10.1177/0309364619868364. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
5
Fabrication and application of an adjustable myoelectric transhumeral prosthetic socket.一种可调节肌电经肱骨假肢接受腔的制造与应用
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Oct;43(5):564-567. doi: 10.1177/0309364619836353. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
6
Static and dynamic pressure prediction for prosthetic socket fitting assessment utilising an inverse problem approach.利用反问题方法对假肢接受腔适配进行静态和动态压力预测。
Artif Intell Med. 2012 Jan;54(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
7
State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review.下肢假肢生物力学-接受腔界面的前沿研究综述
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001 Mar-Apr;38(2):161-74.
8
Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.两种经胫骨假肢接受腔概念的动态界面压力分布
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(3):405-15.
9
Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.经胫骨截肢者假肢接受腔内界面应力测量技术:过去50年研究综述
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Jul 20;16(7):1119. doi: 10.3390/s16071119.
10
Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications.可调节义肢接受腔:工业和研究设计特点及其合理性的系统评价。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Nov 6;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01270-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing 3D printable density-graded lattice structures to minimize risk of tissue damage from compression-release stabilized sockets.评估3D可打印密度渐变晶格结构,以将压缩释放稳定型承窝造成组织损伤的风险降至最低。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2025 Feb 1;49(1):76-82. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000406. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
Advances in the measurement of prosthetic socket interface mechanics: a review of technology, techniques, and a 20-year update.假肢接受腔接口力学测量技术的进展:技术、技术方法综述及 20 年的更新。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Jul-Dec;20(9):729-739. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2244418. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of biomechanical variables on force sensitive resistor error: Implications for calibration and improved accuracy.生物力学变量对力敏电阻误差的影响:对校准和提高准确性的启示。
J Biomech. 2016 Mar 21;49(5):786-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
2
Comparison of transhumeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study.利用患者评估以及体内骨骼和接受腔运动跟踪对经肱骨接受腔设计进行比较:一项案例研究
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):423-32. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.981876. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
3
Review of the socket design and interface pressure measurement for transtibial prosthesis.
The Impact of Limited Prosthetic Socket Documentation: A Researcher Perspective.
有限的假肢接受腔文档记录的影响:研究者视角
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Mar 7;3:853414. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.853414. eCollection 2022.
4
A Scoping Review of Pressure Measurements in Prosthetic Sockets of Transfemoral Amputees during Ambulation: Key Considerations for Sensor Design.一种用于评估穿戴假肢者在行走过程中接受腔压力的范围:对传感器设计的关键考虑因素。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 23;21(15):5016. doi: 10.3390/s21155016.
5
A Modular Adjustable Transhumeral Prosthetic Socket for Evaluating Myoelectric Control.一种用于评估肌电控制的模块化可调节经肱骨假肢接受腔
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2020 Jul 1;8:0700210. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2020.3006416. eCollection 2020.
经胫骨假体的承窝设计与界面压力测量综述。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:849073. doi: 10.1155/2014/849073. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
4
Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.具有真空辅助悬吊功能的经股式接受腔:髋部运动学、接受腔位置、接触压力及偏好的比较:坐骨包容型与无边缘型
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(9):1241-52. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.01.0003.
5
Prosthetic sockets stabilized by alternating areas of tissue compression and release.通过组织压缩和释放交替区域实现稳定的假肢接受腔。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):679-96. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.12.0197.
6
Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts.单侧上肢缺失:越南战争以及伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动冲突中的退伍军人和现役军人的满意度及假肢使用情况
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):299-316. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0027.
7
Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.两种经胫骨假肢接受腔概念的动态界面压力分布
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(3):405-15.
8
Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics.上肢假肢的消费者设计优先事项。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Nov;2(6):346-57. doi: 10.1080/17483100701714733.
9
Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050.估算2005年至2050年美国肢体缺失的患病率。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):422-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.
10
Expert opinions on success factors for upper-limb prostheses.上肢假肢成功因素的专家意见。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(4):483-9. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.08.0087.